Comment Re:Gatekeeping (Score 1) 46
If it were just about pearl-clutching standards that'd be one thing(roughly the same slop problem for both; but not easier or harder); but if you want to serve the "I did this game jam thing, pay what you want if you think it's neat" you've got a lot of your desired and legitimate activity that would be immediately destroyed if you tried to throw some sort of flat economic floor under the slop guys; and you are...not exactly...dealing in the margins on units sold that pay for tons of human mod effort.
It's not like Steam doesn't have an asset flips and shovelware section as well; but they aren't, and don't pretend to be, in the business of caring all that much about things that fall below the threshold of potential commercial relevance. They do turn a blind eye to a certain number of steam keys going to kickstarter backers; and are significantly less hardass than someone like Apple about how many 'review' copies go out, so it's not like they are actively hostile to stuff that is not yet commercially viable but is trying to get there; but they basically don't touch some of the little test pieces and rough cuts and concept demos and things that itch actively seeks to.
Comment Re:Sigh (Score -1) 92
The cops are lazy, not stupid.
Double-checking stuff is work, and there will be no repercussions for the individual cops, so why should they care?
Just call the towing company and go back to the donut shop.
Comment Re: My religion also requires I be paid for nothi (Score 1) 61
A small percentage of a few billion people is a big problem.
Yes, regardless of whether their name is Muhammed or Breivik.
Comment Re:My religion also requires I be paid for nothing (Score 2) 61
Why not here? Because for starters, humanism isn't a religion (and I say that as a humanist). It's a philosophical stance within atheism. And atheism is the absence of religion** (it's literally right there in the name), not a religion. You can't claim "religious" exemptions as an atheist. What this person actually wants is a philosophical exemption, akin to, say, a vegetarian wanting an exemption from having to cook meat at a restaurant or whatnot.
** - Well, except for those atheists who worship Athe.
Comment Re:Not exactly (Score 1) 61
Yeah, nothing insular about the Amish.
(Oh wait...)
Comment Re:There are always late adopters (Score 1) 37
because they don't think it works,
Ha ha.
or because they like coding by hand,
I wonder what their employer thinks about that.
There are event people who still write *COBOL*.
AI is very good at writing COBOL.
Comment Re:The manual? (Score 2) 37
Claude was able to hold my hand through creating different resources, and took its time explaining the concept of a "resource group" multiple times until I understood the concept.
"Watching John with the machine, it was suddenly so clear. The terminator would never stop. It would never leave him, and it would never hurt him, never shout at him, or get drunk and hit him, or say it was too busy to spend time with him. It would always be there. And it would die to protect him. Of all the would-be fathers who came and went over the years, this thing, this machine, was the only one who measured up. In an insane world, it was the sanest choice." -- Sarah Connor
Comment Just 'first shareholder'. (Score 3, Interesting) 22
Comment Re: it you steel nothing.... (Score 1) 53
Good, cause I didn't hear that.
Comment Re:Take Spain as an example. (Score 4, Interesting) 137
During the war, Franco wanted Hitler to help Spain take Gibraltar.
Actually, Hitler wanted Franco to take Gibraltar.
Franco refused because the British would retaliate by taking the Canary Islands.
Comment Re:What kind of profit do they make? (Score 2) 53
What motivation could they have for intentionally making themselves look incompetent?
Comment Re: I don't care (Score 1) 180
They've already burned millions on lost races. The silver lining to patronage politics is that everything bet on the loser is lost.
Comment "Now He's On The Hunt For More Paddys" (Score 1) 89
Headline from 1845.
Comment Re: I've said it before (Score 1) 180
When we have the money we spend it and it can do work.
Giving people money to spend is a Demand Side Stimulus .
A demand-side stimulus makes sense when:
1. Unemployment is high
2. Inflation is low
3. The trade balance is in surplus
None of these conditions are currently true.
A demand-side stimulus in today's economy would fuel inflation and would mostly be spent on imports.