Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop


Forgot your password?
DEAL: For $25 - Add A Second Phone Number To Your Smartphone for life! Use promo code SLASHDOT25. Also, Slashdot's Facebook page has a chat bot now. Message it for stories and more. Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! ×

Comment Re:Intel does not "make it easy" (Score 1) 157

this. One of the reasons I do not even check Intel processors for a new machine is that Intel randomly disable a feature here and there. On the other hand if something is present in an AMD processor generation, then it will be present both on their cheapest and most expensive cpu-s too.

Comment Of course AMD desktops are cheaper (Score 1) 157

Of course AMD desktops are cheaper. While AMD provides a better performance / price ratio than Intel, at this moment AMD does not compete in the high end category at all. If somebody wants a high end desktop (above 2000$) they must use Intel and pay the hefty price premium. Moreover, even if one wants a top AMD configuration now, he will instead wait 2 months and buy a Ryzen processor.

Comment Re:Where IS Java today? (Score 1) 89

I have very positive experience with Java, "write once run anywhere" does work. We moved complex applications without any changes most of the time. In rare cases the required changes was few and obvious, like case sensitivity difference between Linux/Windows. This also applies to Java upgrades too, 99% of the time there were no issues. I do not have a similar good experience with any other language.

Comment Re:Pi reliability (Score 2) 97

I have several Raspberry PI and none of them failed yet. They are accidentally left on for months and come up without issues if a monitor is attached There is one which has been working for years attached to a monitor and network 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. It is running a browser, so it is not even a server with console only. I use them all in a case and I switch off swap on the continuously working one.

Comment Re:If AdBlocking is freedom-hating... (Score 1) 539

If you are panicking because of the additional possibility of cross site scripting then imagine what will happen when web sites starts to serve ads under their own domain name to avoid sneaky ad-blockers. Of course this would be unnecessary if ad blockers were not sneaky, that is they would send a HTTP header or at least a JavaSript DOM object indicating that ad blocking is ON. Therefore the site could decide what to do: reject the user, offer limited content, offer subscription or micropayment, nothing.

I also do not understand what are you doing on a website like Slashdot which is full with user generated content.

And by the way, I also do not understand how did you come to the great idea that I am completely unaware of cross site scripting.

Comment Re:If AdBlocking is freedom-hating... (Score 1) 539

The traffic doubles at the worst case because in addition to the user-server traffic there will be webserver - adserver too. Yes, this may mean that on the webserver side the traffic becomes more than twice larger compared to the previous level. But video ads are only a few seconds, and now it is 2016, we use very capable hardware and scalable software, the average web server of a small site is usually idle. The infrastructure companies will be quite happy though.

Comment Re:The sad thing is (Score 1) 539

Advertisers need to make their adds useful to the people. Allow people to specify what they want to know about,

This is exactly what all ad companies try to do. And this is also exactly why many people hate them: this goes against privacy. In order to serve ads which are interesting to you they have to know what is interesting to you...

Comment Re:If AdBlocking is freedom-hating... (Score 1) 539

You can turn off the AdBlock's "trusted Ads" feature if you want to.

Most people will not do this. Otherwise the major ad firms wouldn't pay to AdBlock. The same for blocking the most effective ads: if only the least profitable ads will remain, than ad firms will not pay real money to AdBlock. But lets hope that some miracle happen and they invent the ad format which is profitable and unnoticeable at the same time.

Comment Re:If AdBlocking is freedom-hating... (Score 1) 539

Clearly you have no idea how the Web works

I am a web application developer. In addition to that I maintain 50+ servers. Including web application servers, HTTP servers, proxies, DNS servers. May I suggest to you to not buy lottery?

No, you're wrong, they will never do that - it will cost them in server hardware and bandwidth to host all that advertising. It would create massive logistical issues with advertiser billing

At the worst case the bandwidth cost will be doubled. This will be a setback for everybody (including visitors), except infrastructure firms. But this will not stop the transition, I know very well the network traffic prices. I am sure Google and others will do everything to make the whole thing technically the easiest. The smallest sites wiill quit. Other small sites may need to move to a CDN or PaaS like service. It might be possible that they have to select a single ad company. This strong dependency will make them weak, large ad companies become even stronger.

not to mention new vectors for click fraud

If this will be the case, then again, this will be a problem for the small sites, which do not bring enough profit for the ad firms to justify the larger costs of auditing.

The whole ad-blocking movement is as counterproductive as it can be. I can consider it as a demonstration, but than again it would be worthwhile only if people were prepared to pay for content. But they are not. The best example is Flattr. Almost nobody use it, even though it is mostly targeted to technical people and it is a very easy and cheap way to support for example the open source products you use.

Comment Re:If AdBlocking is freedom-hating... (Score 1) 539

If you want to show me an ad on your site, then, fine, show me an ad on your site. But I'm not going somewhere else to fetch it.

I think it is an irrevelant technical difference if the ad is coming from a google server or from a - maybe google - server leased by the web page creator. Anyway, now that the percentage of ad blocking users exploded I am sure that within one year a few web hosts start to proxy ads. I am afraid you will be the only one who will be happy with this solution.

Comment Re:The sad thing is (Score 1) 539

There's always other places to get the news, stories, etc.

I am afraid you are a bit too optimist. Most of the known web is ad supported. The only major site which is ad free is Wikipedia. But I do pay to Wikipedia every year. If you mean that you go to a subscription based alternative, than you are still too optimistic: in that case you and me are the only two people I know who intend to pay for an ad-free website. This will not be enough :)

Slashdot Top Deals

What ever you want is going to cost a little more than it is worth. -- The Second Law Of Thermodynamics