The ability to decode the font is also still proprietary.
AOSP is free software. Does AOSP lack support for color emoji?
It's not an ability inherent in any widely adopted font format.
W3C published a specification for scalable fonts whose glyphs include color information five years ago, titled SVG Fonts. Whose fault is it that this specification has failed to become "widely adopted"?
You have a point about that.
But how useful would a graphical operating environment for a PC without even the most basic editor for its supported data types be? Perhaps that's why Windows bundles Notepad.
And what happens when you go to any website with copyrighted content? You download it, making a copy, adding it to ram, making a copy, adding it to your web cache, making a copy. Yet no one considers any of those unlicensed acts copyright infringement.
If the content in question were kiddie porn, though, a majority would say the user is responsible for the user-agent's behavior. So while you didn't infringe the child pornographer's copyright, you did commit some sort of child pornography offense.
What this tells me, is that users are responsible for the download, but the infringing download has a Fair Use defense.
But that presumes the copy on the server wasn't made via infringement. But the user doesn't know that. So maybe it's Fair Use if the user believes it's Fair Use ("if you didn't want people to download your article, you shouldn't have published it on your web server!"), but infringement if the user believes it's not ("if you didn't want people to download your article, you shouldn't have let pirates put it on their web serv-- oh shit, you've got me!"). Very mens rea-ish.
The cost of not doing paperwork is accepting telemetry.
The applications bundled with Windows exist in part to help the users diagnose whether the drivers work. How many printer troubleshooting guides have "Try to print something from Notepad" as a step?
I'm obviously missing something major here, because except for the SMS gateway, this sounds like Jabber/XMPP 15 years ago. You can talk that protocol on anything (or everything at once), except have dozens of compatible implementations to choose from instead of just one proprietary one.
And the SMS gateway, while that would have been super-cool back in 2003 before everyone had smartphones, sounds like an archaic requirement in 2016 when everyone has a smartphone that they use to access the Internet.
SMS is borderline obsolete if you have TCP/IP. It sounds like people are saying you have to use an iPhone because it's the only way you can talk to
Sure. As soon as you admit that "installed capacity" != "capacity factor", meaning that renewable are still generating only a small fraction of the power of non-renewables.
Or, to put it another way, when you take away the spin - this "accomplishment" isn't very impressive. Your demands for others to kowtow to you are considerably premature.
Nobody wants to be forced to use a desktop computer to see the whole web page.
I was thinking of a news site that shows photo, headline, and first paragraph to desktop or tablet users, but only the headline and a differently cropped photo to users of 6" or smaller devices. This way you can still fit as many stories into 320x440px.*
I thought additional HTTP 1.1 requests were more expensive than repeating any styles or scripts that block rendering of the first screen of the document. Google PageSpeed Insights recommends that web authors inline CSS above the fold.
* In CSS, px means roughly 1/2700 of the distance from the eye to the surface, rounded to the nearest hardware half-pixel.
One proprietary example proposed by a browser/phone vendor.
A particular font may be proprietary software, but the encoding of characters in the Unicode Standard is not "proprietary" in the sense of being encumbered by exclusive rights or limited to one platform.
And if your argument is "I'm not supporting either of them" - if you don't vote for one, you're supporting the other. Not to the degree of voting directly for the other, but you're still supporting them. Because that's the way the US electoral system works.
I could say the nonsense about your vote for your candidate. How would you like it if I said your vote for Clinton supports Trump or Stein? Because by voting against Johnson, it sure looks like that's what you're doing: preventing Johnson from winning, so that we get stuck with whoever else wins instead.
Please don't vote against Johnson. Don't throw your vote away like that, voting on a spoiler. Your vote could have been against the Republicrats and instead you're going to help one of them win again.
(See how condescending that is? Please knock it off.)
Also, True Type / Postscript / Web fonts still don't support color gradients.
And why should they? Fonts hold letter shapes
Because letter shapes in some styles of lettering are more complicated than a binary choice of "this set of points is inside the glyph" and "this set of points is outside the glyph". One example is a font used to represent the emoji characters in Unicode.
CSS breakpoints make it possible to create a design and have it look consistent (not identical) across all possible screen sizes. You can have style/design/personality and still 100% fulfill that original vision of the web.
One thing you can't get with CSS breakpoints is efficient transmission of more detailed information to UAs with larger* screens and less detailed information to users with smaller screens. You have to send HTML containing both the more detailed information and the less detailed information and use display:none in CSS to hide one or the other depending on the breakpoint. Then the user has to pay up to $10/GB** to download the HTML of both, one to view and the other to throw away unread.
If they created a modern WebTV device now
Microsoft has had a modern WebTV device ever since the Xbox 360 added Internet Explorer.
* Measured in square ems, to be specific.
** Typical price of mobile Internet or satellite home Internet in the United States market.
Not all web browsers support ad blockers. Chrome for Android does not, for example. And even on those that do, the user ends up seeing notices like "Here's The Thing With Ad Blockers". I even get that on my laptop despite using only a tracking blocker, not an ad blocker.
Not all viewers of a particular website have a Retina display, especially viewers on desktop or traditional laptop PCs.
Whom the gods would destroy, they first teach BASIC.