Comment Re:NT 3.5.1 (Score 1) 84
That was the last great windows, for windows values of great. I refuse to go find out, but I bet someone has even figured out how to get it past the 2GB limit and implement USB.
That was the last great windows, for windows values of great. I refuse to go find out, but I bet someone has even figured out how to get it past the 2GB limit and implement USB.
Just to be clear are you suggesting the people who design hardware should be working on coding in Windows,
Seems like it would be an improvement.
Yes. And not every wavelength gets absorbed by cloud cover.
Every wavelength of IR is attenuated by cloud cover to some degree, some more strongly than others. Absorption is also not the only issue.
The Novell Netware model adapted to the VM era is what makes sense, where the tools don't require logging in to the server at all in order to administer the environment.
What? You absolutely had to authenticate to administer a Netware server, unless you did it from the console in the early days. That is logging in. If you don't think so, then neither is passwordless rsh, or ssh with a key and no password.
because they won't give up that terrible UI they've invested so much in
Most of the basic behavior of the UI used in Windows was inherited from IBM CUA, and is also shared by all of the commonest DEs for Linux. They also all have an analogue of the start menu. It's unclear what you're talking about here.
Legacy macOS 10 was never meant as a server OS
Back when the OS MacOS is now based on was created, there was no distinction between workstation and server OSes. Therefore MacOS X not being intended as a server OS is a downgrade from the prior product... like many of the changes Apple made, especially the UI ones.
They chose the under-tested alpha version of an OS from a vendor who is running an attack on the GPL. What could possibly be less surprising than that? You need to recalibrate your surprise-o-meter.
Another disturbing point, why was GitHub being used? Standing up a Git server is easy
Yeah that. Why not a GitGov or GovHub? It makes zero sense.
I was just going to remind IS of their password policy recommendations that everyone doing business with the feds are supposed to follow.
So much for that fucking idea.
I did a stint as an RV repair tech but I really don't want to replace more poop tanks and I can't get a good reference because my ex-boss is a POS.
Maybe it's appliance repair next I guess, that was some of the least terrible RV repair work
Clouds will depend on the frequency.
X-Ray lasers are extremely difficult but they exist. Stepping down from extremely difficult to merely difficult may have some merit.
Whether it's worth the cost will be interesting. Microsats is curious - geostationary would be an easier place to start without the steering complexity.
An interesting project for sure.
Remember when they ported VAX/VMS to PC architecture and put a Windows 3 GUI on top?
That evolved.
"Watch this space."
> pay the Chinese to host our fucking military servers
no, but that's literally what they were doing.
DC doesn't run a serious country.
Counterpoint: Is is plausible that he'd be that successful at insider trading when he has failed at every other endeavor he has turned his hand to?
Depends on your definitions, I suppose. You could argue that engaging in blatant market manipulation and insider trading from the Oval Office for 16 months and only netting $750M in profits represents a failure. Someone more competent could have made a lot more.
Imagine if Nazis had access to modern technology when they were tracking every Jewish person.
We don't have to imagine, we have an apartheid regime including ubiquitous tracking and an ongoing genocide which we can just look at.
1000 pains = 1 Megahertz