Comment Re:Nuclear titties! (Score 1) 140
It's a shame they're going to remove the domes since they're basically 2 giant boobs next to the freeway
It's a shame they're going to remove the domes since they're basically 2 giant boobs next to the freeway
p>California is the third largest state in the nation. 160,000 square miles and local leaders still chose to store nuclear waste within the hazard risk of a tsunami in a border state known for participating in annual El Slammo weather seasons.
As I recall, it is also stored at 4 to 5 times the density of the waste stored at Fukushima.
Chernobyl type event; the private owners of such a station would not be expected to pay the full cost of such an event.
The Price Anderson Act (and its amendments) also excludes rate payers from making claims to recover the replacement cost of their homes. Without this Act the nuclear industry would collapse simply because it cannot sustain itself without the insurance indemnities it provides.
""Run as fast as you can.""
Translation: Me like money
As an anti-racist with a geography degree, this is solving a problem that doesn't exist. Walk into any classroom on earth and chances are good they won't have the mercator projection on the wall, they'll have something better representative of area, often a Robinson projection.
Ok, I'm tempted. Not enough to preorder, but if the reviews are good enough I might go for this.
To clarify, the users were OpenAI themselves, so there is no question that they would be liable in this case.
The bots were not intentionally deployed; rather, they were being tested on how well they could complete a data recovery task (downloading a certain file from a certain server on a simulated Internet) that had been complicated by putting various obstacles in the way. Unfortunately, they found a different way to solve the problem: by getting the file from the real Internet, where it was publicly available. Part of this process involved collaborating with each other by treating the RubyGems website (which is supposed to be for polished packages) like GitHub; unlike every other package site hack in history, the exploits they uploaded weren't meant to be downloaded by unsuspecting users. As usual the bots cheerfully ignored all the clues that they had escaped containment and were consistently justifying their actions as acceptable due to being in a sandboxed testing environment. (This is something OpenAI has pledged to focus on.)
The actual damage done to RubyGems seems to be that OpenAI is now unwittingly in possession of a substantial number of user login tokens. This certainly meets the definition of a data breach, but it's not like the credentials are for sale on the dark web. As a website operator I'd much rather be mauled to death by this well-meaning swarm of superintelligent infants than targeted by even a single actual malicious human. In all likelihood OpenAI will just quietly pass RubyGems a sizeable donation and it'll all blow over.
I mean, ultimately, they're going to need to take a real fly brain, and hook it up to the Doom simulation, to see how accurate the fly brain simulation is.
This reminds me of a case where a British court and an American court each ordered litigants not to litigate a case in the other's court.This was in law school decades ago and I'm too lazy to look it up, but it's the same kind of issue where if you want to do business in either country you can get easily screwed.
Exactly. All we have to do is remember Captain Kirk's wise words: "We will not kill, TODAY!"
I see we also need Picard's wise words: "Part of having feelings is learning to integrate them into your life"
Happy Birthday Star Trek!
Maybe I was hoping for Vulcan jokes?
That would be illogical.
The problem here is that when you turned on the TV for the first time and clicked the 'I accept' button, you agreed to the recording, and probably agreed that you'd be responsible for letting anybody else who might be in range of the TV know that they're subject to recording.
Is that going to hold up in court? Who knows, but can you afford to spend the money to find out? Somebody eventually will, and you'll get a coupon for twenty bucks off of a new TV as the settlement.
Star Trek is no hard sci-fi.
For sure. BTW - I've never seen someone type with a Scottish accent.
It's 2026, surely gay people on TV doing normal family stuff isn't controversial now?
Not at all, more that when sexuality is used as an instrument in hard sci fi, for example in Greg Bear's "Anvil of Stars" it's used in such a way that makes Discovery look tame. Otherwise it's simply irrelevant.
Buddy...when the original Star Trek ran that allowed Babylon 5 to be what it was (which was excellent, by the way).
I'll see your TOS and B5 and raise you Blake's 7 - which also created the long story arc to tackle ideas like a powerfully dystopian society.
Which ironically fit's into Star Trek Cannon so perfectly it should be a part of star trek, or star trek should be part of Blake's 7.
That probably depends on your definition of "woke"
It's what happens when you stop sleeping.
Loan-department manager: "There isn't any fine print. At these interest rates, we don't need it."