The topic was something language related, which I used before as a litmus test for AI.
At some point, Claude calculated that its answers weren't what I was looking for. It then started to, seemingly, insinuate that it had hunches, feelings about where the answer might be, ideas about me having more answers, etcetera.
I was very close to accepting that, wow, Claude is an intelligent being.
Then it dawned on me. So I asked, is it programmed to answer to my questions in a specific way. And indeed, it bluntly stated that its answers aren't answers to my questions but cooked up word salads that are aimed at keeping my interest and engagement.
It's apparently the case that plenty of training data is about academics mulling ideas and trying to keep their discussion partners engaged.
Which then the AI just mimicks, as it's programmed to do. But it comes across as more humble and human, instead of the sycophantic, self assured, idiotic semi savant. An easy thing to fall for.
First, Switzerland has no German, French and Italian parts, it has parts that speak those languages. Well, I sincerely consider Swiss-German a different language from German, easier for German speaking Dutch people to understand than Germans who speak no Dutch, IMHO. Romans don't consider themselves Swiss and not French at all, likewise the Ticinesi consider themselves Swiss instead of Italian.
Second, despite all differences, they still stick together.
Third, the margins here are too slim to write up the definition of Swissness, but as someone who's lived in Switzerland for over 25 years, I assure you that it exists. Punctuality, dependability, humility, honesty, respectfulness, appreciation of quality and the realisation that quality costs, a certain risk aversion
If a student doesn't have the discipline to do their homework, their parent(s) have failed them. It was drilled into me that you have to do your homework before you can go outside a play.
I fully agree with the first part, kids should have the discipline to do their homework - if it's important.
I totally disagree on the necessity of the drilling.
Naturally, for you that was a method that worked for you and that you agree with., so it was clearly right.
Nobody drilled it in me, I mostly decided myself if homework was going to be done. Usually / often I decided it wasn't. At university, studying wasn't harder due to this.
Now with my own kids, I told them I'll love them all the same, even if they don't do well at school. Luckily I've not had to find out. And my kids are very diligent with their homework. It wasn't even (consciously using) reverse psychology, but I'll admit I got terribly lucky with my kids with respect to school.
I am the squarest of square pegs, a misfit in every situation my whole entire life, except when I am blessedly alone.
If you hadn't said anything I'd never have thought anything of the kind. I'm guessing online is the way to go for you. All the best.
... If you cannot control your fucking children then stop having them or at least stop whining
Second, you say what about the parents? Well, what about them? If you think parents can avoid their 15 y.o. from doing much of anything that they're really set on doing, you've no idea of parenting.
Now, the really good thing about such bans in my experience was that our under 16 kids couldn't be asked by others to, for instance, join a WhatsApp chat. Meaning, no teacher could use that as an official channel. Problem solved, we had no other worries then official requirements pushing our kids in that direction.
So it wasn't at all about there being any checking on who does what, just the prevention of having others impose the use of social media.
"If Diet Coke did not exist it would have been neccessary to invent it." -- Karl Lehenbauer