Comment Re:Good time to mention Plasma Bigscreen (Score 1) 160
My mother's basement gets pr0nHub at 1080p minimum, you insensitive clod!
My mother's basement gets pr0nHub at 1080p minimum, you insensitive clod!
Oh but they can spy on you and they do. They record what is shown on the screen, often as periodic snapshots, to determine what you are watching. It does not matter that you use chromecast; as long as it displays on your screen, the TV Can record it.
And they sneak in and swap out a memory card when you're not home?
"Industrial Revolutionar" now. Keep lopping off one letter....
Thanks for typing that out. Note that your answer can't be right, though.
Thank you for this comment. I learned a lot.
It doesn't, they just turned AI on it for the first time.
I.e. "It does."
cootys rat semen
"My Bluetooth isn't paring with the device I'm trying to denotate..."
Denotating it is exactly what the Bluetooth name does. *Detonating* it, on the other hand...
You realize that's the point, right?
I seem to have had a very similar progression. I still tend to think in "/." replacement operators, but it's been perhaps 15 years since I've really used Wolfram Language.
Do you really say "lol"?
"Opt out of all FOG DATA SCIENCE data sets"
What -- exactly -- does that do, how quickly, and what are some of the side-effects?\
Underneath, it says "You will be removed from all our data sets." And yet I doubt that very much. Surely there will be an entry in a database somewhere saying "Device identifier ________-____-_____-_____-_____ requested removed date-and-time _____ from IP address _____", etc.
And does that only retroactively remove data? Suppose they snarf up another dataset, bought from someone else or collected by themselves. Is that data also removed from their datasets, or does another removal request have to be made?
"Science is about a specific process: you make a hypothesis, you set up a test of your hypothesis, you test it, find it true or not and based on that your hypothesis becomes a scientific theory or a rejected hypothesis."
That's the junior-high version of science. The one done poorly on cardboard. It's sad that people still trot out the whole "it's a process" trope.
And yet that one sentence makes more sense than the rest of the post.
Betterbird doesn't solve all of Thunderbird's problems, but it *does* act a little more sanely in many respects, and the search works a bit better on my machines.
Why would you presume *that* from what was written?
It was pity stayed his hand. "Pity I don't have any more bullets," thought Frito. -- _Bored_of_the_Rings_, a Harvard Lampoon parody of Tolkein