No, I haven't. The code that LLMs generate is suspicious at best. But that's the thing with so-called 'vibe coding': it's something that non-programmers do. They iterate using the prompts, not by taking the code generated by the LLM and fixing it up themselves.

You keep using the word hoax but clearly have no idea what the word means.

I like everything you wrote but wish to point out that the word can suggests it might not be happening right now. These idiots are dangerous and people suffer every day because they are allowed to shoot their ignorant nonsense. It's not something that can happen, but rather something that *is happening*.

Misinformation has a definition. Hint, if someone thinks there is such a thing as alternate facts they can't tell accurate information from misinformation. Of you go now ...

If you're 'vibe coding', you're not interacting with the code anyway.

> At some point your UI has reached peak usability and the you can only go downhill.

That point happened in 2009.

Also another case of Microsoft touting a "new" feature that other OS's have had for decades.

You don't seem to know the difference between source code and assembly code. Source code has comments and variables with properly chosen names that cannot be derived from the binaries. That first statement means you don't really have any experience writing software and reverse engineering.

There's also the subject-verb disagreement bubble.

* Obvious typo is obvious

No; it is not. They are decriminalized based on qualifications. There actually is such a thing a being over-qualified. They also aren't going to hire anyone else who they know will jump ship at the first opportunity who is likely to find one.

The woosh was over your head two posts back.

Learn to read and you'll have your answer.

DVD rentals are like prostitutes. You don't pay to be able to have them. You pay for them to leave afterwards.

Paris