There's a large part of the left which is reacting to do (such as on Bluesky) by saying that this is a sign that there was a terrible media focus on Arday. But this is the wrong lesson. The fault is primarily with Cambridge and Liverpool John Moore University. Cambridge when faced with the myriad evidence of plagiarism and academic dishonesty, could have just fired him. But they didn't. And Liverpool could have said that the thesis contained plagiarism, but they tried to claim otherwise when it was pretty obvious. And the plagiarism is pretty blatant as you can see just from reading the original post by Nathan Cofnas on it.
https://substack.com/@nathancofnas/p-207415162 (Cofnas having unpleasant or reprehensible views doesn't make this analysis inaccurate.) Cofnas doesn't mention there, but it is also worth noting that when Arday plagiarized, as he did there and in other things, he routinely targeted for plagiarism works of people who were of low social status, people from developing countries and the like. This looks like targeted plagiarism, premeditated to avoid detection or response.
And that was aside from all the other things, like his bizare claims about his running record, or his claims about raising massive sums of money for charities, or how he also claimed to be non-verbal until he was 11 and illiterate until he was in his teenage years. Or how he claimed to be on a TV show which had been canceled. And he claimed to have gotten people showing up to threaten him in person at his office in Cambridge but then Cambridge was unable to find any evidence such events occurred. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jason_Arday#Allegations. Or how Arday got the police to investigate people who brought up concerns https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0rd9y99grzo.
If Cambridge had acted early on and fired him and just let him go, the attention level this got would have been far smaller. And it isn't the fault of the media here. Cambridge is one of the most prestigious universities on the planet. If Cambridge or Oxford is keeping on someone who is a fabulist who has plagiarized and lied, then it is the job of the media of the pay attention to that.
Unfortunately, the wrong lessons will likely be learned. The left will see this as primarily about racism, not noticing that while some people were motivated by racism, that Adray wouldn't have been in his position if it weren't for genuine problems with the university in accepting him to his position and then defending him when all of this started coming out. Parts of the left will likely see this as a reason to go defend the next academic accused of bad behavior purely because they are on the right. The extreme right will use this as a cudgel against "DEI" and to shmear other minority academics, the vast majority of whom are completely qualified and some of whom have overcome genuine hardship to get where they are.
I have to feel very sorry for Arday's children and spouse. They don't deserve this. And obviously, Arday bears most of the blame; at the end of the day, people are responsible for their own actions, and if he hadn't kept adding lie on top of lie, this would not have happened. But Cambridge does bear responsibility in part. I doubt that the University will spend any time engaging in the self-examination that should occur.
