Comment Re: Entertainment, huh? (Score 1) 53
It runs MacOS and it's pretty fast, unlike any netbook ever.
Yeah it's got gimped specs but they will be fine for most users, unlike netbooks.
It runs MacOS and it's pretty fast, unlike any netbook ever.
Yeah it's got gimped specs but they will be fine for most users, unlike netbooks.
[learn to internet]
Everyone who cares about this already knows this
You don't actually care
So fuck off
That would defeat the entire purpose of keeping that machine alive.
Right, that's why my karma is maxed and you have to post anonymously because it actually makes your posts more visible.
Bison don't produce as much methane as cows
Yeah, Via made a clone that was similar not-quite-i586 fairly recently too.
I have an old embedded box with one that has SATA 6Gbps ports on it that I thought I would use zeroing out old hard drives.
I tried Puppy, DSL, SystemRescueCD, and a bunch of others and none would finish boot. FreeDOS is fine.
It's either eWaste or I need to dig out an Infomagic CD from the attic to get Redhat 9 pr whatever. Probably need to look up when the jump from 3 to 6 happened in SATA land.
But Linus is correct that actual distros don't supoort it. There's one project for composing embedded images that I might try before it hits a shredder. Or NetBSD maybe.
Half the world runs on VBA for Office applications (or used to, it's probably less now), and VBA for Office has never been officially supported by Microsoft. You're on your own if you choose to use it.
and if it was coming from you I'd still ask the worst possible AI to verify your claims
OK bot. There isn't even a "you".
Due to this news, I suggest we refer to it from here on out as "fauxpilot".
Uranium is not a nuclear weapon. HTH, though I know it won't.
You are welcome to continue development on support for the 486 if you need continued support for it. The kernel is open source and you can easily clone yourself a local repo and continue 486 support maintenance while merging in new features as time goes on.
My very first linux box, which I still have and is still running today, is still on RedHat 3.0.3 that I got on a CD in a book from the Media Play in Poughkeepsie NY in 1996. Granted it is completely useless except as a samba server sharing the 1.6GB hard disk that is still in it (and still works). But, I keep it for posterity, and because I like having a monitor with xearth on it.
I could probably put a newer distribution on it but with only 24MB of RAM, the newer stuff would choke out on it.
well they're not a threat if you keep stopping them from making nukes.
Netanyahu, is that you? Was this lie about nukes they never had promised to you 3,000 years ago?
I see you've run out of intelligent things to say.
I admit that it's not intelligent to continue to waste time talking to someone like you, who thinks you can't do things I've done because you have no practical experience.
I didn't say anything about which user you are or how much permissions you have. The fact that these OSes allow even *root* to make changes to the OS, is insecure in itself. By contrast, Android and iOS strictly limit what installers can do.
HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHA
Even if you do have "god" permissions, an Android or iOS installer can't update the OS itself.
HAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHHA
Keep going, this is precious
MESSAGE ACKNOWLEDGED -- The Pershing II missiles have been launched.