Comment Re:Scam (Score 1) 111
With enough *low entropy* energy, and a large enough heat-sink to capture the higher-entropy energy after the process. Energy is a requirement, sure, but it's not all.
With enough *low entropy* energy, and a large enough heat-sink to capture the higher-entropy energy after the process. Energy is a requirement, sure, but it's not all.
Maybe you didn't mean to react to the security researcher's quotes, but too bad. It was there, in the public posting space. So I'm going to drop part of it here:
"I had the ability to delete any of the video footage or evidence by simply pressing a button. I could see the paths where all of the evidence files were located on the file system..."
That's part of the "so what?".
[...] those windowless borders are a horror.
Indeed! Even worse than borderless windows.
Kind of, but with discrete transitions (at least for the neuronal potential in one direction. There's hysteresis built in). The states are pseudo-binary, very much unlike analog computers.
Thanks. I did indeed miss it in the headline, especially since it was misquoted by the OP (but the meaning is taken).
Where did you see the phrase "a software"? Maybe my searching ability has degraded: I don't see that use anywhere in the summary, in the original article, or on the BigBlueButton main webpage.
Thanks.
You must PAY for two mailboxes at PROTONmail
This isn't true.
You can be a princess and throw a tantrum all you like, but the facts of the matter is that WFH is far more inefficient for most positions than having your employees in the office.
Point of fact, this behavior right here is one of the major reasons inoffice positions are preferrable ( from a productivity standpoint ); the childish nonsense is more acceptable in a WFH environment than in the office.
Your two paragraphs contradict themselves, princess.
Yep. That's the flag they're going to use: -ish
That's not the implication here.
[...] the new Representative from N. Mexico[...]
Arizona
The second sentence explains it perfectly fine to a layperson, and anyone used to interpreting plots has no real problem even without the supplied explanation. The only points of confusion for someone unfamiliar with the different models are the are the labels.
This is mainly because institutions and systems that used to teach people how to do wisdom are lost. Modern age has information and tools to process it, but not the methods and practices to deal with bias and self-delusion,
Perhaps those railing against high schools, colleges, and even post-graduate education, need to go back and deal with their *own* biases and self-delusions. The institutions and systems are there.
[...] Which seems to infer that the majority would be capable of achieving high marks in college as well.
"imply"
I see you're trying to post a dupe on
The shortest distance between two points is under construction. -- Noelie Alito