Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Predictions versus reality [Re:The quiet part . (Score -1) 98

Simply the Forbes link was enough to confirm this point

Nope. One link is not enough — from the very beginning I asked, that each citation consist of two links: one to the prediction being made, the other — to confirmation/discussion of it coming true. Another rule was, the two links must be at least 5 years apart.

The purpose is easy to understand. A person can privately record 20 predictions of, say, an average temperature somewhere changing from -10 to +9 degrees. Five years later one of them will have made a precise match, and Forbes will write about him. If you didn't know about his 19 other predictions, you'll be impressed... This is why I insist on the prediction to have been published — prominently — ahead of time.

you purposely ignore the arguments

Because I was not asking for arguments — I was asking for citations...

Comment Bubble won't pop (Score 1) 72

They've invested too much into these things. The pushback against the data centers will cause them to be built in China. If you look on Google Earth 3625'27.62"N 9510'39.07"E, 36 3'56.04"N 10026'32.58"E, 3722'42.20"N 9713'20.76"E, That's just the three I've found so far. Couple have a solar mirror generator too. Also, two of the three have a huge reserve of water available. If the pushback continues, you can bet China will welcome the AI Data centers with open arms.

Comment Re: pay for the environment (Score 1) 159

If you let out apartments and houses, you're also going to have to make your properties "greener', or you get penalized in some way. For instance in Belgium you can't raise rent with inflation unless your property reaches a certain level of compliance.

Glad we don't have to deal with that type of overregulation over here in the US.

I mean, it's great if a property owner wants to do it and it is feasible for them.....but I don't like the govt mandating crap like that.

Comment Trust But Verify (Score 1) 112

Facial recognition is really neat technology, and we are all slightly better off thanks to its development. It's also imperfect, and nearly-guaranteed to be a net negative if you fully trust it, without human verification.

If you want to come out ahead by using cool technology, you're going to have to think about how to use it. There just isn't any shortcut around thinking.

If you have something which is only 99.9% reliable, that can be useful but it's going to be wrong sometimes. How are you preventing that wrongness from breaking your system? Insulting (much less turning-away) regular, recurring, paying customers is usually considered a really bad move, generally resulting in lower profits.

Comment Re:Crime has been going down for decades (Score 1) 62

A lot of states actually have five mile an hour laws, where they explicitly don't write citations for people going five over or less for exactly those reasons. We don't want to be punishing people for minor calibration errors ( could be the cops equipment too ) when the reason for the law is to prevent people from creating dangerous situations. 68 in a 60 zone probably isn't most of the time.

However I bet you that same officer watches people buzz by at 70+ all day long and also does nothing. I don't think rsilvergun is actually far off here. I just think he isn't clear on who is fooling who. All the people with influence do like the status quo. Those speed limits were set a long time ago when equipment really was less effective and less safe. The stopping distance in my modern car is way better than the one I was driving 30 years ago and the speed limit hasn't changed. Cops do like the discretion in pulling people over; they may even tell themselves their subjective judgements about the apparent maintenance status, alertness of the driver, etc justify that discretion that they are not being unfair and making everyone safer. No voter really is asking for more speeding tickets (well not for ones to be issued the them anyway). In fact if you ask any of these people they'd probably tell you justice should be blind/equal/... but all their actions don't really line up with that.

Just like the cop/councilman/whoever who believes in the flock camera, he probably believes he'd never abuse it but I guarantee left unsupervised long enough sooner or later will rationalize 'one little lookup of ... because they were ... today ... i really should make sure everything is alright.' that is just how people work. All of these people believe they are 'good' and most of them are by any human standard. They would all tell you they want justice, and most of them know what would really be needed to get it, but when it comes down to it their commitment to the problem takes a back seat other agendas.

