Comment Re:A fake problem? (Score 1) 84
If this were the case they would not permit manual selection of the rapid acceleration mode.
If this were the case they would not permit manual selection of the rapid acceleration mode.
A guy I knew had an early Model S.
When he wanted to impress me with the acceleration he tapped a couple settings on the screen to put it into Ludicrous Mode
This was around 2013 or so.
I'm not seeing how this is a problem.
I have a V6 and a V8 truck and both need a manual low gear selection to take off like a rocket. OK, the V6 not so much but the V8 can spin the rear tires in 2WD mode.
I don't let the average drivers in my life use it.
They would hit a tree if they were given a Tesla that was always in Ludicrous Mode.
I'm not sure if Wire has new management but I just recently learned they've gone fully open source, are working on federation, and are using an RFC-specified tree-based efficient group chat encryption algorithm. RCS is eventually meant to adopt the same algorithm.
Folks using Telegram Groups (which are unencrypted, actually) might have a look. Yeah, somebody needs to run a server if you don't want intelligence agencies to provide one for you.
I uninstalled Wire years ago when they wouldn't take privacy seriously (yeah, I filed a bug) but it seems like a second look is warranted.
. But the population is not currently declining. In fact China's population is projected to increase, not decline.
Why do you think that?
Exactly.
Imagine all the flip-phone hipsters being denied boarding.
No shade, it's probably better for your overall wellbeing to use a flip phone.
And the hipsters have Leica 35mm mechanical cameras if the need arises.
> it's also in the user, as he got a mail during his stay
People check email on vacation?
What an odd thing to demand.
Would the $20 ONN sticks from Walmart work better for you?
I have an puck-style device of theirs which is just an Amtel SoC with GoogleTV Android on it. Probably doesn't get updates but then you don't let them have unfettered access to the Internet either.
I've sideloaded Jellyfin, SmarTube-Next, etc.
I used to have a half dozen Fire sticks and have removed all but one, in a kid's bedroom. They haven't banned Jellyfin
I've noticed this kind of thing a LOT lately. Evidently this book is out called Nudge that tells its readers to annoy the shit out of their customers until they 'install the app". Because evidently running in the background and draining your battery constantly harvesting your data and monitoring your location is more profitable than actually selling the service.
I booked air tickets on a website and it was deliberately irritating, pausing for a long time between screens, showing a QR code and saying, 'tired of waiting? our app is much faster!" Hell, even Youtube is unwatchable without a Google account and giving them your real name, address, phone number for 2FA, email, backup email to cross-check databases. And once you've done all that. the jack-in-the-box pops open and it's like, let's get your social, your tax return info for last year, last three places of employment, and then upload a photo of yourself holding your ID. And your selfie cam photo wasn't clear, our facial recognition can't read it. Nice try scammer, your application has been denied. We'll be keeping the info you already entered, though.
China is like this, an entirely real-name internet. You can't so much as order food delivery without all of this. Simply entering the country requires facial scan and fingerprints.
1984 was a warning, not a role model.
"Nuclear war can ruin your whole compile." -- Karl Lehenbauer