The big critique about capitalism is wealth inequality - it invariably leads to some people getting most of the money, and everyone else getting very little money.
It's not really about inequality. It's about a system where man abuses man. If we had a system where man does not abuse man, then the communist ideal has been achieved even if the state doesn't entirely own the means of production.
We had air superiority in Afghanistan for 20 years. And Vietnam before that.
AND Iraq. None of those were military losses. The military did its job, what it was asked to do. The military is a tool, and America's is a sharp one.
Moreover, your explosions are not all powerful. Some things will be underground.
Yeah, it might take some boots on the ground. Some operations require that. But soldiers are part of the military. Look at the casualty numbers in this engagement to get an idea of what air superiority does for a military: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Let's be clear: Attempting to prevent the customers that 'bought' your product from repairing them is NOT capitalism. Capitalism is all about the free market.
If we're going to be clear, "capitalism" doesn't have a clear definition. It's used differently in different contexts, often with the meaning of "not communism."
It's better to use a different word. For example, you could have said, "The free market wins again" since that is what you actually meant.
Make sure your code does nothing gracefully.