Comment fools (Score 1) 34
What's the appeal on losing money to those with inside information?
What's the appeal on losing money to those with inside information?
Of those, Google will be the hardest to replace. At least without exerting eminent domain over patents.
What's sad is that it has taken so long to reach that decision. I thought it was clear they needed to do this back before 2000. (I'm not exactly sure how long, but plausibly while I was in high school.)
That's actually a smart strategy.
It's also a sociopathic one.
That it's SOP doesn't make it any less so, but rather an indictment against our capitalism-first culture.
You kind of need actual viable alternatives if you want to migrate off something.
It's called a private cloud, it's not rocket surgery, we were doing clustering with machines with only dozens of MHz clock speeds and less RAM than most modern embedded platforms back in the nineties.
It is insane that the EU hasn't done more to create local tech companies to reduce their reliance on the US. They need their own version of Baidu, Alibaba, and Tencent (among others), just like China does. It's fine to leverage allies for certain parts of your economy, but the tech sector is right up their with military when it comes to industries where the EU shouldn't be depending on external allies so strongly. It's not like the EU has the same religious devotion to free markets that the US has which would make them hesitant to prop up their local tech companies for 10+ years until they could survive on their own.
I found an EU report from 2025 that suggested it would take $5 trillion to do this, which would be about 5% of the government revenue of all EU countries combined if done over a decade. Just like efforts to become less reliant on the US military complex, the EU should really get started.
Drilling for oil is boring.