Comment Re:Summary ... (Score 1) 277
But the solipsists don't care, and stupid is not fixable.
Yeah humid here like that too. Often 35C (about 95F) at midnight, those nights play havoc with people's sleep. You just can't sleep and live in AC constantly so as much dark as possible is needed to make up for that just so you can open the windows and get some fresh air at night.
With the stupidity of loosing DST the tradies would start in the morning when it is finally cool enough to get some decent sleep for a few hours. I can think of other reasons to keep DST however sleep would be the main one. With DST it's some help in getting sleep and that hour makes the difference between functional and fatigued, between getting home or having a car accident.
Unless, of course these morons are proposing to add a legally mandated afternoon siesta to their proposal.
Comment Re:Summary ... (Score 1) 277
The world seems to be moving towards trying to simplify time a bit, e.g. by discontinuing leap seconds.
Management paid little attention to dates in the 20th century does anyone seriously think they will pay attention to a leap hour as an edge case for time? I'm gonna have to get more popcorn. Obviously the issue is because software is still made as cheaply as possible and even with the subject of time right in their face they still don't code to handle it. So let's abolish accuracy and assume the earth is always the same size - slaps forehead.
Personally I'd start a project to build a booster large enough to correct the Earth's orbit of the sun to a nice round 256 days
Maybe 360 days would make it nice and round.
Comment Re:Summary ... (Score 1) 277
Here's a solution for you. Universal coordinated time. UCT is the same time around the world. You don't have to ever change what time it is.
Fuck it - let's go epoch time all around the world no more DST, no stupid 720 degree clock or timezones. While we're at it - let's get rid of days of the week, month and years as well. It's 1791452533 right now, I'll see you at 1791452533.
I'd say another drawback to getting rid DST is that any tradesman working outside would have to start banging hammers an hour earlier to miss the heat of the day waking people up whilst construction projects miss an hour per day, per person, per project because exhaustion leads to fatal work accidents.
Then there is the additional energy consumption required for lighting in the evening that would have been provided by the sun for free.
Comment Re:Summary ... (Score 1) 277
One could also just have business hours change instead of switching around the clocks. It's a bit more logical for humans to alter how they interact with time due to their needs rather than periodically switching what time represents.
Comment Re:are you serious? (Score 1) 91
Comment are you serious? (Score 1) 91
There are people still using VMWare?!?!? And their main issue is COST, rather than the fact that VMWare is like a thousand years old?
Comment Re:benefits should not be "doled out" (Score 2) 163
You don't know him and don't know he's a sociopath.
However, the people who do know him say he's a sociopath, so they probably know.
Comment Re:Crazy idea here... (Score 1) 90
If you dont want your kids going to school in the dark just change the school hours.
I'm starting to see just how complex this is all going to be and that the only thing worse than daylight savings is not having daylight savings.
Comment Re:impressive progress (Score 1) 50
I am impressed that SpaceX has made rocketry so commonplace.
As impressive as it is there is no abort capability for starship and the technology for seats that gimbal through the flip maneuver still don't exist. Falcon's retirement also retires the dragon which is the only proven functional human rated capsule in exchange for Boeing's Starliner and, well we all know just how good that is. Unless of course NASA wants to ask Russia to take American astronauts to ISS.
Then again the only realistically viable lunar lander is Alpaca which by-passes many of the issue both Blue Origin and SpaceX has with their landers. So, IMO, I think there are some compelling arguments to keeping Falcon if America wants to beat China back to the moon who, in reality, are starting to look like they will get back there first.
Of course SLS Block 1B could do the entire thing in single launch IF NASA could afford the tower upgrades.
Comment ehh (Score 1) 147
I mean the software is impressive and all, but since when is someone with a user ID in the 400,000s a long-time reader?
Comment Re: If they are thermally efficient enough (Score 1) 125
You do know that even the Kessler syndrom is something that can be fixed with progress in new materials and progress in understanding.
How does materials change orbital phenomenon?
Comment Re:If they are thermally efficient enough (Score 2) 125
solar up there can cover all the power needs 24/7, and so far Space NIMBYs have not had much effect on those mega constellations.
By far, with all these new mega constellations the biggest risk we face is from the Kessler syndrome from which there will be no way back and end any ambitions for human space exploration for thousands of years.
It would be worthwhile to have tight international regulation as it is the one interest that all countries share.
Comment Re: If they are thermally efficient enough (Score 1) 125
But they are correct - cooling in space is actually a big problem, especially for something as heat-intensive as GPUs
This will be the next frontier, the question is what happens when you keep pumping heat into them. I wonder what will it to to infrared astronomy? Also, electronics will have to stay inside the Van Alan belt, so it will be interesting how the issue of cosmic radiation flipping bits will be handled.
Comment Re:Uh HUH (Score 1) 84
"I forget what they call it"