Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re: Well, yeah. (Score 1) 56

Conservative politicians made the schools shit and conservative voters supported that, now want to cry that the schools are shit. Cry harder.

Did conservative politicians decide that almost all young males needed to be put on Ritalin? Or that teh solution to self esteem issues was teaching children they needed to be rewarded for getting their shoes on the right feet? or that Or that male teachers needed phased out because all men are sexual predators? Or that schools can assist in transitioning children to a different "gender," and that the child's parents have no right to be told? Yeah, that was all conservatives causing all problems.

Your hatred of anything other than the far left wing is showing.

And before you take the standard accusing me of being in support of all things conservative, I do believe that conservatives played a part in school problems. There is blame to go around. Funding problems, Issues with banning books. You on the other hand, are not capable of seeing anything beyond a narrative fed to you by people who are on a faction of the left that cannot take accountability. And in fine fettle, you don't either.

Comment Re: Well, yeah. (Score 1) 56

Whose fault is that? They didn't raise themselves. Parents keep fucking up and then blaming the product of their fuckups.

Yes, but not just parents. Schools, media, pop culture. All had a part. And the public schools had an outsized effect.

I managed to keep my son away from the worst of it. Kept him off the drugs the schools wanted him on, taught him that self esteem comes from accomplishment, not because the teacher told him he was the center of the universe, and he had great potential. He's doing okay. His Ritalin drugged up friends? Not quite as well.

And the worst thing we taught the kids is in your answer. It's always someone else's fault.

Comment Re:Wait Wait Wait (Score 1) 56

A few days ago, when Slashdot reported this study https://it.slashdot.org/story/...

The headline read Stanford Economist Now Believes an AI Job Apocalypse Is Unlikely

So, one angle says not a problem. But the other angle says that it is a problem. Entry level gets hit, that means that there is no one to become mid to high level. Then what?

The flaw in the assumption that suddenly people won't know anything is that entry level changes, technology develops. People will be hired who will develop as the technology changes. This is a process that has gone on for a long, long time.

Comment Re:Not only that but very very very soon we're all (Score 1) 56

If everyone is unemployed, who will buy the wares of the companies owned by the rich? How will amazon sell anything? Most of Bezo's wealth is held in the amazon stock he owns. If amazon's revenues dry up, its share price will tank to near zero. Same goes for Huang, Altman, Brin, Gates, Ellison et. al.

This, the slashdot resident doomers appear to believe that somehow, someway, the ultra wealthy will somehow remain ultra wealthy after they are the only people left with any money. And where does their money come from? Mebbee they didn't pay attention in economics and math classes?

Things change. Technology changes. At each stage there is a wailing and gnashing of teeth, "Our Jerbs!" we hear, soon no one will be working because AI took their jerbs. Yet if people don't give Bezos money, Bezos doesn't have money.

I came into the work world during the latter part of the transistor revolution, and the start of Integrated circuitry ascendency. I programmed on IBM 360s with punch cards. I went from tape VTR editing, and Frame Buffer 3d animation frame by frame to non-linear editing, then computer only video. Went from chemical based photography to implementing a digital photography process.

Each bit of progress was vehemently opposed, one woman even lost her job, after trying to sabotage digital work.

And the strange thing, while people demanded stasis, I looked at the new technology as an improvement. Then again, I altered and kept my job while some people lost theirs.

AI is in it's infancy, some things aren't sustainable, like the concept of energy gobbling dat centers, but my money is on a process similar to computers going from things like colossus and Eniac to things like the 360's to personal computers to that little smartphone so many people are addicted to.

Comment Re:Needs an official Linux boot camp (Score 1) 59

Notarization is Apple's strict code signing process, which makes it hard for non paying and anonymous developers to distribute third party Mac software. Linux lets you run unsigned software without compromise.

Thanks for the definition.

So far, I've not run into a problem with this....

And with specific regard to my local AI and OpenClaw experiments and tools required for that....haven't run into a problem at all yet.

So, not a barrier of merit.

Comment Re:Needs an official Linux boot camp (Score 1) 59

Especially with AI and ARM64 server development. Having to go through brew, containers and Apple's notarization process makes MacOS not a serious platform compared to bare metal Linux. In a twist of fate it is MacOS that is not ready for the AI desktop. Asahi is stuck on M1 and M2 so can't help you with M6 Macs.

Err...actually, OSX, so far in my experience is quite adapted to local AI.

Brew? What's wrong with that...pretty much the equivalent of of apt-get on some Linux installs, or whatever package manager you use there...

Docker is easy to run on Mac...actually it seems to give a bit more isolation they way it works on Mac...but set up is a breeze and while containerization is not required to run AI or OpenClaw on a Mac, it IS a good idea for security reasons to do so....Mac or Linux!!

Not familiar with any 'notarization" on my Mac set up, please explain?

OH...and running stuff on ollama, you get to take advantage of of the MLX framework for running local AI models....really speeds things along....

So, not quite sure why you are trying to say Macs aren't good for AI work....they actually are quite good for it AND I guess a bit more plug and play to get things set up and running.

And with any platform the more secure you make it, well that adds complexity, but it's worth it....I'd not want to turn OpenClaw or the like free on any platform without guard rails....

