Comment Re:Uah no (Score 1) 103
I suggest you give coding agents a try. They really help. You need to keep them on a tight leash, but they help you move faster and often better if you know how to use them. Nothing related to corporate bean-counters.
I suggest you give coding agents a try. They really help. You need to keep them on a tight leash, but they help you move faster and often better if you know how to use them. Nothing related to corporate bean-counters.
Sigh. I'll bite.
The question seemed to assume it was a good question, and its premises were correct. They aren't. In fact, the CO2 DOES absorb incoming IR, and with the same cross-section, as it does outgoing IR. It doesn't "know which way the radiation is going."
Now, any honest thinker would realize that the question was silly, because it doesn't admit other mechanisms other than "blocking" [sic] of IR.
what is changing is how much we trap.
Why does this magic CO2 block outgoing IR, thus heating the Earth but not incoming IR, cooling the Earth? How does it know which way the radiation is going?
Think just a half-thought further, and question one of your assumptions. THEN you might have a point.
See, that's the thing. Cities often have easement and right-of-way authority, if not ownership.A city can build-out whatever they want, and rent it to whomever.
But that interferes with the cable and telco's revenue streams. Loma Linda California tried it and was fought hard.
The vendors also objected. If you make zillions of dollars selling fiber to telcos, and telcos don't want pesky municipalities getting in their way, the fiber companies will ally with the telcos. Telcos don't want to fight with two thousand municipalities, they want to do one big bribe/campaign contribution to just a handful of people that they can write the legislation for. Makes it easier.
Monopoly isn't the right word; the right word is: Cabal.
and probably copyrighted it. Composed it. Maybe edited it. Laid it out on page. Perhaps illustrated it. Did the work.
Needs to get paid.
It's like Harlan Ellison said: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
NOT sucked up into an engine.
NOT guided by an "editor" with dubious values.
NOT enhanced by some well-intentioned silicon spew.
Real people. Real work. Getting paid.
Publishers are looking for revenue. Distribution sources, electronic, print, and secondary markets look for their revenue.
Copyright holders, who may not be any of the above (See Author's Guild for litigation models) are another source of "injured parties".
There then becomes the motivation of content creators, authors, writers, researchers, and others who look at their work output becoming sucked in without compensation-- and this might be the biggest part of the problem.
If creators and researchers/etc stop generating source material, the entire food chain stops, and the quality of output to the ultimate consumer, us, becomes mightily stanched, a foot on the garden hose of knowledge.
Not all products meet a demand. In fact the vast majority of novel products actually create the demand in the first place.
Correct.
There is zero demand for Python on a microcontroller.
Incorrect.
Perhaps the app could be extended to FlockOff, another privacy rapist, now that the code and EMBEDDED PASSWORD has been hacked.
To get something done, a committee should consist of no more than three persons, two of them absent.