Comment Re:Poe's law (Score 1) 7
No, I think you're the victim of Poe's Law, not its perpetrator.
No, I think you're the victim of Poe's Law, not its perpetrator.
If not being heartless is being a leftist, then I'm leftist. Letting children die so you can become even more filthy rich is just pure evil.
This is a drug that costs less than ten bucks to manufacture that stops children from dying a horrible death from a severe allergy. Charging six hundred bucks for it is beyond criminal and wel into Evil with a capital E. Satanically evil.
If taxes are punishment then the rich need their taxes tripled after all the unpunished evil they've done so far this century. The poor are being punished enough - by the rich. If having to pay for roads and bridges is punishment, then having to pay for food and water is, too.
As a Christian, I have no problem with taxes (Mark 12:17). Of course, if you worship mammon rather than God, taxes would indeed be punishment.
Was this their ad?
Mostly 'cause my degree costed like 5000 bucks. Our universities challenge your brain, not your wallet.
It's easy to get in, IIRC the financial investment is roughly 500 bucks a semester. Most of it is state funded. You'd assume that everyone and their dog takes that offer? You bet. So the university has zero, none, nada requirement or even interest to hold your hand and carry you through. You make it, great, if not, step aside you're holding the line up. Dropout rates are "insane" by US standards, but it has its advantages. First of all, those that do manage to get through this are good. Really, really good. And second, nobody has time for bullshit like "microaggressions" or "safe spaces".
All that is required for being an atheist is a lack of belief in a god. That doesn't keep you from believing in any other bullshit story (there's plenty of atheists that believe in aliens).
Bullshit.
Every god in the history of mankind has always supported the ideas and actions of those that invented him. Gods and their "commandments" are by definition the mirror of the morals and ideals of the societies that create them.
That is exactly the point of the whole damn subthread.
Considering the whole mess that PC game was is a half-baked, barely ported console clone, one has to wonder whether that rootkit exists in the console version as well, and whether it can be used to gain control over the system...
Why should rootkits only work against the interests of the person owning... ok, that's saying too much, "being in the possession of" is a better term
Great, so next time you buy a house I won't hear you complain about shoddy insulation, leaky windows, doors I cannot lock and moldy rooms because it has walls and a roof, so the most important things are there. But I promise to deliver the door locks and insulation within the month, promised. I'll also deliver the missing walls and shingles when we remove the mold.
Then 6 months later I come and charge you extra for all that. Without delivering it, of course.
I am sure I won't hear a single complaint from you, right?
That's one good example (a better one would actually be the Lenovo laptop blunder), another would would be the iPhone.
SFV was already a mediocre, overpriced, overhyped and unfinished piece of junk. But this really is the dingleberry on top of the shit sundae.
Sic transit gloria Capcom. They really did make some awesome games in their time, but it seems today they rely on brand name alone to pump out turd after turd.
You do understand, I hope, that anitivirus and OS can't do jack against something the user wants to install, despite any and all warnings, yes? Which is, by the way, the way it SHOULD be, because the opposite is way worse: The OS deciding what I may and what I may not install on a computer I allegedly own.
And on the seventh day, He exited from append mode.
