Comment Has anyone tried open-source (Score 1) 13
...coding models? Are they comparable to the expensive ones?
...coding models? Are they comparable to the expensive ones?
I want a refund on my See Instant Crater event tickets! They costed me half a bitcoin, dammit!
Musk: "Stupid woke moon, eh, should be locked up or given correctional therapy to, eh, put it into a business-friendly orbit. It's in a socialist orbit right now. Put the socialists in orbit instead, heh heh heh."
Snow, rain, fog, changes in roads, construction, flooding.
Humans fuck those up also. It's just that traffic fortunately tends to be light during bad weather so that our screwups have limited impact. During the last heavy rain I drove in at night I probably made 10+ traffic violations because I couldn't see the damned lines. Fortunately there weren't a lot of other cars around to be co-confused with: the wise stayed home.
And if there is traffic in bad weather, such as work commutes, one just typically follows the person in front of them. If they by chance drove off a cliff I'd probably follow them down. So we have rules-of-thumb that mostly save us, but are highly imperfect.
Mad? No need to assume quite that hard.
I've logged over 800,000 miles under my commuting ass. I'm not mad. I'm feeling rather fortunate I've been able to survive 30 years of mandated ass-numbing drive-torture. Unlike thousands of other VPN-capable employees who are killed every year commuting pointlessly to a job.
Are you mad about the Go Green hypocrisy "justifying" millions of tailpipes pointlessly polluting a planet and killing employees to justify real estate greed? Because you probably should be.
I wonder how the "I only work at home deals with say, the job I retired from. Oh - I traveled - by plane, across time zones, to places we had work, millions of miles not counting the commute. I traveled many hundreds of thousands of miles of driving.
Don't feel sorry for me though, the pay was very good, I could retire at 55 on 6 figures. But if you don't want to travel, then don't travel. You do you. The people I worked with that although they didn't WFH, in many cases refused to travel (they were a group that the institute tried to increase)
Was it worth it? Hell yeah. I enjoy traveling. I enjoy expense account living and per diem. But others have a different outlook. My father for instance, would be happy to never go further than the perimeter of our yard. OTOH, many people find commuting an excruciating experience and would be happiest id they lived their life at home.
If you don't want to do it - do not do it! I'm not claiming that you should. There are many different outlooks. You do you, I do me. I fully support your refusing to work at an office, only from your home. There are many paths, and the one I chose is just different, and one that causes a good deal of angst for some who have possibly as monolithic view of the workplace.
I believe the goal has to be "better than humans" because humans seem to have a double standard for bots per screwups. Bots F-ing up spread like wildfire on social media.
Maybe we are collectively bigoted against automation, but being bots probably won't lobby to correct that or fight for their (alleged) rights, that's probably the way it will stay (at least until true sentience). Thus, I agree with the premise the driving system must be better than a human driver to be accepted.
then it's considered beatified behavior.
Interesting, I was somehow assigned IT for our institutions Macs, several hundred of them. I got perhaps 2 calls a month, many months with no calls
To be clear - I think Macs are pretty low maintenance. I didn't mean to imply otherwise. The fundamental difference is that they store a lot of stuff locally, compared to Chromebooks.
Example 1: With a MacBook, every now and then you will be alerted to an available OS update. You click the button and it will download the update, and reboot. It's pretty painless and doesn't take very long. But the equivalent is even less painless and even shorter on a Chromebook.
Example 2: A user gets a new MacBook, and needs to migrate from the old to the new machine. All they need to do is confirm that everything is synced to iCloud, and then they can log into the new machine, perform any updates, and they should be up and running. This is also pretty trouble free. But again, on a Chromebook it is even simpler. Because their files are not stored on the Chromebook locally, there is no syncing required. And if the new Chromebook requires an OS update, that just generally comes with the next reboot.
I prefer using Migration Assistant and Time Machine for new Macs.
Also, while impossible to eliminate Google from one's experience, you have to understand that all your data are belong to Google if you go Chromebook. I did have a Chromebook at one time, experimenting. It was smooth, and I didn't have to mess with it for updates. Hated the screen. Eventually I converted it to Linux.
