Even if not a guise but actually true, it's probably a bad idea for a car manufacturer to get into the auto-drive business because they are very different kinds of endeavors. Those who try to be both hardware and bot-software keep choking, including Tesla and Apple. If the top players choke at it, then a second-string like Volvo is more likely to win the lottery while getting struck by lightning while chewing gum on a unicycle than succeed.

Let bot co's build bots and car builders build cars. Instead Volvo should work to form industry standards so that a bot-kit can snapped into a physical car when ready, hedging their bot options.

How was Russian collusion investigation a "hoax" exactly? MAGAs don't seem to know the meaning of the word, just echo their cult hero verbatim.

Dear YouTube Viewers,
 
This is to inform you that we are up Moutholini's ass,
and too far up to change our kiss-up policies,
so please don't ask.
 
Thank You,
-YouTube's OrangeNosed Management

...gave YouTube a deal it couldn't refuse.

And those who spread medical lies should be locked up! Impressionable people can get poisoned or killed.

I evolved a more flexible Prince that makes catchy deals.

My PHBgpt is down right now.

People tend to hire social-economic clones of themselves, and MBAs being relatively social value "buddyness" even more.

Thanks to AI now slashdot will get mashup dupes that are amalgamated parts of articles already submitted. It will be fun the first few times...

Re: AI can't do new, only regurgitate patterns

It only has to be good enough to fool humans, not cure cancer.
 

> I would hope that a non-credentialed "citizens scientist" could submit work to a journal...

It's fair to request a written endorsement from an established researcher first. Accepting papers from Nigerian Princes sight unseen has been a stupid idea since the first Nigerian Prince scam.

People who were happy to purchase "Bob's Research Digest & Ocean Cruise Guide" from Mr. Trenchcoat probably won't care if AI stuffs it with yet more riff-raff "research" because they probably didn't care before.

Something tells me they are buying scientific-sounding "justifications" for something else dodgy rather than genuine knowledge. RFK Jr's group is an example candidate to claim Tums causes autism or whatnot. Real journals vet submitters.

#ProveMeWrong

There are only 3 viable x86 makers: Zhaoxin, Intel, and AMD. AMD also has a lot tied up in AI, so they'd take a big hit when the bubble poppage is "official". Zhaoxin is too small to matter much. Thus, Intel's minimal exposure to AI will help it survive the bubble better.

x86 chips are still a staple of almost every business. Investors love staples during bubble slumps.

do they just allow anybody to submit a paper for review? That's Mistake #1, #2, and #3. Vet the sending org first.

People likely to succeed in managing a business will be low in trait agreeableness. This is well known and has been known for years.

Despite the apparent implication of "disagreeable" people being bad, it means that such people are more focused on themselves, unlikely to be swayed by the opinions of others, and more self serving. It's a trait that allows businesses to succeed, by having the owner focus on the success goals of the business instead of the success goals of other people.

Contrast with high agreeableness, where the person is more externally focused. Psychologists and nurses would typically be high agreeableness.

Everyone has an agreeableness score, and it's a bell curve. The fact that there are people who aren't "fair" is compensated by people who are exceptionally giving.

to restore balance to the 3 branches of gov't. Prez has been given too much power. If the Prez is by chance evil, it's hard to stop them.