I return to flock. Flock is an example. The real problems are:
-Compulsory display of unique identifiers in the age of big data
-Free for all photography of public spaces

If Flock does not ALPN all the things people will just snap a bunch of photos and on phones and Google's AI efforts will end up compiling the same dataset. The costs, customers, use case on the tin might change the effects dont.

As long as everyone is driving around with number plates on vehicles, and letting people snap photos of them everywhere they go in public on connected devices privacy is an illusion. Their real objection to Flock isnt the privacy violation its that it breaks the illusion..

Comment Re:vote Democratic Socialist in the primaries (Score 1) 129

There are still a few primaries coming up: https://www.fvap.gov/guide/app... [fvap.gov] If you don't see a DSA candidate see who Bernie recommends https://www.youtube.com/@Berni... [youtube.com]

Sorry I'm just NOT for dismantling the US like the DSA is promoting.

I don't want to get rid of the senate (although I would vote for making them appointed by state governments instead of popular vote like they used to do)....

I don't want to get rid of prisons.

I don't want to get rid of ICE and open our borders to anyone....

I don't want to stop deporting people that are here illegally.

I don't want to get rid of the Supreme Court.

I don't support govt taking over the means of production.

There's a LOT I don't want to do that leads to the complete upheaval of the US and how it was set up by the founders.

Comment Re:An Earned Future, is Earned. (Score 1) 129

There is only so much an individual 'needs" when the needs of others are considered.

Why should I consider the "needs" of others?

I mean, aside from myself, family and friends.....why should I give a fsck what others need when considering my purchases and the support of my preferred lifestyle?

I don't purposely try to hold anyone back, but I certainly don't pause to think "what do others need" when I'm saving for a necessity or even a fun purchase that will buy me something I WANT...not need, WANT.....

Who the fuck stops and ponders others in this manner in life.....?

Comment Re:vote Democratic Socialist in the primaries (Score 0) 129

The only spasm Russia is having is a death spasm, which it has been having since about 2014, and that has nothing at all to do with the USA playing world police or not.

It has everything to do with not really opening up the Western world to economic participation by Russia in the early 90s because because Yeltsin could not remake the entire Russian economy fast enough for our preferences. We treated them like that gas where everyone pumps and leaves without ever stopping in the quick-shop portion, they have been starving since.

The despair has placed and kept Putin in power a long with other reactionaries and looters. Ukraine was a desperation play too, because Putin had to see that people were going to start asking 'when is it going to get better' and he had no answers. Russia isn't influential, and has not needed any real checking by anyone. That was apparent in the first days the operation, it was logistical s***-show from the start. They have failed utterly to invade a neighbor they *ostensibly* dwarfed physically and economically; because the truth was Russia they were all bluster with little other than legacy soviet projects and no blow. This should have been apparent to the intel people (I am sure it actually was) because otherwise there would have been no need for 2000s Russia to be playing with an Aircraft carrier they can't even service, and finishing construction of 1970s submarine classes and trying to play them off as contemporary boats.

They got nothing now, they had little. What is left is some nukes that are strategically impossible to use due to MAD.

Had we just ignored Russia post 1991, let them trade on neutral terms and let people travely they'd probably have ended up with a somewhat functional government and enough going on at home that foreign adventures to chase false memories of old soviet glory would have held enough nationalistic appeal to be seen as domestic political tool worth employing. At least not beyond messing around in some low consequence easily abandon playground like Syria for more than news cycle or two.

Comment Re:They are NOT making ends meet (Score 1) 129

A lot of people have very un-even incomes too. Traditionally those folks build up a cash reserve they draw dawn in the lean time and build up at 'harvest'; but for those starting out they almost always have used either a gift or a loan.

