Has nothing to do with AI.
Literally half the stories on Slashdot are currently about how people are reading AI summaries and not going further. This particular case may not be relevant to AI but my point was that AI will make it worse as more and more people are trained not to go and get authoritative answers.
Anyway, if I would be hiking, I had paper maps.
They literally had paper maps with them. They just printed them from a non-authoritative source.
"Well, the restaurant is west from the exit - that way is west ..."
That has fuck all to do with "physics" nor does it have to do with people being good or bad at navigation. People navigate in different ways. Most people navigate their entire lives without having a clue what north easy south or west means. Just because you navigate by the sun and someone else navigates via landmarks doesn't make one better or worse.
Here's an anecdote for you. I was diving last week in Lembeh. A couple asked our group how to navigate the house reef. One person answered: Head out from the reef, max depth is about 20m, then head north west, when you're at half tank come up to 10m and head south east and when you get to 50bar you should be back where you started. They stared blankly, not the least because they didn't have a compass. They weren't stupid, the instructions just didn't suit them.
Now the actual successful instructions: Head out past the semi-sunken boat. Keep going past the artificial reef, past the oil barrel, until you get to a satellite dish. Turn left. Swim maintaining your same depth until you get to half tank. Turn leftish and swim until you're at 10m then left again and maintain 10m until you reach the artificial reef again.
These instructions worked wonderfully for them, they are the kind of instructions that infuriate my wife who is more interested in knowing directions than landmarks.