'vim' is a marvel, and Bram Moolenaar did a lot of good for the world, and I am grateful for that. TL;DR: I started using Borland IDEs on MS-DOS (Turbo Pascal and Turbo C, around 1987/1988), which were based on the WordStar editor commands. I first tried 'vim' around 1994, on my first PC, using Linux on a Slackware distribution (486 DX2 66MHz with 8MB of RAM, and a 500MB hard disk), because for university homework we were told to learn the 'vi' editor, as in the lab we were using Sun workstations. I continued using a Borland-compatible editor for Linux named 'Joe', as I felt more productive. It took me some time, but I ended up switching to 'vim', once I felt I could do it better than with previous editors. Despite using other editors, e.g. Notepad++ and Visual Studio in Windows, in Linux and Mac I still use mostly 'vim', even though it's considered outdated because more modern/popular editors are taking its place, e.g. VS Code, Kate, etc.

... and investigate why the patent was filled. In my opinion.

Turbo Pascal 3/4 had not object oriented stuff. "Object Pascal" was introduced in Turbo Pascal 5.5 (link).

... and fill the "Q" letter in their "Alphabet".

Nationalism is the main threat for destroying the European Union. And that is not going to be good for the Greek people, not for people in other countries. Is a win-win vs lose-lose situation. Please, everyone, more brain and less nationalism.

It is a mistake to discontinue the NPAPI: there are *lots* of commercial/corporate/etc. plugins using it (!)

Please, focus. I don't know what "the market" need. I know what *I* need to buy from you again:

• Netbook: 2-core CPU/APU at 2GHz with decent IPC for 30 USD
• Laptop: 4-core CPU/APU at 2-2.5GHz with good IPC for 60-70 USD
• Desktop: "PS4 on a chip" with twice the CPU frequency for 90-120 USD

Note that, in comparison to ARM CPUs, x86 SoCs are *crazy* overpriced. There are superb ARM SoCs for just 20 USD. WTF are you doing selling similar consumer-grade chips for 100 USD??

No.

"Fuck Everything, We're Doing 4K"... (reference)

So they keep bullying Android device makers with patents, reducing privacy, etc. I see.

Network latency is going to keep all these remote game solutions as inferior. Even with fiber optic connections becoming widespread is going to be worse than local gaming.

That's an example of moral misery. In my opinion.

In South Korea only old people do Low-Protein Diet.

In my opinion, the point of using x86 in order to reuse units from desktop/server CPUs is the base of these experiments. The counterpart is to deal with the x86-mess everywhere. This seems a desperate reaction to AMD's CPU+GPGPU, which also has drawbacks. I bet that both Intel and AMD prefer to keep memory controller as simpler as possible, having a confortable long-run, without burning their ships too early. E.g. a CPU+GPGPU in the same die, with 8 x 128 bit separate memory controllers configured as NUMA (i.e. without channel interleaving/bonding) would be much better, but it would imply expensive chips, motherboards, and more DRAM chips. So I bet we'll have same-die CPU+GPU plus simple memory controller (even with embbeded RAM in 3D package) for the next 20 years (consumer-grade products).

In Europe old people don't expect the Spanish Inquisition :-)