If you are a farmer you have to buy the seed for *at least* your first planting and you won't have income until you have grain ready for market. Some more white collar careers feature these booms and busts too. If you are sales person marketing stuff large business you might see huge swings in commission q1 when buyers have new budgets, and again in q4 when they spend due to use it or lose it policies. Meanwhile in q2-3 you have people on vacations, managers holding back spending in case of surprise expenses or shifting upper management priorities. My point is not everyone even relatively successful high earners get consistent paycheck every 2 weeks.

what is different here or appears to be, is that so many people are down the wire, and expenses are rising faster than their forward planning allowed for. That leaves additional short term borrowing to fill in the gap. The problem is the gap plus the additional interest expense leaves them with even less to store up for the next slow period. - Which brings is to the real problem for society at large

Fundamentally savings (that make return of principle certain) are pretty inefficient. That usually means capital that simply can't be employed because to do so implies some risk. So the whole economy slows down because assets must sit idle. This is why stable inflation, reliable legal frameworks, and debated negotiated policy with good forward guidance is so important. These are really the secrets to America's post war boom. Not the only factors but the things that let us take maximum advantage of the environment.

Increasingly we have been breaking these rules with one moral crisis after another, where we have abandon principle and the chickens are coming home to roost. It started with with 07/08 financial crisis response and it has been one thing after another slowly boiling the frogs until COVID hit and we really went completely bat-shit crazy, and then spent the next 3 years letting crazy ride. At this point their IS going to be a train crash. You can see it when the treasury department is trying to game the yen carry trade because they have to prevent bond yields from going nuts, but can't actually manage to pull it off mostly for lack real value to inject.

Its going to get ugly but you also can't sell. Because its going to get ugly no matter what you swap into. One thing I am pretty sure of if you have a lot cash assets you will burned badly. People need to recognize "sell the news", front running it will see you punished not intentionally but because the real estate and corporate markets HAVE to be bailed out if at all possible. The government does not want to see people turned out of their homes in mass, or empty grocery store shelves. Even if they wipe out equity values with forced stock issuance they going to be doing the injection more printed money and FED balance sheet expansion. So it is going wipe out the value of cash and nuke the return on debt at the same time. You might think the rest of the world won't let us get away with it but that is also not true. Sure Japan/China/Others can sell those bonds, but that money then must go somewhere, it could only go to the EU, where again it would have to go somewhere lest it trigger hyper inflation there, which would mean wait for it, they'd probably be back buying US bonds.. The dollar still is the reserve currency, so at least for one round here the US Treasury will 'get' to revalue it radically. I could not hazard a guess what happens after that 'singularity' nor do I know when it arrives. Might be a two weeks or 10 years, my advice to any still reading, is do that read the damn news every day because this will happen slowly then very quickly. Know your account numbers, your brokers phone number, how to make 401k withdrawls etc so you can act when it is time to act.

Comment unpopular opinion (Score 1) 129

Given
  I submit there are an increasing number of people unqualified to spend their own money.

I see young people (in their 20s) COMMONLY using door dash and buying $8 coffee, who talk about the cool shows they saw on the 5 premium channels they subscribe to.

If you're door-dashing McDonald's, you need your head examined or simply a grown-up to control your spending.

Comment Re:"On the bright side" (Score 1) 90

Yes, in a sane society allegations must be proved, not innocence. Your stance is ridiculous.

I've asked in the multiple repostings of this story - what ACTUAL RARE BOOK has been destroyed?
Name one.

Old books? Sure. The dumpsters of public libraries are FULL of books constantly thrown away. "Old" could mean a book from 1965.

All of this is vague, the original story is full of insinuations and hysteria.
The original title of the book with the airtag and the other ~1,000 titles in that specific Biblio bulk order were conveniently kept "confidential" (why? Wasn't it munched?).

A discussion on r/technology points out the strong implication that priceless artifacts or sole-surviving historical manuscripts were being shredded, when in fact the actual bulk stream largely consists of uncommon, out-of-print, and mundane non-fiction (such as mid-to-late 20th-century technical guides or regional softcovers).

This is hysteria fuelled by carefully fact-free bullshit.

Slashdot Top Deals

The road to hell is paved with NAND gates. -- J. Gooding

Working...