He's not a genius, I sincerely think he's average to slightly below average intelligence for a software dev. Just look how clueless he really is when he pretends to be a technical guru in front of actual experts.

That doesn't mean he doesn't have some exceptional skills, but IQ isn't one of them.

First, he's hard working, at least in spurts (during critical deadlines), and he's willing to make and implement big decisions quickly. Just look at DOGE, Republicans have been trying to lay waste to the US government for decades, but Musk is the only one to actually do it. It was a complete disaster, but it wasn't ethics or common sense that stopped the previous attempts, that's a legit talent for Musk.

Second, CEOs aren't allowed to lie, but Musk has figured out that you can get around that by building a cult of personality and then making ridiculously optimistic predictions and then sell minor advancements as progress. The result is he has a core group of retail investors that buy his stocks based on vibes and refuse to sell once in. Since these retail investors prevent the stock from going down too much institutional investors also jump in on the ride. It's basically tulip bulbs.

"This isn't hard to look up"
Doesn't look it up, instead asks Elon Musk's shitty Nazi AI.

To be fair, if they don't advertise it, it's probably because it's a part of the silicon that they won't discard a CPU for if it doesn't work. Same with ECC support. Maybe it works 99% of the time, but if you get one in the 1% that failed, it's not a warranty issue.

Motherboard manufacturers and RAM manufacturers are the same. ECC works with Ryzen, but it's not officially supported so if your particular combo doesn't work, too bad I'm afraid.

Wow, that sounds like a fairly old laptop. Certainly pre Ryzen.

Presumably you can boot a CD, to install an OS. Or at least a floppy.

I wasn't suggesting that a failed rocket couldn't cause a Kessler event, I was saying that nobody has rockets that can safely de-orbit themselves in the event of a catastrophic failure. Hopefully it happens at low enough altitude for that to happen naturally, but if propulsion is lost or it disintegrates higher up, it can't really be helped.

Not really to any extent more than in the US, for example. In some ways perhaps less so, e.g. there is no actual law requiring you to wear clothes and due to juries not convicting nudists it is a somewhat open question if you can walk down the road naked.

In this case the rocket failed on the way up, and there isn't much anyone can do about that.

Yes, it's been tested. The key is regenerated at each boot, so you can easily test buy simply writing a known pattern, rebooting, and seeing if it is still there.

It's not an absolute right anywhere, including the US. There are still state secrets, there is still conspiracy to commit crimes, there are always going to be consequences for triggering a panic that gets people hurt.

The UK does in theory have strong protections for freedom of expression, which covers writing and other mediums as well as speech. We get it from the European Convention on Human Rights. I wouldn't say it is well enforced, but it does in theory exist.

It's a bit more complicated than that, because although it wasn't advertised as a feature, it was well known that it was supported. ECC RAM support is another good example. A lot of people, myself included, bought Ryzen systems because they support ECC RAM and Intel doesn't on consumer hardware.

The fact that they kept it enabled and working for years, even unofficially, makes it something that consumers could reasonably expect not to be arbitrarily removed with a software update long after they bought the product.

You don't need liquid nitrogen, you just need to hit the reset button and boot Linux off a USB drive.

This could be mitigated by having the UEFI simply wipe memory early in the boot process, but very few manufacturers offer that feature.

Chrome is open source. There are a few limitations where binary blobs are needed for stuff like DRM, and forks can't use Google's servers for things like syncing, but that's pretty standard.

But how long will uBlock Origin still be around? The developer is now catering to 2% of users. Not just the extension developer, but the people maintaining all the rule lists too.

The other 98% are mostly on Chromium based browsers, which use uBlock Origin Lite. It's got some big limitations compared to the standard version, but it does still block a large percentage of ads and trackers. I can see all the effort going into that now.

To be fair, ad blockers work with too, just not as well a with other browsers. There are APIs for ad blocking, but they are more limited, and seemingly designed to be much more energy and CPU efficient.

And because most browsers are just Chrome skins, most of those will stop supporting Manifest V2 sooner or later too. Any promises to maintain it are probably not sustainable, due to the amount of engineering involved.

Not a risk here though, because at this altitude most of it will decay and burn up in months or less.