Does grossed out count as entertained?

Shhhh... you are giving away the grift.

Two a*holes were planing to screw each other and take control over openAI. One got ahead while the other one was distracted. Now they sue each other over who was supposed to take it over.

There is a special place in hell specifically for people who extrapolate from limited data. People who do that from meta-data are the worst. So let's not put to much weight on projections based on effects within the error margin of a random collection of studies.

Considering that the politicians you are talking about are sponsored by the people the tax is aimed at, this proposition may kill two birds with one stone.

This is an astounding lack of grasp of how humans interact from the owner of the biggest social network. I really want to know how that can happen. Can I have his brain and dissect it?

That's a cool toy - a biological combination lock where you have to add drug in a particular sequence so that parts of DNA get arranged in the right order. It will never work to protect anything, because it assumes the attacker has not knowledge of the DNA sequence of the target and the state of its transcription. That's a bold assumption considering how cheap and fast DNA and RNA sequencing is these days. Within week at most the attacker can have full understanding of the design and state of the system. From that point on you can unlock it without guessing.

Nothing in the OP relates to whether AI has human intelligence or not. The first case is who created the artwork - a human or a machine. The court decided it was the machine, although it could be argued that the art was human creation and the AI was just a fancy brush in the hands of a skilled artist. The second case was if communications on legal mater with AI are privileged. The decision was that AI is not a lawyer (duh!) so the communications are not covered by attorney-client privilege.

There is nothing in these decisions about if AI has human intelligence. I will be shocked if a judge would rule on such matter, simpli because we have no idea what human intelligence is.

The evidence contradicts your racist hypothesis - the higher fractions of Muslims correlates with fewer closed pubs. Muslims in UK:

1. England: 3,801,186 (6.7% of the population).
2. London: Has the highest concentration, with 14.3% of Londoners identifying as Muslim.
3. North-West: 6.6% of the population.
4. Yorkshire and the Humber: 4.8% of the population.
5. West Midlands: 4.2% of the population.
6. Scotland & Wales: Both have a 2.2% Muslim population.
7. Northern Ireland: 0.6%.

Kindly go back to your echo chamber for emotional support.

Clarification: I forgot the tag. Sorry (not sorry).

Subjcet says it all.

You should rid yourself of any mRNA in your body. That would keep feeling well until you die.

It is not as simple as you try to present it. First of all he ain't driving it. He is a passenger. Second, he wasn't taking pictures of the rocket:

This is what they call "espionage". I guess what happened is something like this scene (about 2 minutes in) out of Dr. Strangelove.

FAA may have an issue with "3. Passenger Attendants". Teaching positions are also quite safe, as AI seems incapable for the time being to separate fact from fiction (to put it mildly). Jobs that carry any responsibility, i.e someone has to sign off on it, are also safe because if there is anything tech bros would never do is take responsibility for their products. BS jobs on the other hand can easily be handled by AI - political and sports commentators, salesmen, models, "analysits" of various kinds ....

I may be too old to understand all the new fancy meanings of the word "Secret". In my backwards and tired mind if something was posted on the internet it does not qualify as a secret. Being unaware of information that has been out and about for years does not mean that said information was secret. It only means that the people calling it a "secret" were ignorant.