And say that if you've had a bug in your code for 8 years and the code is actually in production and being used then the bug wasn't all that important.
I'd have to say that's pretty much proof that you're a retard. Every bug is a potential entry point for malware or bad-actors, shit-for-brains.
It has low levels of cannabinoids, so you would have to smoke a bushel to get high. It grows quickly anywhere, hence its nickname "weed." The only faster-growing plant is Kudzu, if memory serves. But it is politically untouchable. Then again, democracies only last 250 years, so maybe we will get relief soon.
That was my first (and second) thought as well: Grow bamboo (but maybe not in the Arizona desert).
And yes, you MUST obey commands from the police. PERIOD. Even if they are wrong. Even if they are illegal. Your venue for fighting wrong is in the courts, not in the streets.
This is false... but good advice.
You are required by law to comply with all LEGAL ORDERS issued by a police officer. You are not required to comply with illegal orders, or to agree to requests. Only LEGAL ORDERS are required to be followed.
But... refusing an armed and armored assailant with a badge is likely to get you hurt or killed.
The smart thing to do is to comply. It is not worth risking your life and safety. Leave the arguments for your lawyer to make in court.
It's not the size of the model, but what you do with it. or so I am told...
Canceling a contract is not the same as passing an ordinance against something.
Moreover, if you look at the wording when the do actually pass an ordinance, most of the time they only ban the installation on city owned property. They do not address the placement of flock cameras on Federal, State, County, or Private property.
The Supreme Court said that cellular telephone location data is covered by the 4th amendment right to privacy -they did not say anything about vehicle license plates in this particular case, so the rest is just speculation.
In my area we got rid of them by putting political pressure on the City Council to cancel the contract.
I have seen them simply put the cameras on non-city owned property to get around having the city council vote them down. They put them on Federal, State, County, and even privately owned property.
No, unfortunately not.
In the Supreme Court ruling, the Court specifically addressed the issue that the purpose for which the information was shared was relevant to the establishment of a privacy interest.
Cell phone information is shared with the cell tower operators as a necessary function of the cellular system: your phone wont work if the towers do not know how to route the data to you. You maintain a 4th amendment privacy interest in the information, even though it is shared with third parties.
Your license plate number is shared for the purpose of identifying your vehicle to police/government authorities. You do not have a 4th amendment privacy interest in keeping it from the police/government authorities.
We will have to find other ways of getting Flock out of our lives. It will probably take passing new laws to do it.
They want government regulation and licensing -so that no new players can compete with them.
One good reason why computers can do more work than people is that they never have to stop and answer the phone.
