So, if they are putting up cameras without permission / without contracts then it shows clearly (as if we didn't already know) that even their supposed customers (the police depts) are just a means to an end - to get that data for the REAL customers - which I am sure are big gvt and data brokers

We live in the stupidest / shittiest timeline.

Closer to the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy tradition. All they need are the words "Don't Panic" on the front cover.

If it doesn't, it has no real value.

Almost nothing on Wikipedia is true, but all of it is "verifiable" in that there's at least one published source making the claim. Even if 99.9% of all other sources say the opposite.

(The Haka is not, for example, a war chant. Which is attested to, but because it's claimed to be online, it is "verifiable".)

The number of errors is huge, the number of "official editors" who know anything about the subject is extremely small, and this has always been the case. This is why nobody reputable cites Wikipedia. Wikipedia is where you go to find out what is potentially interesting, but you ALWAYS obtain the facts from elsewhere, if you've any sense.

Your best engineers will be AuDHD, and AuDHD folk don't do well in these sorts of synthetic tests.

I can code in 20+ languages for over 12 different OS', write code that's good enough for CERN to run for particle accelerator data collection for a decade, have accelerated systems by an order of magnitude by understanding the poem space better than their previous engineers, but I am abysmal at exam style settings.

The software industry is riddled with SEs who write abysmal code but can pass a coding test easily. They're the folk that you have always needed to reject but didn't because they ticked a box.

The DOD/DOW have been working on this for a while. They discovered, early on, that the device had a propensity to cause permanent nerve damage.

It's very unlikely the US have fixed that, as they'd largely sidelined the work as a failure. However, at 36%, Trump needs something he can call a win, no matter what the long-term consequences.

2001: Windows XP ran on as little as 64mb with 128mb being the recommended.

2021: Windows 11 minum is 4gb is listed as the minimum. I've never even touched Windows 11, so I don't know if that is realistic.

The minimum specs for each system is a 64x multiple, as you said. That's a good observation. I'm pretty sure in the late 90s I was running Windows95 with 96mb and my motherboard was capped at 128mb. Negligible ram on the graphics card. It also could have only been 64mb. I don't have a clear memory of what I was running when I first got XP.

Today my PC is a partially upgraded (old) i7-4790k with 32gb ram and 10gb of ram on the video card, so approximately 448x increase in memory in ~25 years.

My Mac is 256gb unified, so ~2,730x multiple.

Still not to the Moore's Law rate!

This is probably the best sentence (and post) that I have read on Slashdot in some time. Amen.

Another thing that I have found Claude is really good at doing is taking an error from a log and doing a deep dive analysis of what happened. I give it read-only database access, access to www logs, access to application logs, access to a checked out source tree, etc. I paste in the error message (or in some cases paste in a tech support email from a user) and have it write up an analysis, a proposed response to the customer, and any recommendations (if there is a bug or actual problem).

this... tracks.

I've been using Claude Code at work for a low-stakes project so that my company sees me being all "AI forward" and stuff (They're really drinking the Kool-aid) and yeah I'll admit its been doing OK on the project.... and yeah I see where you're coming from, there is a certain prose about how it outlines/summarizes things that feels familiar here.

I would really like a true new browser that doesn't use WebKit, Chromium or Gecko (and don't get me started on Goana) but I question such a tiny team being able to do so securely and in a manner that is actually maintainable. I WANT it to be true but I have my concerns and the AI summary thing just kind of puts the icing on the cake.

...Modern ejector seats cause spinal injuries from which full recovery is "unusual". Smashing the spines of pilots might not be the most effective way to boost morale.

$22,000 per hour. The F35 will be nearer $42,000 per hour. These are under-estimates, as they do not include price hikes, crashes that close businesses, crashing into businesses, crashing into heavily-populated sports centres, etc.

I've been using Claude to both understand and assist in writing new code in DB/C, an obscure dialect of another pretty obscure language called PL/B or DATABUS -- all of which are descendants of (or highly influenced by) COBOL. It's pretty fantastic. It's a codebase that is ~50 years old, hundreds of thousands of lines, with code spread throughout modules, with jump tables and gotos everywhere. The code itself is easy to read and understand, but the flow is not!

The fact that they're so proud of "her writing 100,00 lines" no, she prompted AI and it wrote 100,000 lines of code. And if she wants to add a new feature, chances are good AI will just tack on more to it without following SOLID principles, leading to massive bloat and duplication, and a codebase that nobody can maintain - that AI just basically has to rewrite or kludge shit in.

Congratulations, you've built a kludge tower....

We're now adding a ton of very bloated, completely opaque AI vibe coded projects to the dependency stack in a way that makes the they don't reinforce each other and just sort of like a "code stripeset" may well increase speed (of development) but at the cost of incredible fragility.

I just need to wait till XKCD says it in a far more clever way so I can point and say "YEAH THAT"