Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:I don't agree with age verification (Score 1) 167

I am strongly opposed to age verification.

However, given that the developer faced (according to the article) "harassment, doxxing, death threats, and a flood of hate mail", maybe we need some form of maturity verification? There's no call for that sort of crap. And I really hope that criminal charges are filed against anyone sending death threats.

Fully agree w/ you here

Comment Re:Use an Age-verified flag (Score 1) 167

That is fine. If a person is an adult at 18 in country A, check the adult flag in country A. If she is an adult at 21 in country B, check the adult flag in country B when she turns 21. Just have their parents check a flag on whether or not their kids are adults, w/o telling the OS anything more

I do agree w/ you that this is none of the government's business. even if parenting responsibilities get abdicated by parents. Governments can't substitute them

Comment Re:Use an Age-verified flag (Score 1) 167

Why use a date field, which introduces all manner of privacy and anonymity issues? Instead, you could use flags: unverified, verified-minor, verified-adult. (and for further protection you could opt to leave minors at the unverified state). It might need some refinement since age restrictions vary with jurisdiction. But recording whether someone is at least over a certain age beats recording their exact date of birth.

Fully agree! All that the service has to know is that Johnnie is an adult. There is no reason to know his or her actual age. Which feeds more into the suspicion that this is more of an attempt to break internet anonymity, as opposed to protecting kids

Comment Re:So it's the lawyers and securty weenies why (Score 1) 51

My popup count fell drastically once I installed a VPN. Yeah, I still get annoying ads on YouTube, but as far as popups go, they are squelched. Sometimes, particular sites I need to use require me to temporarily disable it so that I can use it, but other than that, it seems to be under control

Comment Re:Device level will not work (Score 1) 90

Yeah, FreeDOS has already said that they can't implement this, and won't! There is no concept of "logging into" DOS: after it goes through the POST and BIOS routines, one ultimately gets to the C:\ prompt. Then it's up to one to type whatever commands one needs to

I do wonder about MS-DOS though? Yeah, Microsoft no longer sells it, but they recently open-sourced it under the MIT license. So anybody who decides to take that source code, compile it and then use it as their OS would have the same thing as FreeDOS (plus a few more features/commands). Wonder whether MS will be on the hook for a minor who decides to do it, and then use it to do whatever?

Comment Re:Google Pixel (Score 2) 90

Yeah, this law is more about getting rid of online anonymity than ensuring that kids are not online. For the latter, parents are already responsible for that, and it's up to them to ensure that their kids don't live on their phones or computers. Only point in passing such a law is so that one can trace who posts what online, particularly if one is stupid enough to use their subscription accounts to access social media

Comment Re:How to actually verify? (Score 1) 90

Good question. I suspect that this "feature" is a CYA, so that if little Johnny enters his age as 27 and law enforcement later discovers that he is actually 12, then Apple or MS or the Linux companies who are implementing this can say that their system does require age, and that the customer lied. In that case, the legal jeopardy will be on Johnny, or his parents

I doubt that any Operating System company would want the burden of verifying one's age. The government would have to make owning a computer as regulated an activity as owning a firearm

Slashdot Top Deals

Today is the first day of the rest of your lossage.

Working...