Yeah, I don't really get it's trajectory. I'd have thought that by 2005/2010 or so they'd have pivoted to W7 workalike compatibility, due to it being vastly superior in literally every way.
At that point, you could conceivably implement W10+ compatibility at a much lower effort, making it a realistic bridge for people to stand on for modern hardware.
A focus on supporting newer hardware, with a newer architecture, would go a long way to bridging the "I can do windows things not on Windows".
At this point we're talking about a code base that's designed for 30 year old hardware. That doesn't seem to have much utility, especially with the inability to work with modern hardware.