First, eat a dog.

> that in voting precincts are local, so there are likely to be people there who know the person voting

Most such fraud would be done in bigger precincts, not small towns, so as to blend in better.

> so if it goes bad, you're right there to be caught.

Somebody who ready to run can outpace Barney Fife.

> you have to research the particular details of a specific person.

I'm sure Putin and Xi have a copy of everyone's drivers license.

From the 30's to 60's one got too much lead from rigged gas, and 70's+ microplastics.

Gotz more! Names Jimmy Kimmel called Don: Trumple Stilskin Trumple Orangeskin Troompa Loompa Donny Boo Boo Cheeto Chief Unhappy Gilmore Commander in Beef Mar-a-Lardo Donny Bone Spurs Colludicris El Crappy-tan Hairy Poppins King Tutan-con-man Abra-scam-lincoln Douche-olini Typhoid Donnie [got staff sick] Flabbio Tangerine Twitter Machine Tandalorian Darth Tax Evader Jabber the Hutt Orange Julius Caesar Spready Krueger [Covid] Dingus Khan Putin's Pee Pee Pal Lie-ger Woods Tweety Gonzales Tanny Soprano Q-A-Don Dictator Tot Quid Pro Combover Prisoner-Elect Star Spangled Tanner Gaseous Clay Smellvis Yellvis Fibberace Reich Tyson MAGA Teresa Pork Choppo Commander & Thief Tannie Oakley Magaroni & Cheese Scamburglar Gassolini Groper Cleaveland Mar-a-Cloggo Vladimir Gluten Carrot Bottom Tannibal Lecter The Tanchurian Candidate Kim Don Un Donye West Genghis Don Burger Jean King Julius Squeezer Uncle Scam Merrill Flinch Keester Bunny King Hungry the Eigth Petty Rosevelt Gangus Conman Lie-a-tollah Founding Frauder

---From others:---
Moutholini Mango Mussolini Don Laden Don Qaeda Hitliar Agolf Shittler Agolf Tottler Fattler ADHDolf The Count of Mostly Crisco (from Colbert) Cheeto Corleone Don Snoreleone Dozo the Clown The Nod Father Flush Gordon Hannibal Leakter Tribble Top Mess-iah Sharticus Farticus Coupy McTintFace King Tint-Uncommon Darth Vapor Donvict Nobel Price Ferrel Pharaoh Mango Unchained Tinted Toddler Yosemite Yam Flaky McCakey Bruisey McSnoozy The Great Fatzby Blob the Builder Teddy Dozevelt Dr. Strangelump Clowntator

(sorry about the formatting, Slashdot didn't like the original)

The world's in decline. The rich are fucking it up.

Party like it's 2019!

Lets send Musk to Mars to test that theory ... one way trip.

...the Trump administration banned "bi"

It's productive in the sense that it brings clarity to what the fuck one is talking about, instead of leaving people to wonder. Your observation is well-made, however.

Well, if they're trained on average forum users...

Of course it's a POS, it's a Ford. But I'm not mad at the Maverick for having the form factor that it has, I just don't think it's a truck by any reasonable definition any more than a RAV4 or CR-V is a SUV. If it's based on a car platform, it's a car.

Ironically for this whole conversation I think most people who buy full frame pickups would be better off with something else, Most pickups will never tow and most 4WD pickups will never go off-road, at least not under the original owners. But I also think that there's a real market for a full frame EV pickup, and it would sell both to people who should and shouldn't buy it based on how they actually use the vehicle.

Nope. It's just not what I am interested in, and also, there's a whole bunch of old guys who have been asking for a simple electric pickup with this kind of functionality. Older than me, I mean. I've talked to them about it when I worked at the RV shop, it came up surprisingly often. There's a market for an old school sized small EV pickup, but it has to be full frame. Just make the frame wider and put a battery between the rails, FFS. It can have IRS or a live axle, it doesn't matter because a smaller pickup doesn't get so crashy. Put a double wishbone in the front and it will handle fine.

I am not against any kind of car existing, and I think most pickup buyers would be better of with minivans. I just know that the market has been ignoring this not very profitable per unit segment for obvious reasons, but would like to see it explored. I, too, am interested in that type of vehicle. But it's hard to get a car company excited about making a vehicle which is maintainable. Ford fucked up big time in the eighties and came up with a pickup and engine that would last for decades, and they haven't wanted to repeat that mistake. (F-150 with a 300 and a 5 speed, ofc.)

IME on home gear it's off, and on servers it's on, but I am not working on PCs for a living right now so I'm not super up to date.

A lot of people filter ICMP on their networks. Probably more people should do that.

My bro-dozer (1992 F250 7.3 w/ATS 088) is long gone (pinholing from cavitation) and I am just going from a hatchback with a 1.8 L4 (2008 Versa hatch 6MT) to a CUV with a 2.5 L4 — A pre-dented base 2011 RAV4 AWD. I WFH 4 days so the reduced MPG won't really affect me.

But, if I am going to buy a pickup, then I want it to have a frame. And if it's an EV, I want it to have either a non-integral or reasonably rebuildable battery. Cars are great, I love cars, I've owned literally dozens of cars and only one pickup. All the pickups worth owning (Toyota this and that) are big moneys up here. I did consider getting a Ridgeline, because if I'm going to have a cruck I want it to be a Honda and not a Ford, but I couldn't find one in my price range.

Full frame pickups have more life in them. And preferably, not some kind of foofoo frame like the Lightning, either. I don't even need IRS, thanks. Just give me an electric live axle and call it good! And there's a ton of fogeys far older than me who would buy the same thing, they've been– well, not shouting out, but at least quietly asking for a simple, affordable EV pickup which works as a generator. So if this is that, then my hat is off to Ford for delivering exactly the thing people have been asking for. And if it isn't, then my response is meh, another Ford. But I think Korean EVs prove that even an automaker that's kind of crap at making cars can start making pretty good EVs, so even I might be willing to give Ford another try.

I can already, completely above-board, sell someone a block of DRS'd IBM shares for crypto if I want to. Let's all be clear this isn't about denominating stocks in Bitcoin.

Rather, this is effectively about recording stock transactions on a blockchain. Nothing more and nothing less than swapping a distributed transaction log for a traditional ledger.

The implication is clear, the SEC is at least considering the idea of creating shares as a token cryptocurrency. In this case, the tokens are backed by real shares. That's not a technical requirement, though, and a future company might someday skip the major exchanges entirely to list only as a token. To be clear, there's nothing sacred about the exchanges and their "house rules"; there's nothing inherently wrong with using a blockchain vs a ledger; and to reiterate, this has nothing to do with "buying stocks with Bitcoin".

On that last point, I consider OKXICE's decision to accept payment in some nondescript "stablecoins" as extremely unfortunate. Not because I'm a cryptophobe, but because it muddies the waters as to the viability of the core concept of tokenized equity itself - Though that's a bit of a tautology, given stocks are already "tokenized equity". Whether we denominate them in USD or BTC or cowrie shells is an entirely separate issue.