Comment Re:Poor decisions? (Score 1) 99
Indeed.
Indeed.
Or direct lying. The whole AI mess is, if anything, slowing down as the actual very limited usefullness becomes slowly more obvious.
Naa, just ask the LLM to pretend to be a girl and butter up you ego! I heat some LLMs will even confirm their users delusions that they are a god.
The crapto scam "industry" lost. Full reserves, regulation and audits is what these assholes want to avoid. Now they are getting that and that means they are not really different from a regular bank anymore. As a result, most (all?) will simply have to close up shop, because there is no way they can fulfill these requirements.
Well, if you use fundamentally unsuitable metrics, you are bound to get bad and disconnected assessments. Also remember that this connection between wealth and morality (which is basically negatively correlated from the available evidence: To get wealthy you very likely have to be an asshole) has a religious and thereby inherently flawed source.
There were ample warnings and nobody that did any real research would have ever used that sub unless they were suicidal.
I don't believe that's accurate.
You believe wrongly. That typically happens when you supstitute belief for rationality.
Indeed. Such unrefined cretins.
The difference is that Elonia went for highly experimental and got lucky, while Honda is more the low, solid engineering type. They will not run into walls, unlike Elonia seems to have done now.
Edison was wrong back then. He would have been right today, but only because very iompressive power semiconduictors and computers are available now.
Why would it matter that the government is "left wing" and why is this written like not immediately providing an explanation but waiting for the analysis results were a bad thing? It is not. It is the sane and competent thing.
Nobody that actually looks and is willing to assess the results without prejudice is seeing it. My 2nd Semester coding students (engineering in a non CS field) are not seeing it. Their assessment was "often faster for search than looking at the docu, but cannot code for shit". And that is in Python where a lot of example code is out there.
Maybe they'll gift him another Jet that he can't use. Its more likely they'll continue to tell him to fuck off.
Yep. The Chinese looked at the facts and found them to be in their favour. They might have trouble understanding why that does not work for the Dumb one.
All about show, never about doing anything effective. About the worst kind of leader you can have besides a true believer.
Indeed. Not that this is a surprise.
Yes. But shocking? Not really. There were ample warnings and nobody that did any real research would have ever used that sub unless they were suicidal.
A bug in the code is worth two in the documentation.