How a machine that runs the three major OS' is somehow deficient, is one of the mysteries
Probably because it highly unnecessary to run all three, when one can do everything without the others.
So, my Windows machine can run my Mac only Software? I use a lot of Final Cut Pro Studio. And Adobe CS is definitely smoother on the Mac. Time Machine provides backup of everything, including programs, with hourly backups, multiple custom backups.
And the closest thing on Windows is disk imaging, which is remarkably deficient by comparison.
I have a Windows VM because there are a couple programs that are Windows only.
Perhaps your inexperience with MacOS, and your need to hate on it is based more on ignorance than anything else, because your statements aer easily proven wrong. Thanks for participating.
I agree with you about race but not about whether hate is reasonable when, like all the other native peoples whose land we stole, we did not keep up our end of any agreement and the abuse is ongoing.
"We"?
You possibly mean "white" males - especially?
Until the collective "we" stops with the racism and sexism, it will merely be a pendulum of hypocrisy, with different groups assigned as the other, only changing as one or another group gains power. Sometimes openly racist, other times racist while claiming they are not.
It is hard to get away from - humans evolved in tribal fashion, with us, and the other, and characteristics based on trivial differences like melanin content of skin, and facial features can allow primitives an easy way to castigate the other.
And let's face it, while parading their mountain gawd around as the rationale, the underlying fact is this is a racist movement.
"Watch SpaceX Crash Into the Moon"
What all the hate? It's so weird, they act like someone overthrew their government, occupied them, then forcibly annexed them.
So you excuse overt racism. and hatred. Whataboutism at its finest! Tell the pe4son that hate and racism is okay.
And do you have the proof that the Hawaiians are truly the original humans on the Island, therefore can claim sovereignty?
Now this all smacks of the racist hate of so called "white people", so let's take a test.
My ancestors came to the USA from Eastern Europe, and Italy after WW1, fleeing from oppressive and dangerous governments.
Am I responsible for slavery in the USA based on the color of my skin?
And before you get spun up and want to call me racist because I stood up for teh evilz white people, make no mistake, Race is the ultimate social construct. Race does not exist until human speciation occurs. Humans of differing skin tones are no more races that white and black horses. Therefore it is specious.
All of which is to say, if you believe in race, you are by definition a racist.
Linux (though not all distros are equal) > Microsoft (even with their regressions) > Apple. I do not give a fuck about your anecdotal experience.
Its not anecdotal, that’s you trying to rationalize an inconvenient face.
Well, apparently he does not give a fsck, and we must remember that is the sort of intellect we're dealing with.
But seriously, apparently for some, an update that sends their computer into a reboot loop, or not boot at all, or kills bluetooth, or renames all the song drivers or just kill them, or moves programs into the cloud, or just the ones that are supposed to be on the computer or renames the local user to the to the Microsoft account, killing the programs associated with that, or a lot of others is simply the best, and all others are unworthy. These are verifiable facts If I spend an hour trying to fix a wrecked W11 machine, I could have bought 2 of them. I've noted my classes in here on W11 that every week, new update issues occurred, and were an utter waste. We moved to Linux, and suddenly everything worked. We even broke up early because we reached the end of the syllabus. Mac takes this even further. You can get Windows and Linux running natively on the Mac desktop. I’m doing this on a modest Mac mini M4 with 24GB RAM. Windows 11 and Debian better than my tower PC with Intel gen 14 i7 and 64GB RAM.
And it is magnificent! How a machine that runs the three major OS' is somehow deficient, is one of the mysteries . Maybe we have to swear at it more?
Oh - and my machine boots after updates.
. I do not give a fuck about your anecdotal experience.
You know what I do with people who bandy the word around like it enhances their argument?
Ignore them because that is their argument. Good work!
You underestimate the capacity of natives to sabotage a scientific operation in a remote location...
And the guilty liberals who will bend over backwards to appease them.
It is easier to change the specification to fit the program than vice versa.