Indeed. There is also a second aspect: This is not a lottery win or the like. It is important that the students actually have the skills or they may just fail their exams later. There is no sanity in trying to litigate your way in.
No? Remember those 32 of 35 Students being provably caught just a few days ago?
Here is a link: https://news.slashdot.org/stor...
So 58'000 cheaters is quite plausible. Also note that these 58'000 students are only asked to prove their competence a 2nd time in person, they are not expelled or denied.
I had some discussion about the "locked down exam browser" in the software used here with my IT Security students. Apparently it is a complete joke and you can just set some OS variables and then run it in a window or a VM without any problem or any detection by it.
Well, this made the news, so, by definition, it is some rare peak-stupid event.
Not everybody is like that. But there is a localized peak in mortality from 16-19 year old people that have no sense.
More like common sense. As in "We are half an hour in and pretty much wiped. Lets turn around." Critical thinking is advanced level and out of reach for most people.
Yes. Parenting failure is pretty much in there. Good parents make sure to show and explain and demonstrate most common dangers to their kids. Going into nature unprepared certainly qualifies. Well, most parents these days do not have a lot of time for parenting and maybe should not have been parents in the first place.
Has nothing to do with AI.
I disagree. The root cause is not AI, but essentially mindless trust in computers. But, as LLM-type AI makes you able to get statements "from computers" on far more topics easily, LLMs make this problem worse.
And if one would ask AI, they most likely would get pretty solid hints what to do and what not.
Funny how you are hedging here and calling them only "hints". Shows a lot. And no, with the wrong query and just a bit of bad luck you can get very dangerous "advice" from LLMs.
And an American helicopter would be 150k.
Only that this was in Canada.
Worse still is that studies show what we knew all along. Giving a laptop or iPad to every kid does not improve their education. In fact, the studies show them to be detrimental to the child's learning.
Yep. I had that suspicion 25 years ago when I was involved a related EU project. All the senior people with actual teaching experience involved though pretty much the same. Most of the others had a no-proof "Technology makes everything better!" mindset, which I found quite problematic. Turns out that intuition was pretty much correct and the senior folks with teaching experience had it all right. (I did not have a lot of teaching experience back then.)
Because the big advantage of Chromebooks is that they are generic and you can even turn an older laptop into one. If it is all web-based, it may not matter that much as well.
Indeed. Nothing new in human behavior, always the same crap with most of them.
And now waste some more. Makes it entirely clear you are dishonest and have no honor.
I see the LLM cultists have mod-points again. Here, waste some more.
If you can sell illusions for billions, there will always be some assholes that will do it.
Feel disillusioned? I've got some great new illusions, right here!