Comment Re:These "early tests" are not a good thing (Score 1) 45

Forget Alzheimer's specifically for the moment, we don't know enough about it. In general, early detection means cheaper and more effective treatment, so the interests of the insurer and the patient are aligned, and the profit incentive helps both.

Back to Alzheimer's, it looks like there are things people can do to lower their risk, so knowing early on that you are at a higher risk may be beneficial. Perhaps postponing symptoms until after something else kills you, or perhaps avoiding it entirely. Maybe nothing will help, but at least you have the time to plan ahead for when you can't plan anymore.

As for what's next, dementia isn't the biggest killer, it's heart failure. Eliminate dementia, and people's hearts will still stop.

Don't forget that legally prescribed drugs kill a lot of people.

I've been conducting a bit of a study myself. Of course, it's not a big study. But in my peer group, of the men in their early 70's, most are on statins and other maintenance drugs like ACE inhibitors, ARBs, and beta-blockers All of them look. pretty old and wrinkled, all are impotent. Note, this has been learned in conversations where they express "those days are long gone" referring to romantic interludes.

Wife has been damaged by maintenance drugs. But she still takes them religiously.

On the other hand, I take no maintenance drugs at all. I only doctor for acute things, like when I managed to get Lyme a few years back.

I'm surely not perfect. I have a lot of old Ice Hockey injuries that are presenting with arthritis. Aconite patches knock that down. But I'm still quite capable, if you catch my drift. People are drugging the bejeezus out of themselves, and just creating new problems. And don't get me started on how actual antipsychotics are being mainstreamed for women. (things like Rexulti, Abilify, Vraylar, Latuda) These numb her mind no doubt, but they also present with side effects like Tardive diskenesia, which can be permanent and sometimes quite disturbing, weight gain, sexual dysfunction, "unusual urges" and remarkably - suicide.

Don't worry though, there are dugs for the jerky movements. Oddly enough, they can also cause tardive dyskinesia. Am I a one-off? Could be. Could be my peer group somehow preselects for old unhealthy dudes. But I learned long ago to trust doctors and Pharma like I trust any other drug pushers.

And somewhere between nuts like Robert Kennedy, and the people on a gazillion maintenance drugs, there needs to be a middle ground.

Comment Re: Uhoh (Score 1) 130

"[Racism] is right twice per day" is the phrase that comes to mind.

Racism....where does that come into play with this?

I don't see anywhere where any specific race was targeted or any restrictions were based on skin color, creed or sex, etc.....it just says that H1B (which could be anyone in the world) would be more $$ to bring into the US.

You're really reaching on this one.

If I'm mistaken PLEASE cite and point out where this is meaded out by race in the exec order or rule....

Comment Re:These "early tests" are not a good thing (Score 1) 45

Well, the sooner an issue can be treated, the less it costs to do so, and patient suffering is reduced. A patient that knows they are predisposed to something can often take steps to reduce their risk. Thus, the profit motive is used to improve health outcomes.

What is goal - make it take 20 years to do its dirty work? lengthen each stage? If you think "the long goodbye" lengthend is reduced patient suffering - it isn't.

Ever been in one of these human storage units? a lot of dementia patients lay around screaming when not drugged out of what is left of their minds. Eventually, the mind rot gets to the point where their organs start failing. Fortunately at that point, things start happening faster.

What I wonder about is let's say we eliminate dementia. What is next? Something is going to kill us. In the end, let's say we tack on another 50 years. Where people live to an average of around 140 years. The problem is all of that comes on the old end of the scale. If life extension tacked those years onto my 40's, I'd sign right up. We have a few people making it to the century mark largely intact mentally and physically. They are the anomaly.

Comment Re:What's The Point? (Score 1) 45

If caught early enough, you can make lifestyle changes which dramatically impact the course of the disease.

Of course, there's nothing stopping you from making these changes now.

Diet, exercise, get off your screens and get some sunshine is always good medical advice.

So many of us have been brainwashed into believing that we are at fault for anything that happens to us.

Comment Re:What's The Point? (Score 1) 45

What's the point of this? If you test positive, you get a label and there is no treatment. Are you going to go on Aricept and be walking around like a zombie for the next 30 years?

I can see a small few cases where this test would be useful for anything but putting a name on your condition. I suppose having a named disease is comforting for some. But, for me, having no treatment options makes it rather pointless.

Reminds me of the test for Huntingdon's Chorea. When it came out, it was hailed as something great. We don't hear about it so much now.

So same for Alzheimers. The only benefit I can see, and it's a nasty one - is that the person, when they know how they are going to die, can elect to delete themselves when the symptoms start.

Comment Re:What can be done in case of a positive test? (Score 1) 45

There is absolutely no evidence that you can do anything to slow the progression of AD. None whatsoever. Exercise doesn’t help. Brain games don’t help. Going ketogenic makes fuck all difference.

My MIL was also diagnosed, and while she took "anti-Alzheimer's" drugs to mitigate, if it did anything, all it did was delay the inevitable. If it did anything, all it did was lengthen each stage, although when hitting the organ deterioration stage where teh brain stops controlling the body at all - that proceeded at normal speed once it started.

It means that if you take these drugs at aged 75, by the time you get to age 80, your memory loss will the same as someone who was untreated was at 79.5.

Exactly as my experience suggests as well!

Slashdot Top Deals

The solution of problems is the most characteristic and peculiar sort of voluntary thinking. -- William James

Working...