Yes. Since when do we do determine scientific truths via polls?

As much as I want to free the climate science from biases and dishonesty, this is not the way to do it.

That said, that 10:10 movie aired by the proponents of catastrophic global warming was a thousands times worse than this misguided lawsuit.

First you pay to skip commercials.
Then they add "premium" commercials that still get through. They charge whoever wants to air such commercials extra money, of course.
Then they introduce an option to skip these "premium" commercials, again for additional money.
Then you pay for that option and the situation repeats...

This happens in other industries, so why not here, right?

Predicting the past is easy. As is evident from the Climategate and other materials, the creators of the models were spending most of their time tuning the models specifically to match past records. Needless to say, such retrofitting does not in any way make these models useful for predicting the future, which is what we actually need.

Solaris has always done great in this regard. Sun in fact has maintained binary compatibility up to Solaris 10, the current production release. It's even a guarantee.

His Beaming is terrible; his augmentation dots are on the barline; his slurs are too thick; his accidentals too small. His note spacing sdoesn't look too hot either.

Donald Byrd, the leading exponent of notational algorithms, has shown that fully automated music notation is not possible without human-level artificial intelligence.

....still, I applaud his efforts as an early start.

The source is not for you to read, but for bandwidth to be saved. You'd probably hate it more if the page took a lot longer to load as well.

Which cost nothing to migrate to and run everything your business depends on flawlessly I suppose.

There's no bright side to a basement. Especially if you have to pay rent.

Yes, that's a fine idea. And if the government had to bear the cost of the innovation-encouraging-system, instead of converting it to bureaucracy and dumping it on developers, you can bet the level of patent office scrutiny to shoot up.

You are missing my point. So many here use the excuse to not listen to someone *regardless* if its not towing the AGW party line. I know plenty of National Academy of Science folks that don't tow the line, and if it was them claiming the sky is not failing. Many, if not most, would use the excuse they are not climatologists.

Big waves washing over cites like some high budget hollow flick is "mostly right". Perhaps you should read the peer reviewed stuff, where the scientists are required to back sweeping statements like "unprecedented" change. You get a different picture entirely, and they in fact don't use such language since the data doesn't really support it.

Previously it was asserted that "big oil" was the money behind the skeptics/deniers whatever. But hay the billions in carbon credits? Na Al Gore should be totally trusted.

Euh... their are more then 13 routes, their are 13 addresses (prefixes) but their are many, many more routes, most of those 13 prefixes are announced in many places it's called anycast and their aren't just 13 servers either. Every one of them is a cluster of machines and as many use anycast their are multiple clusters per 'root nameserver'.

twitter over IRC

Huh? Twitter is nothing like IRC. IRC is real-time chat. Twitter is microblogging (not real-time).

the UK government is looking to be at risk of getting a hung or coalition government.

Runaway recursion near line 2. Bailing out...

"Fortunately for the world, MS just don't know how to create a superior product."

Yes, it would be tragic if MS created a superior product. OMG! It's already happened! Quick, duct tape the Windows! Down to the basement! Oh, I forgot the depends!...