Comment Re:Being too wealthy really is sociopathic (Score 1) 165
More like diarrhea law amirite? High five me bro
More like diarrhea law amirite? High five me bro
They don't send letters because the officer at the scene communicates it to them in-person. And probably handcuffs them, if they drive like these Waymos.
Not sure what he meant, but I was thinking AI usually fails at things that aren't in the training data. "Guy being pulled over for speeding" is a daily sight and should be well-represented in the data, but "emergency" can mean a lot of different things that probably aren't all over the training set, and maybe were explicitly excluded for not being representative of normal driving conditions.
There is no technological solution for a system wherein the people running it have the goal of providing as little care as possible.
On the off-chance someone trying to do good comes up with something, it will either be shut down or co-opted, probably even before hitting the market.
Anyone know if the new system automatically forwards your decryption keys to the manufacturer, like Bitlocker?
It would require 2% of a person's time, and 100% of his bot's time.
From what I hear, a significant chunk of the data going up to Facebook today is already synthetic.
Even if you hate welfare, and want to kill everyone on it - studying the economics of it will help you do that.
Also, this is not about a Brown professor, it's about Brown students.
Most of the US wealth is generated in suburbs.
Calling this out, show me. Also show me an economist that measures economic output by where people happen to live and not where they work.
Yeah, let's instead force people into 15-minute neighborhoods.
And yet the major cities are in a housing crisis because so many people want to live there. Square that circle for me please.
Cheaper housing
That supports my argument.
The jobs are in the cities.
Also to be extra clear the 8th circuit struck it down for procedure, the FTC was supposed to have done a certain type of economic impact analysis for the rule and it could not go into effect before that happened. The court did not actually make a ruling on the rule itself and in fact were sympathetic to what the law was trying to do.
The FTC can re-implement the rule after that analysis is complete and it can go through the process after that but with the current admin they have chosen not to and generally Republicans were opposed to the rule.
If Lina Khan was still at FTC I imagine it would have been done but Sarah Ferguson who voted against the rule initially now runs it. But both parties are the same of course.
It has created massive personal inflation for some people.
Did you literally say it? No but I uh understand the human English language and you mean to imply that is what I am suggesting, purposefully to draw a mental connection for people to justify slandering me a communist. I think I got that right.
Nothing succeeds like the appearance of success. -- Christopher Lascl