Comment As the Sage of Springfield Reminds Us... (Score 1) 81
The most unprecedented exercise in investor gullibility... So far. This award could have been given out annually for a few years now. Who will be the contender next year.
The most unprecedented exercise in investor gullibility... So far. This award could have been given out annually for a few years now. Who will be the contender next year.
More disturbingly, if Elvis impersonators continue multiplying at the same rate, they will account for a third of the world population by 2019.
I do my Elvis impersonations in private, so no one will ever know.
Until the 18th Century there was no such thing as "posted prices", unless prices were set by government regulation (only certain staples, and rarely). Instead you always had to dicker with the seller to arrive at what you would pay.
In the mid 1700s Quakers in Pennsylvania decided they did not like dickering since it meant both parties were trying to deceive the other to their best advantage. It also meant bad will if person A found out he paid more than person B for the same goods. To eliminate this troubling daily moral dilemma they introduced the startling new idea of offering goods at fixed prices that were posted for all to see.
Oh, how not 21st Century can you get? The idea of prices being fair and equitable, and honestly posted for everyone! How quaint! Our corporate masters have decide that we all techno-rubes to be fleeced as efficiently as data harvesting and AI can make it!
Nadella is not showing psychosis here, but the fact that he thinks his chatbot hack of a webpage is evidence of something important show him on the road to get there.
CEOs “play with AI,” develop a prototype, or generate a contract, to use Levie’s examples, and then make the leap to believing agents can do the work.
But these top-level executives aren’t the people who have to review code, discover bugs, and identify calls to hallucinated libraries before software is deployed. They aren’t responsible for training AI models on a company’s idiosyncratic contract terms, nor do they have to spend days combing through contracts to find sneaky terms, as Levie indicates.
In other words, Levie’s theory posits, CEOs don’t really understand processes well enough to know what really can and can’t be automated. But that lack of knowledge doesn’t stop them from acting on their beliefs.
In our brave new corporate controlled world adds will be inserted everywhere (and all your data belong to them -- you are automatically opted in, and probably cannot really opt out).
Here's the thing. A paid ad clearly labeled as such is an annoyance in something you are paying for. But, do you trust any chatbot provider not to train their bots to push you to buy products they want you to buy without disclosing it? Whereas Google says their rankings aren't affected by payments (other than their promoted link) they are awash in advertising cash. Chatbot vendors, especially OpenAI, are desperate for revenue.
The Trump order applies ONLY to wind power. Oil platforms are not banned for any reason. If that seems illogical well... Trump.
Mainly, yes.
Ah, for the days before we discovered that Adams always intended for Pointy Haired Boss to be the hero of the cartoon.
If you are interested learning about actual science you can read the actual paper. It is not paywalled. Look up "speleothem isotopes" to learn about specific climatologic techniques for this study.
we still don't know why this particular civilization disappeared without a record of what happened.
We do have records. We just can't read them. The Harappan language has never been deciphered. There are about 5000 inscriptions known.
That droughts led to the end of Indus Valley Civilization has been surmised for decades, this study provided a much more detailed account of the process.
For people to settle in "untouched tracts of land" you need to have water to irrigate it. Large empty areas on Earth require water for them to be "tamed".
You could ride a long for while claiming to recognize people but have poor name recall by saying "Hey! It's you!" to everybody, but then they could slip in someone you could not have ever met.
... creating wording or joins the author never intended....
Anyone who slavishly uses the serial (aka Oxford) comma, and anyone who slavishly doesn't use it will create unintended word readings. It depends on the context of what is being said and intended.
Its not a matter of who it is "on". It is a matter of intelligent handling of the affair from a HOSPITALITY company. This was an opportunity to build a good-will relationship with people staying at Marriot, which could be easily spun into a positive press event for the company.
But "enlightened capitalism" is a fiction it seems.
It is not the case that this involves a "Search For Antimatter" but rather for the fundamental explanation of why there isn't any loose in the Universe. We can make it, but only by creating an equal amount of normal matter so that they cancel out.
The person who can smile when something goes wrong has thought of someone to blame it on.