Or we could point to the confounding factors they obviously did not address in the study, say "this study is trash no one should ever refer to or even read" and move on. You don't necessarily need a new study to invalidate a study, and this is one of those cases where you don't.
It's too bad you don't know dick about luddites.
"Leaving aside the fact that you don't know the difference between an LLM and a frontier AI model"
One thing is a subset of the other. That was a weird attempt, and it failed.
We didn't used to carry telescreens in our pockets, so that's different.
Before streaming it wasn't feasible to deliver different media to different viewers, either. They all got the same things from the same channels.
TBF the stupid Nazis have been around. They were just a little quieter most of the time, except when they were burning a cross, or dragging someone behind a pickup.
Maybe they can get compilers for some more architectures first
Yeah that changes the context somewhat. There's a difference between "We should remove the bi-annual time change, it's unhealthy" (which I agree with and would like to happen) and the wishful thinking "WhAt iF iT wAs SuMmEr aLl yEaR rOuNd" crap that seems beloved of legislators and others who sort of agree that the bi-annual time changes need to go, but have the worst idea of how to implement it.
This paper isn't advocating for keeping bi-annual time changes. It's advocating for standard time. And I agree standard time is probably a better approach, even if some people get butt hurt about the idea of it not still being light at 9pm in the middle of August.
It all depends on who you are optimizing for.
There is no one correct answer, because which one fits your circadian rhythms better depends entirely on what time you wake up.
The Emmys are advertising. If fewer people consume them, that's a loss.
I wish I had a local PBS station. I get one broadcast with three digital channels, at least one of which seems Christian and all of which are shit. And since they split their bandwidth three ways, they all look like shit, too.
No, edge is the least safe browser. It's even worse.
They are arresting and sometimes deporting people who met all of the requirements. They are also doing international family separation, and forcing children to appear before a judge without legal counsel. Shit like that is how we know that maggots only actually think about the children when they're horny.
Which was also rumored to be the work of Christians
I figure it was the same as the reason Elon bought Twitter, kinda. They got it as part of a larger purchase so that's different, but the goal seems to be the same - destroy what's good about it so that the people who were accomplishing things with it stopped. We used to have discussions here that moved conversations forwards... Occasionally anyway.
Tolerance of abuse is enablement, but enablement of abuse is all you want because you want to be enabled to abuse, so that checks out. You have that in common with all rapeublicans. That's why you all voted for the child rapist, you admire his rapes.
Not to mention that Trump is also a white supremacist, and there's lots and lots of evidence of that available.
"If there isn't a population problem, why is the government putting cancer in the cigarettes?" -- the elder Steptoe, c. 1970
