Comment Re: "...a few seconds to pay in Bitcoin" (Score 1) 124
Hahahahaha.
Hahahahaha.
Wasn't there an 80186? That literally nobody built anything with? Like, it was almost a proof of concept?
Just today I noted that GIMP 3.2.2 (an application, not an OS) has dropped support for 32-bit x86.
What's more, you really have to know what you're doing to coax it into re-using code, rather than rewriting the same functionality with each prompt.
Ignorance is a state of bliss for you.
AI readily generates code that exceeds Jr level programmer code by a wide margin.
It can also produce utter garbage.
But it is in no way equivalent to monkeys on a keyboard. Its success rate is significantly higher than that.
Clean room design is a legal strategy, but it is not a legal requirement. There are other methods that can be used for creating works not considered to being a derivative work.
Also a reminder, words used in law don't have the same meaning in language. The law usually narrows the meaning explicitly, or implicitly via case law.
GNU has used this to their advantage to clone most of the shell runtime utilities, so why shouldn't the same be used to replace GNU licensed code?
JavaScript is actually a pretty interesting, powerful language, but one with quite a few problems. (I recommend the book JavaScript: The Good Parts by Douglas Crockford if you want to learn more about that.) TypeScript solves some, but by no means all, of those problems. From what I've heard, it's increasingly popular.
Open claw can use local LLM, but typical configuration is remove LLM api calls. It's not running everything in the device.
It's not friendly, but then, I didn't ask for it to be.
quite seriously, it's rather functional for a vibe coded / accidental development.
https://mdtopham.github.io/Vibecoded/asteroids.html
do what you want with it.
Chinese vehicles, both EV and ICE, are selling like crazy in every market where they can legally be sold. I've spent some time in Latin America recently and have ridden in several of the various models, and the reality is that they are all quite nice. The Uber drivers driving them invariably think that they got excellent value for their money.
In the United States we don't have access to these inexpensive brands. We can either buy expensive ICE vehicles, or even more expensive EVs where you pay a premium to not burn fossil fuels. In that situation it makes sense to want a vehicle that competes favorably with an ICE vehicle. After all, you can get a perfectly good ICE or hybrid vehicle for less than it would cost to buy a less capable EV.
The equation shifts dramatically when the Chinese vehicle you are looking at (whether it is ICE or EV) is 1/3 to 1/2 the price of a comparable vehicle. If I could get a Chinese EV for $13K I, personally, would be willing to put up with some of its shortcomings. As an example, I like the idea of the American made and designed Slate truck. However, it isn't available until next year at the earliest, and it is likely to cost $30K, very close to what a base model Ford Maverik, Nissan Frontera, or even a Toyota Tacoma currently cost. At that price it doesn't really make sense to purchase the far less capable electric vehicle.
However, if the Slate only cost $15K then it becomes far more interesting. That's the sort of price difference that Chinese brands are currently offering. I could learn to live with a range of 150 miles (that's supposedly the Slate's range, Chinese vehicles typically offer more than that), if it costs half as much as the competition. China is making vehicles that are more than competitive with what we currently have access to in the United States, and the prices are very low. The only thing keeping China from making huge inroads in the U.S. auto market is politics.
Sure there are some people that will never buy a Chinese vehicle, and there are other people that will never buy an EV. That's fine. I remember when the same arguments were made against Japanese (and later Korean) vehicles. If the politicians really thought that no one would be interested in these cars then they wouldn't need to protect us from them with tariffs.
Nothing will ever be attempted if all possible objections must be first overcome. -- Dr. Johnson