Comment Just use AI (Score 1) 98
Maybe they should use their competitorsâ(TM) AI to solve this.
Though, given the attitudes of these AI companies, Iâ(TM)m not even going to bother trying to play the worldâ(TM)s smallest violin.
Maybe they should use their competitorsâ(TM) AI to solve this.
Though, given the attitudes of these AI companies, Iâ(TM)m not even going to bother trying to play the worldâ(TM)s smallest violin.
I think a two party democratic system is terrible and it should be easier to create new parties. The current two should likely be split.
My reasoning is that a democratic system should not be treated as a sports game of two teams. There are plenty of views and we need variety of representation, not to simply fall in line with the two options available or be treated as an outsider.
Then there is the destruction of the social safety net, which compounds the problem.
Many working class people felt abandoned by the Democrats and then voted for the Republicans, believing in the lies being peddled by Trump.
Even worse, things like affordable healthcare and economic support are being further destroyed under Trumpâ(TM)s watch.
Unfortunately neither party seems to care and until a new party can be formed, then itâ(TM)s only âoeindependentsâ who seem to be the champions. Unless those champions can get together to form a party, they are going to have a hard time pushing for the needed changes
You turn off a data center during emergencies and find it was the one responsible for the 911 system, its going to be a bad day.
That's a design and implementation issue. If the data center doesn't have a backup battery or generator and they committed to "five nines" availability, then they are at fault. If they didn't commit to "five nines" availability, but 911 treated at such, then that is a problem on the 911 system.
Emergency systems should be able to operate in a "dumb mode" and in the absence of grid power. If that means throwing more humans to support the situation, then so be it. In the end these systems are meant to be serving humans and not the other way around.
Sounds like a scenario for a low budget film that sets Star Trek in a David Elisson / Trump world. Maybe even find a way to craft that into an episode featuring an authoritarian dystopian world.
Sure it might result in some people getting fired, but there is a good chance theyâ(TM)d not be following the company out of state anyhow?
brakes only $4.99/mo or $50/year!
"*Internet access required, with daily phone home. One time free brake push if outside of network range"
For the 20 or 30 employees there...
Modern factories don't need a lot of people. China and India have them because labor it horribly cheap there. With access to slaves in many places.
Trump's own commerce Secretary admitted that even in the factories come back the jobs won't
Even there they improve automation if it makes sense. Its not always a cost of labour, but managing error rates,
There have been some calls for Intel to reorganise into separate chip development and chip fabrication divisions or businesses.
Note, Intel had previously designed StrongARM and XScale lines, but sold them off.
Is the choice "Golden Gate" a way to appease Trump? Sounds like a combination of grifting and a certain arch...
If the EU switches to open source, it will be the best thing Trump has done. Literally.
Its like software patents. Its not the patents that are good, but the incentive to work around them.
I would so love to be able to make it so Meta stops shoving AI in my face. I don't want it and if they can't pay for the compute resources, then I am not going to help them justify the expense.
Makes me think of Boxee and why I never used it.
Then again you wouldn't have unionised workers if they were being treated fairly in the first place?
And it is for reasons like this we donâ(TM)t want age verification as a core requirement for operating systems.
And US companies sell off their renewable technology IP to China, because they arenâ(TM)t getting the investor or government support in the US. This leads to a furthering of Chinese strength, while US businesses build and lobby for a world that is 20-30 years in the past.
Measure twice, cut once.