I'm still using a 40" 1080p monitor I bought for $50 in 2011. It's the only TV in the house and we just use it for things mostly made before 2005.

The new stuff isn't worth the time.

Absurd generalizations? Wut?

On what basis? It's unquestionable that the political left in the US has both:
- fought nuclear tooth and nail since the 1970s
- is clearly the most concerned (panty-wetting fear in other words) with climate change.

There is no sane person that can dispute those assertions, gaslighter.

"ignoring the fact that your tech isn't actually the only fossil fuel alternative out there" I said LITERALLY NOTHING about that. Nothing. Are you asserting that expanded nuclear WOULDN'T have reduced hydrocarbon emissions substantially, or... are you just afraid to admit that?

I think wind and solar are great; they weren't meaningfully part of the conversation 45 years ago, which is what I rather specifically referenced.

I feel like you might not be getting enough oxygen. I made a single irrefutable assertion and you go off on irrelevancies as if they matter.

Thanks to our AI Oligarchs, pretty soon no-one will be able to afford a gaming PC so they'll have to rent Microsoft server time to run the games for them.

Indeed. I heard on Twitter that Russia is losing two million men a day now.

We went from "Reusable rockets? That's Nuts!" to "who can stop Elon" in about 10 years.

Rocket reuse wasn't a real thing until Falcon did it in 2017, Starlink came in 2018. It was a chicken egg problem, people just don't realize how close the rocket reuse was to the first Starlink.

Getting stuff into orbit is one thing, rocket reuse is another. Lots of people are still trying to get reuse, and SpaceX is slowly retiring Falcon 9 for the Next Big Thing, reuse of two stages of rockets. Three years ago, that idea was still considered nuts. V3 Starlink can't ride on Falcon 9. They (Starship/V3 Starlink) are tandem projects.

Light is light.

Starlink V3 is not using radio, it's using Lasers. The coherent beam is the key to Terabit speeds. Which they already have. Multipath Terabit Low Latency World Wide Network? Nobody has that right now. Earth bound pathways are limited, especially across the huge H20 Holding tanks between land masses. Space offers nearly unlimited pathways, redundancies unimaginable using earth based fiber.

Here's an article explaining some of the problem: https://arstechnica.com/gadget...

"What good is a phone call if you are unable to speak" - Agent Smith

Long Term thinking isn't profitable in the short term. And it is much riskier to bet long term than short term.

The correct view a blend of aggressive short term with long term values.

Comcast could have taken the aggressive short term and built out before anyone else, AND THEN CHARGED MORE while they were still a monopoly. They still have cable in my house, and I've replaced it with faster fiber for less. They simply dropped the ball.

If only the people crying about the imminent doom of climate change weren't exactly the same group that INSISTED we abandon nuclear 45y ago.

The *exact* same idea with the *exact* same complaints from the Left, the UCS, all the progressive crybabies...can reasonably be seen as having ended the Soviet Union by ramming it financially into its own contradictions.
Is that ACTUALLY what you guys at the Paul Robeson bookstore are all still salty about? That the guys you insisted all along were the "good guys" turned out not to be?

Anyway, the idea that defense = escalation hasn't been a thing since MAD was largely abandoned in the 1990s. Welcome to the post cold-war era, comrade.

...and it is genuinely an efficiency gain: now I can completely avoid 2 shit product families from only 1 vendor.

That's great!

Moderna spent years and years trying to get mRNA cancer treatment through clinical trials before 2020 and never managed to. They might have gone bust if governments around the world hadn't pushed mRNA Covid vaccine on billions of people around the world without having to pass safety trials.

These are also many of the most looked at, most often fuzzed, SAST scanned, valgrind'd things in the world.

I really don't think it will be as bad as all that. We have not seen Apache, Nginx, etc pwnd like this, or OpenSSH, or Bind, or postfix ...

I could go on. I think the actual posture and condition of most of these project is far better than you apparently expect. (I guess we are going to see who is right).

What AI is finding is stuff the other scanners miss, which is stuff where there is a clear temporal component. We are going to see races, toc-tou, probably more stuff like these PHP issues which if I understand correctly is a use-after-free or something you could at least force into that taxonomy.

So there are going to be new bugs found, even seriously impactful appearing ones, but the reach-ability and chances of successful exploitation outside laboratory conditions is going be low... Do they work when it is a VM on you lab server you can hammer away at with 1000 threads yes; when there is a AWS ELB in-front or a waf that has any impact on request ordering or pipe-lining, good luck..

I am not saying people won't be spending more hours patching over the next year or so than they have been, they will but the sky probably also isn't falling

People say that but I think they say it without a lot of real understand of what the web was like when it was born, and second that PHP5(+) does not look much like PHP 4(-)

Before PHP there were CGI scripts/programs, which were Perl, sh, or C or if you were on Windows classic-asp. If you wanted maintainability your wrote in Perl (yeah I am being serious) and if you wanted performance or needed to do something complicated you wrote it in C. Remember we are talking 1995-97 here there isn't even a C++ standard yet! These were you main choices for 'web development'.

PHP let people do what demanded C in something that did not have to be compiled and did require understanding C style memory management. Here comes the big BUT though, all the really good, really useful library code out there was C. All those library authors did not talk to each other so everyone was different in terms of conventions, who allocates the the caller or the called, who frees, are we passing references or values for primitives, etc. All different and php did not attempt to hide any of that as it pulled in those libraries it wrapped them in its runtime and memory management without attempting make their use orthogonal and part of some consistent ecosystem.

It wasn't a 'hack' it just was not a complete abstraction.

That was 'fine' for people who came to PHP from writing C, and were using PHP because it let them make changes on the fly, saved writing a lot of boiler plate request life-cycle management stuff, etc. It all made sense, if you can at it not from C though it was confusing mine-filed of gotchas. It made web development possible for a whole lot of people who never got access to compiler. That was cool, but it also put a lot of power in the hands of people the way the Visual Basic "Declare" keyword did, and unsurprising they did hack-y things with it, cause themselves all sorts of problems..

In the grand scheme of things someone being here illegally and working construction is about last on my list of priorities

They bother me.

They are taking up housing that US citizens could use....everyone keeps complaining about needing more housing, eh?

They are a burden on our schools and other public resources.

They are dead weight on our medical system...in many cities they overrun the ERs of hospitals making it difficult for true US citizens to get emergency care in their own country.

Just a few examples.,,....the US budget would save a lot of money if they were GONE.