OpenBSD users who have mg as their default editor?

It just needs a way to ride systemd

Jensen Huang, Alice Huang....

Are they sure they are not related?

One thing I'm wondering - if both the PCs are connected via USB/Thunderbolt, would the PC-to-PC migration be possible? Or would Windows sabotage that?

That's what I thought. AI has evolved a lot and is pretty capable of writing good code. In this case, it looks like it would have to take the NetBSD kernel, the way it is, and then combine it w/ Alpine Linux's userland. Both code bases already exist, so from what I understand, the AI would have to provide some sort of a shim that would provide the Alpine userland w/ the BSD equivalents of the Linux kernel calls. After that, hopefully, one or more people would go through it to verify that it works as expected, or help troubleshoot and iron out any bugs that may still exist

It might be something of concern if AI was building something completely from scratch. But in this case, it looks like AI would be combining existing code, just providing the hooks for one part to talk to the other

Incidentally, is this the first NetBSD based distro being created, ever since OpenBSD was forked? Something I'm missing - the point of it: what's it about NetBSD userland that makes it worth replacing w/ that of Alpine Linux? There are ways that I can think of a NetBSD distro being enhanced - increased driver support, new software utilities and so on which could give NetBSD the former PC-BSD feel to it, the advantage this time being that it would be available over a wide range of architectures. But I'm not getting the point of this distro

By now, it's its own thing. Once upon a time, it may have been some combination of Mach and FreeBSD and Quartz. But it has gone through enough that it's impossible to claim that its kernel is like either Mach or FreeBSD: it has evolved into something very unique

Only thing about your "hyper capitalist mess": all the companies that have been working on AI have been heavily leaning either Left or Left-of-Center. Grok is the only exception. The idea that AI would do things to empower the side that its owners ideologically oppose is just fascinating at best, and conspiratorial at worst

A couple of questions:

1. Does eigrpd now do a better job supporting IPv6 as a routing protocol?

2. How is its load balancing capabilities?

Right. Only switch to it if you're running it on an appliance, such as a router or firewall. You can convert that router into multiple things - multihoming, firewall, routing, DHCP services

As I noted above, it's the perfect firewall OS, and so you can have that on an appliance. If you get an OpenBSD VM, you can configure it not just as a firewall, but also add multihoming, routing and DHCP services to it. Then feed it to a switch or a WAP, and distribute that secured internet to all the nodes within your network. Only thing that I'd switch from is OpenWRT or OPNsense or pFsense or RouterOS, not from something like Cachy Linux or MidnightBSD or Windows or macOS

If you are playing Steam games, do not move to this - continue using SteamOS or macOS or Windows. Similarly, if you have a FreeBSD server for your web, smtp/imap and other services, just stay w/ it. Same for if you are using some Linux distro for your daily driver: this is not the BSD distro to switch to. It's a security demon, so use it exclusively for that, in the ways I mentioned above

Precisely! It's a great firewall OS, and one can even toss in routing, multihoming and being a DHCP server for a switch. It's not the platform on which to play your latest Steam title - use SteamOS for that

This OS would be mainly used as a firewall/router OS, and so most suitable for "appliances" - routers, firewalls and the like. It's not likely to be one's gaming computer or where one goes to post to social media

Once one recognizes that, OpenBSD isn't what one would install on, say, a 32-core CPU. For such a thing, first put a hypervisor on, and then assign a certain number of CPUs to OpenBSD

They too can use AI to do projects. In fact, those students can do projects that come to mind, w/ AI helping them code every step of the way. Then they can try testing those, and see what they get

This trend is cyclical, and has been since the 90s. Glut in the RAM market leads to price erosion, which lead to a slowdown in manufacturing. In the meantime, those low prices tend to spur new designs that use plenty of it, spiking the demand, then creating a shortage which leads to a ramp up in manufacturing, which then leads to another glut

Unless and until the AI bubble bursts, don't expect RAM prices to come down anytime soon. Also, by now, it's well known that this is a volatile market, making it unlikely for new entrants. Even while it's littered w/ the skeletons of companies like Qimonda

It does too many things. The latest being age-verification, in response to laws by some US states and Brazil. Too much for an init system