I'm not sure you can separate "economic migration" and "climate migration". While there are many other ways to fuck up an economy, climate will at some point become the main thing fucking them up - and every economy at once.

They likely also hold the idea that they will somehow increase the birth rate of citizens. It's just harder to put those ideas to paper and in law because they generally sound weirder. Baby factories, abortion bans, financial payouts for popping out a kid - it all leads to unwanted children raised in terrible circumstances. And it sounds weird because it's eugenicist. People always think of eugenics in terms of culling undesirable genes, but breeding desired ones is the corollary to that.

Many countries with lower standards of public discourse and governance than Switzerland are announcing their baby-factory plans explicitly.

For Republican voters to piss away the Constitution and states' rights. Just one fat orange turd who said nasty things and got away with it and they would burn everything in the country down.

It really shows a complete lack of any principles on the part of Republican voters. That's the problem with the right wing they have a hierarchy not a belief system let alone principles.

Then it would by definition not be a hallucination.

lol.
no.

Fucking hilarious.

*distributes the purse

You are correct- the order has no authority outside of the Federal Government.
Within the Federal Government, it has the effect of setting up a goon squad to track down any reason they can find to sue and take money away from States that don't comply.

He has no authority to preempt State law, only Congress does.
But as he has demonstrated with his university funding antics- he doesn't really need the authority.
His newly granted power of the guy who distributes the purpose is authority enough for just about anything he wants to do.

For the same reason we tolerate criminal citizens, I would suppose. Otherwise, you would deport the citizens as well.

I'm quite familiar with the 10th Amendment.

It is at this point that I point out that you have not read the order.
Do you know how I know you didn't read the order? Because nothing in it contravenes the 10th Amendment.

Any time someone challenges you after you've done nothing but read a headline, the first thing you should do is actually try to learn about the topic you're diving into an argument on.

The order does not take any power from the States. It doesn't even assign any kind of new power to the Executive. Congress won't even need to sign off on this.

What the order does, is orders the Federal Government to vigorously look for problems in any State AI laws, and sue the States wherever problems in those laws are found.
It then further directs agencies to withhold money from the States until they are in compliance with the ordered "AI Policy".
The entire thing is some mob boss shit, but if you question its legality, all you need to do is look at what he's been doing to Universities. It's the same tactic.
If you can't order them to do what you want, take away your money until they make the decision for themselves.

Preemption doesn't even apply.
The order also does nothing of the sort.
It just threatens Federal retribution wherever the Federal Government can can find the means if the State doesn't follow the policy.

It's pretty clever, really. There's no way for a state to fight the order. The order is just a direction to the government to find things to harass the State for.

It's far from a no-op.
You misunderstood the point of the EO.

They're not going to sue the State because the AI law contradicts the policy set forth within the order, they're going to sue the AI law for being unconstitutional, written on ugly paper, or whatever they can find.
Then they're going to start withholding Federal funds from the State.
You can read the actual order, here.

They can. There's no order Trump can sign to stop them legally- which is why that's not what he did. The headline makes it seem like that, but it didn't.
What it does is much more insidious. It orders the Government to engage in lawfare and withholding of whatever funds are considered legal to withhold to any state that doesn't follow the Executive policy on AI.

i.e., he can't legally order them to stop "doing something about AI", but he can take their money away until they decide it's not worth it anymore.

It's almost certainly legal.
On what grounds do you think it's illegal?

Oh- you're a doomsday preacher on the corner of Hollywood and Vine- got it.

It's a misleading headline.
The order doesn't try to "override States laws" (I said the same as you- "uhhh, that's not a Power the president has to put in the form of an order.")

What it does, is order Federal departments to throw every bit of power they have at the State if it does not play ball (Sue them for any and all things you can find to sue them for, withhold grants, etc.)

Since nobody has managed to stop him from doing this to universities, I do not suspect they're going to be able to stop him from doing it to the States, either.

Nothing to override.
What this EO does is direct the Federal Government to leverage its power in whatever ways it can (suing for whatever they can find, withholding funds, etc) if the State does not follow the Government's wishes.
It's basically the shit he's been doing with universities.

Since the order doesn't try to set some kind of regulatory rule- and just directs the Federal Government to... mmmmh, harass within the bounds of the law... I'd say it's got plenty of teeth.
I would say, "That's an interesting way to try to overstep Federal power..." if he hadn't been doing it to universities for a year now.