Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!


Forgot your password?
Compare cell phone plans using Wirefly's innovative plan comparison tool ×

Comment Re:Contribution limits? (Score 2) 75

There are two types of federal campaign limits. Those to candidates and those to political action committees (PACs). Candidates have some limits, but PACs lost those restrictions in the suprime court ruling known as Citizens United. While candidates and PACs can not coordinate, many politicians have their own PACs dedicated to their pet interest. Another pernicious effect of Citizens United is that disclosure rules do not apply to most of these organizations. The truth is we no longer have any idea how money is being dumped into US politics. We do know that the Koch Brothers had planned to spend $899M on the US elections this year, but the republican primary did not turn out to their liking so they be spending a bit less than planned.

Comment Re:try this (Score 1) 159

While the story is for the EU, in the US at least, write a polite, but firm letter to the chief or general legal council. A letter the the CEO of a big company may just get intercepted by an admin and shipped down to the "tier-1 monkey" you mention. Lawyers seldom get letter they can blow off and will by habit read it before shipping it off to the meat grinder of tier-1. If you can't find their legal eagle then any person in legal will do. LinkedIn is your friend here. Smaller companies may only have outside council to contact. The other place to hunt for help is to see their "about us" pages and find their advisers, investors and leadership, and reach out to those people. If they get a call from their VCs you can expect your issue will get noticed.

Comment Auto Pilot is old news (Score 1) 147

Electronic Charts and Display Information Systems are old news (ca 1990). These smartish autopilots were required for large vessels in the wake of the Valdez disaster. There will always be a critical need for crew on board to handle unexpected failures: anybody see Our Finest Hour"?

Comment Simple Permanent Fix (Score 3, Interesting) 664

You can do what I did, go to Frys with a wheelbarrow full of cash and buy a Mac. I'm an embedded firmware developer and often need windows based compilers for microcontroller development. (sorry, not everything iCPU is supported by open source compilers). After I was forced to work under parallels for windows work last year I have never looked back. Even windows is more stable under osx. It is hard to blame microsoft developers for all the instabilities as every peripheral maker drops their own conflicting and half baked drivers into the mix. I've been living with dos and windows since it was the next new thing and I'm glad to see the back side of windows machines. Only thing that still drives me nuts is the disjoint copy and paste meta keys when moving test between windows and parallels/windows - it just hurts my brains and muscle memory.

Comment Re:Can we have this problem, please? (Score 5, Informative) 231

Has happened on a small scale in the US. In central Washington, where the dams on the Columbia River and an abundance of wind power occasionally produces a "perfect storm" of spring snow driven runoff from the Cascade Mountains driving the dams to max production and spring winds producing more renewable power than the region can export with existing transmission lines the result was predictable with zero cost exchange power and conflict over who gets to export their power. The region already has a large pumped storage facility on the Columbia complex, but we still need more storage and transmission capacity.

Comment Re:Hello! It's adjustment to Obamacare! (Score 1) 607

We may have the best doctors in the world, but we have a mediocre healthcare system. Both before and after the start of Obama care. Take a look at the statistics here. Basic measurements of performance are cost and health care outcomes. As to cost we are more than twice the average of other developed nations (OECD) and more than 60% than western European countries. These other countries have a broad range of health care systems including socialized, insurance mandates, private insurance, single payer, tax based and two-tier system. Yet they all perform better than the US for both cost and outcomes.. We have surgery and major test rates double other countries. And over prescription and patent laws drive our pharmacy rates to be double the rest of the western world. If we had great outcomes then I would be happy with the cost, but we have lousy outcomes. We have poor outcomes relative to other western countries as measured by any measure include life expectancy, asthma rates and infant mortality. So both before and after Obama care we have been paying twice as much and getting half the results. Much of this is indeed the system's fault such as the very high number of clerical workers in a US doctor's office to fight with the Byzantine insurance system, the perverse incentive that doctors get paid more for doing too much in a fee for service and the broken way we over pay for patented drugs. One the other hand we as a society have each have some responsibility. How many Americans really make any effort to drop that weight the doctor proscribed they drop? As consumer of health care far too many of us hector our doctors into over prescribing and over aggressive surgery decisions. We must be willing to accept that often the correct prescription is to make changes to our diet and not a prescribe a pill. The effects of the waning smoking epidemic is still working its way through the health care system and it would be interesting to see if the rise in deaths are these folks causing a blip or perhaps it is just the leading edge of the obesity epidemic or even the fallout from over prescribing opiods. I still see a candy jar setting on every admin's desk that gets paid for by the company that is paying for part of the health care cost - how crazy is that? One word of caution with the statistics, they are averages. We have a very uneven societies and this expensive health care is not spread evenly. In the US, the rich over consume health care while the poor put off preventive care until the cost of fixing what would have been a preventable/curable illness become massive. Drug costs for diabetes is a big chunk of health care dollars and most diabetes can be cured with weight loss. Again with an uneven society folks working 50 hours a week flipping burgers and no options for time off for a check-up are set-up to fail. Sure, IT and tech workers spend long hours at work and feel pressure, but few of us would be fired the first time we took an hour off to see a doctor. Yes, as others have said Obama care fixes access, not quality. That quality fix takes no small part of responsibility on our part.

Comment Re:Numerous bits of ignorance. (Score 1) 343

Indeed InMarSat and other providers have been providing much of this "ping home" capability for some time. The airlines have to be willing (or forced) to pay for it and then to not fly without using it. While ping home vastly simplifies the where was the craft it leave the issues open: 1) due to limited bandwidth not all data is sent and 2) what happened after/if the sat link fails. Black boxes can continue to capture reams of data after the sat comm has lost power/fallen off/been turned off by the pilot so they focus on slightly different issues.

Comment Re:Immediately? (Score 1) 166

funwithBSD, There are several separate issues here. The most basic question is how many hours per person is need to achieve a given level of average material comfort. A simple measure is how many hours per person is spent in farming to keep us fed. Since industrialization this has dropped substantially. Same for making a ton of steel, etc. Nothing wrong with that per se. Except it leads to problem two, the distribution of goods and services. Creating an economic system that provides a fair distribution of the wealth and provides reasonable encouragement of individual contribution has been a problem that has defied effective optimal solutions. I would suggest that indeed most of our mass produced goods, cell phones to jeans are capable of being produced in "dark" automated factories at trivial long term cost. The capital investment to do this will drive to even more standardized parts so those jeans may someday only cost $3, but will only come in one style. Sure you will need more robotics and manufacturing engineers, but millions of sweatshop workers will be unemployed in a traditional economy. While we will have the capacity to meet everybody's material needs how will those goods get distributed if most of the world lacks jobs? Do you let people starve and thus starve the capitalist of customers? Do we start shrinking the human population due to lower birth rates as has started in some industrial countries? Do you divert folks from the work force such as sending them for schooling? Does the service economy grow: how many hair cuts can the world use? Do we grow the government sector? (BTW, larger government sector does really help even out the business cycles) Do we just grow the dole queues? Does the dominance of standardized products create a new demand for unique items that drives a massive itsy like market for handmade custom product: will people pay $1000 for a high status artizen custom handmade belt buckle to go with their standard issue $3 jeans? If you could make and sell two or three of those handmade custom belt buckles a week you could have a good living. Is there some Utopian Star Trek solution just waiting to be invented or implemented?

Slashdot Top Deals

Any given program will expand to fill available memory.