Comment Re: news "that matter" ??? (Score 1) 109
Global AI tech spending is said to surpass 2.5 trillion this year.
Sorry, Gates is a small fish in that pond.
Global AI tech spending is said to surpass 2.5 trillion this year.
Sorry, Gates is a small fish in that pond.
My thought as well.
Sure enough,
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Duck...
most of us don't need it.
"OLAP". Now there's a name I've not heard in a long time.
Obviously NYT is just about narrative construction but it would be nice to know some figures like:
* what is that in percentage of researchers?
* and grants
* how many are typical in a year?
* what is the net in each direction for this time period?
* and for a typical year
I happen to know rwo researchers who got a position in Canada and several Canadians who got positions at US schools. That just seems normal from my limited perspective but maybe it's just because I feed them Molson and poutine so they keep coming around.
Remember, numbers given without percentages and percentages given withouts without numbers are always propaganda.
This has been your Defense against the Dark Arts class for today. Do your homework.
Saved from Claude by
As if the world's problems are unrelated to each other.
The two articles were probably written by two different ghost-writers.
AI isn't actually smart. It's an at best average intelligence thing with an insane amount of available knowledge. Like the village idiot with eidetic memory.
As soon as you do any work with AI that's not available as a ready-to-apply solution from its training data, you begin to notice how much you need to correct it, keep it on track, remind it of basic constraints you already mentioned five times, etc. - it's performing at a level I'd accept from an intern, but not from a co-worker.
What it does have is data. Tons of data. Any question that would take you and me half an hour on Google and Wikipedia to answer it can answer in 10 seconds. That's a great tool. It is not intelligence, however.
How is this "news that matter"?
Bill Gates is an old man who has zero AI credentials and has long ago become irrelevant. Not to mention his previous predictions of future developments are not exactly brilliant.
lol
Welcome to the 21st century, you might have to catch up on a few things. Start with Mozilla Media Engine and AVFoundation / WebKit Media Stack.
Your website sends me an H.264 stream (or whatever you decided you'll use). It doesn't need to know shit about my graphics hardware.
Have you tried doing carnivore for thirty days?
I did the beef / tallow / salt only thing a couple years ago and it gets old very fast but the metabolic changes hit fast after about 15 days.
Surprisingly it was cheaper than a regular grocery bill (not counting labor for roasting).
Probably a bit better with a CGM but I only had test strips.
I dropped 15 lbs which wasn't my primary goal but could have kept it up if I needed to lose more weight.
The new system is simply another set of inputs. You will still get search results even if you don't click on anything. In fact, I would bet that actual user interaction with this new system is going to be very small. Most of the input that Google will get will be people trying to game the system.
Watch the video of the EMT's loading the ambulance at his home.
If they were any more non-rushed they would have had time for a card game.
If there were even the faintest pulse they would have screamed out of there with sirens blazing.
But TPTB didn't want Massie running in a special election.
Day by day the populous is realizing that "Democracy does not exist".
I didn't even know about Kagi. In fact, it has been a long time since I have even considered using someone besides Google. I just resigned myself to the idea that things were forever broken. Thanks for the insight.
"How might the attorney general address these issues?"
By achieving enough name recognition in the general population to win a US House or US Senate election and move to Northern Virginia for the rest of his life, returning "home" to Alabama only for reelection campaigns.
Some people claim that the UNIX learning curve is steep, but at least you only have to climb it once.