How to know someone has done no research at all into the situation. You're just a reflexive US hater.

The entire problem of self-driving technology is edge cases. Every self-driving car can make a great demo video, and that's been true since the 90s.

To compare and see which one is actually better, you need to look at data, and that's something we've had trouble getting from American manufacturers AND Chinese manufacturers. So don't even start saying which one is better.

*glances at Enron

Actually, that sounds truly brilliant. Let's raise the legal requirements so that happens...

It may be the primary selling point of AI.

Yeah, AI hallucinates, it gets things wrong; but consider that the majority of people don't know simple statistics. AI will give much better answers than they could have gotten themselves.

Not all reactions to external stimuli are feelings.

These are set up as areas served only AT&T. People who live in such zones have to bring boxes of carrier pigeons around by horseback if they want to communicate person to person.

You didn't read your own link. When Microsoft (or the users in general) finds out about the vulnerability, that is day 1. Before that is day zero.

If Microsoft found out about the exploit on the third of April, then that was day one.
Then day two was April 4th.
Day three was April 5th.

Etc. you should be able to do this kind of math.

VeraCrypt is a particularly strong full-disk encryption, although you don't hear much of companies using it. However, BitLocker security issues keep getting mentioned and it looks like VeraCrypt fixed a number of theirs. However, code quality seems to be listed as unclear on some sites. Not sure how true that actually is though.

BestCrypt is another, but I'm not happy they permit fragile encryption schemes, as those could potentially be used by the software as standard for something important. Being commercial software, that wouldn't be easy to check.

BitLocker seems to be a typical Microsoft failure in terms of what it does, used only because it's Microsoft and that gives CTOs and CFOs someone to blame.

It's almost certain that the "perverse effect" was intentional, and some at Harvard want to pit students against each other as a reflection of real world corporate politics (and government politics).

Next time file the report through a lawyer.

It helps if you contact a lawyer to contact the police instead of contacting them yourself.

Sometimes they do pull people over for tinted windows though, for whatever reason.

AI in its present state has a lot to offer the humanities. Textual analysis alone, a major area of literary and historical research in these very institutions, will now go into overdrive. Those who choose to stay away from generative AI will still benefit from its ability to help search, sort and summarize.

At least some of this will be stress. If you're enjoying something, then you won't be stressed. If you're feeling positive and delighting in what you do, then you won't be stressed in unhealthy ways. This looks similar to the Mozart Effect, which turned out to be that if you liked something, your brain functioned better.

Yes, charging around the stage playing rock music isn't exactly gentle, but it IS extremely good exercise for the heart and the rest of the body. Again, that's going to have positive effects.

(We can ignore Keith Richards in this model, as he's older than the universe and only created it as a place to store his guitars.)

Match fixing is a thing but in the major sports, the TV revenue is larger than betting revenue by several orders of magnitude.