Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Great, they cannot even get simple things right (Score 1) 93

I have. With additional complexities, namely moving airplanes. You are clearly a clueless idiot full of yourself. Not everything that people like you find "very hard" actually is very hard. It just takes somebody with an actual clue (you do not qualify) to do it.

Comment Re:AI Tools is far more than LLMs (Score 1) 46

If you see that as a mistake, you are a moron and ignoring reality.

Reality is this: Many of the latest "LLM discovered" security bugs would have been found with entirely non-AI conventional tools. These tools were not used. And, incidentally, non-LLM "AI" does basically play no role in software security.

Comment Re:Patrick Boyle explained to this (Score 1) 52

Not to mention that cellular works because the cells are relatively small. With satellite cell service, each vehicle serves a much larger area, but the radio spectrum is the same and can only service a limited number of devices.

If an area becomes overloaded a terrestrial provider can just add more cell towers and reduce the cell size. If a large area covered by one satellite becomes overloaded, SpaceX is screwed.

Recently they have been introducing limits on their "unlimited" satellite internet product, because it is getting over-subscribed. So you are absolutely right, they have already hit their capacity limits in some areas and are trying to wring as much revenue out of them as possible by enshittifying the service now.

Comment Re: Cyberfreezers (Score 1) 91

Because it's cheaper to suffer some cyber attacks than it is to employ people to go and manually adjust the temperature. The supermarkets save a lot of money with these automatic controls, because they pay the spot price for electricity. The prices are announced 24 hours in advance, so they drop the thermostat a degree or two when electricity is cheap, and then up a degree or two when it's expensive, to keep within the legal limits.

This loss is insured and will cost them far, far less than they save.

Comment Re:The China Strategy (Score -1, Flamebait) 134

The Chinese are winning at manufacturing because they just do it better. Their supply chains are unrivalled, and that makes them extremely agile.

We can compete in Europe. Manufacturers here are now starting to offer cars that compete with Chinese models on price, which suggests that they were just ripping us off before.

I wouldn't buy a Liberty Phone because I'm European, but we do have Fairphone and I wouldn't buy one of those either because I need top tier cameras. I know a couple of people who have them and they are pretty good, except for the cameras which are mid tier at best.

Comment Re:Surprisingly good. (Score 1) 134

The Model Y isn't a very good car anyway. No physical controls for most functions, including things like gear selection and headlights. The automatic systems don't work very well (they don't in most cars, e.g. the auto high beams tend to blind other people because they react too slowly, and Teslas are some of the worst for it). It's uncomfortable and you have to deal with frequent software updates and in-car monetization.

Comment Re:Why? (Score 2) 31

Right, we can learn about longer term habitation on other worlds in low gravity, and about collecting resources. The Moon has water and H3 and other stuff.

This time the effort of getting there will probably be more sustainable, because China is unlikely to give up even if the US somehow gets back there first, and because the whole industry is more sustainable now.

Comment Re:Unidirectional serial adapter, TX lines but no (Score 1) 91

Yes to both questions about people, but both are engineers. I do not think technical illiteracy is getting larger. It was always very large, with brief periods where more people had basic knowledge about some specific tech as the alternative was simply no or no meaningful access to that technology.

Comment Re:Unidirectional serial adapter, TX lines but no (Score 1) 91

It is bot historically and currently true that most people are incompetent and suck at risk management.

Of course that's never really been the case, but now that any bozo with $200 in their pocket can just pay an AI to find every possible security hole and report back, it's REALLY not the case.

By far not "every possible", but enough to massively increase the pool of attackers with a newly discovered vulnerability. And since most software is missing redundant security (because most software does not qualify as a product of professional engineering) this is far too easy. All engineering disciplines had to eventually accept that the thing that protects you is redundancy, because mistakes cannot be brough down enough. IT is not there at all, but it will not have a choice now.

Slashdot Top Deals

Nothing motivates a man more than to see his boss put in an honest day's work.

Working...