Comment Re:Social engineering redux (Score 1) 19
You know one of the pitches for these things is "They're immune to social engineering..."
Really? I've never, ever heard that pitch for AI.
You know one of the pitches for these things is "They're immune to social engineering..."
Really? I've never, ever heard that pitch for AI.
Even tobacco has fringe benefits.
Q: Do you smoke after sex?
A: I don't know. I've never checked.
Thanks for this, I, in proud slashdot tradition, did not read the article, but it was my layperson's understanding that it'd have been a bit more dramatic if it had reversed... like a pole flip or something.
Also, the amount of energy required to reverse it... it's hard to see where that could possibly have come from.
Labeling your item with a generic "BOMB" is such a rookie mistake. Always - always! - use more descriptive bluetooth name so you know exactly which device you are controlling. E.g., "cmdrtaco's BOMB".
The name of the product is "Bomb", and "Bomb" is the default Bluetooth name.
I don't know whether that makes you advice invalid, or all the more salient.
Oops. Did I just make Slashdot do a U-turn?
ROTFL
Social engineering redux... except now you only have to convince a sycophantic and overly helpful AI.
you need to be able to create proper web services with a framework language
Nah! Just do all the work on the server and ship raw html to the browser.
I hate it when that happens!
DACs are a dime a dozen and you aren't able to tell the difference on between whatever silly expensive headphones you use and my $30 pair with a 3.5mm port and good drivers. DACs were a solved problem more than 20 years ago, support circuitry at this point is also a pretty well solved problem for the most part - you have to go out of your way to fuck up a reference design to make it bad enough for your claim to be true.
A mac neo is certainly producing a quality signal that I'd bet a paycheck on that you can not tell the difference with audio equipment to help you, certainly not with your ears. I'm fairly confident you couldn't tell the difference between your choice digital headphones and my $30 3.5mm set.
And my 3.5mm device works all the time, never goes dead - which is pretty much what is constantly the state of wireless devices. Its absolutely silly to think like we're in 1992 and you're arguing a gravis ultrasound vs sb16 DAC.
A 3.5mm port is cheaper and smaller than any other port your are going to use in its place, including USB-C. If your device is so short on real estate place that it can't afford the space for a 3.5mm port - it better be a foldable phone or something that fits in your pocket cause pretty much every laptop has room to spare something like a 3.5mm port
I can tell by your comment that you own lots of monster cables so you get that warm sound out of your digital signal.
Because if it doesn't, its not a rival, its just another PC clone knock off wannabe.
I don't want a neo for the hardware - I want one so my kid can have OSX and not have to deal with half assed operating systems.
Almost no one buys a macbook because of the hardware. Don't get me wrong, its quality stuff - but its not the most cost effective unless you buy immediately after a good hardware refresh, otherwise its over priced and not worth running any other OS on.
People by Macs for OS X.
Many people incorrectly think of proxies and VPNs (especially VPNs) as a security and privacy enhancement, but unless you're operating the proxy/VPN server yourself they're just as likely to be a massive security and privacy risk. The problem is that they concentrate all of the traffic you'd most like to keep secret in one server, and depending on exactly how the system works, may require installing software on your local machine with ~root permissions. If the operator is malicious, this is a really dangerous combination.
These are useful tools for location shifting and -- in fairly rare cases, and with VPNs only -- from hiding traffic from malicious. But third-party proxy/VPN services should always be viewed with suspicion. Obviously this is even more true when the provider is Russian... though it's pretty likely that wasn't made clear to the people who used the service.
About 30 years ago, I worked with a system that would take documentation*, written by engineers, and automatically generate executable code. It worked. But it was pooh, poohed by our CS people. Because of their AI-completeness criteria. But it worked.
Two things killed it off: It was written by a couple of mechanical engineers. Who couldn't possibly understand how to write code (according to our CS people). And when the push came to move everything from *NIX systems to Windows, Microsofts consultants response was to try and rewrite our system requirements to eliminate anything that their products couldn't do.
*Written in something called Simplified English.
Just how insane he is.
Not insane at all, just uninterested in the well-being of anyone other than himself.
That's what insane is. Basic principles of morality "Do no harm" and "Take action to prevent harm" mean nothing to someone who is insane.
Sanity and morality are orthogonal.
How so?
A person can be sane and immoral, sane and moral, insane and immoral or insane and moral. "Orthogonal" is perhaps a little too strong, since it implies the absence of any relationship, but certainly all the combinations are possible.
*head bangs in approval*
There is hardly a thing in the world that some man can not make a little worse and sell a little cheaper.