If you did this in Canada, whatever you create is more or less completely and instantly public domain. You could fight over details in court, but to win you'd need to have done most of what you're using the AI to avoid doing.

This is the first I'm hearing that photons created with technology are functionally different from naturally produced photons.

Kids still end up in the dark when the days get short.

My solution is not the same. You seem to have missed the 'fixed' concept. As in 'no Daylight Saving adjustments'.

Outside workers will benefit more from dropping the adjustment ' they'd keep daylight in the middle of their work day instead of having it shifted towards evening.

The time change induces stress and literally kills people. Not changing time might make northerners depressed from lack of morning light...

You know what? We have artificial lighting and spend most of our time indoors anyway. Encourage broad spectrum home and office lighting and use UTC with a fixed local longitudinal adjustment.

Not surprising to find someone 'brave' enough to downvote that. What a hero for the white power cause!

Are you kidding? There's nobody he cares about.

And what a horrible piece of Lost Cause propaganda that movie is. It doesn't say much that's good about the people who made it, who bought tickets, or who continue to hold it up as an example of a 'great classic' even today.

I was not disappointed, but neither was I impressed.

They did a competent job of trotting out the nostalgia bits. I would even go so far as to say they did a better job of mixing cartoon physics with the real world than Who Framed Roger Rabbit or Space Jam. It felt like a real world movie with toons in it rather than a cartoon with real people in it.

Having said that, I had nobody to root for so it didn't engage me. The story did a poor job of making me care.

It happened when you got old and apparently didn't notice.

BTDT.

I guess it's time to RTFA, because I have only the vaguest notion of how you might do that, and zero idea how you could get anything like a tolerable framerate.

Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't believe SQL includes client data rendering. At least not any SQL implementation I've ever worked with. There's always a client that has to interpret SQL data and convert it into a rendered frame as well as send user input back to SQL as a query.

That would seem to be enough of a limitation to 'Doom on SQL' to make the total project... doomed from the start. It remains an interesting exercise in getting SQL to do the rest of it. As long as the code to do so is elegant, it doesn't really matter how Rube Goldberg it gets.

In fact, I might even be more impressed as the SQL gets more convoluted.

They really messed up the results by not labeling everything owned by Murdoch as pink slime

Posting anonymously now just to get the last word in? Nice try but I see right through that as well as your sneaky attempt to put words in my mouth in order to make your fictional version of my argument either to discount.

A legacy of poor enforcement isn't the same thing as it being legal.

Or blatant lying in advertisements, for that matter. Or shouting "fire" in a crowded theater. And yes, as you say, there's plenty of precedent on restricting politicians and various government officials from unduly enriching themselves using the power and/or influence of their position. There's in fact tons of well-established legal precedents where public well-being preempts free speech rights. Anyone making this argument in this fashion isn't doing it in good faith.

Bullshit. You can't just characterize any business plan as a first amendment right. The first amendment doesn't protect pyramid schemes, or robbing liquor stores. Even just trying to make this argument makes you a bad person.