If you always at least check the driver's licence of your taxi or Uber driver, that makes sense. Otherwise, not so much.

Perhaps someone who recently got a secondhand Hyundai may not have been in the system, so such drivers potentially got left behind due to lack of thoroughness on the Hyundai subsidiary. Surely they feel sorry about the omission and will strive to do better next time...

Look, I get that they're having a nice party with booze and brain storming, but I really don't want to search for AI-powered people, much less find them.

On a more serious note, though we're not getting rid of all these AI stories until the bubble bursts, allow me to posit the following regarding AI.

On hallucinations:
AI don't hallucinate from time to time. Every answer they ever give is equally made up. What people call hallucinations are merely cases where the made up answers are ostensibly wrong. Any AI may apologise when it's pointed out that their answer was incorrect, even if in fact, it happened to be correct.

On the hype about AI being oh so capable, and going to put everyone out of a job:
When the first AI company CEO lets their AI handle all their financials, I'll start paying attention to the hype. But not until the AI programmers let their AI handle all their financials will I start believing. Indeed, convince me by putting your money where your mouth is. Until then, i won't pay a lot of attention to these AI stories.

On general AI / artificial general intelligence:
I'll believe someone managed to develop full general AI when the news hits of the first company with zero employees, just shareholders / owners.

Thanks for letting me get that off my chest.

Despite my aversion to mega corporations including Google, I recently rode Waymo in San Francisco and in Los Angeles. I would not have dared to use it with a highway stretch at the first go, but after having made the experience, I can only say I felt really reassured and safe, due to the screen showing what the car sees. And in quite a few cases it spotted pedestrians with dark clothing in the dark that a human would have spotted way later. The driving style is relaxed and unhurried, so not prone to cause issues. The space in the back was a bit cramped, but otherwise the cars (Jaguar) were comfortable.

Also, they are perfectly equipped to spot camels. Just saying.

Unfortunately, you don't specify any budget.

We've got an older Huawei tablet (Media pad M5 10" with 2k5 screen, and with separate pen 2048 pressure levels), not used much anymore, but battery life was awesome, on standby and instantly ready to be used it got about 6+ weeks (indeed it gets little use nowadays, that how I know). Cost about USD 250 I think. Comment from iPad owner (full into Apple ecosystem): "wow, I think your tablet has better audio than mine." He had trouble believing the price.

Then the other tablet gets daily use in the kitchen as internet radio and sometimes YouTube, it's a USD 200 Lenovo (2nd updated hardware version is out, so mine is about 3 to 4 years old). Both of these would fulfill your needs as I interpret them, and there's plenty of others, like Xiaomi Redmi and such.

I have no idea why practically all comments here claim otherwise.

I just read all of your posts in this thread, and perhaps what you want is a $250 15 inch portable screen that you can connect to your phone (or whatever other device)...?

And my post is about pointing out that this is nothing new. Too the benefit of those who weren't paying attention. But I don't get what you're trying to add.

Unrealised potential how? It does what Apple wants it to do. This is the Apple way. Look elsewhere if you don't want to be impacted by this mentality.

Fun fact, the first iPhones actually had an FM radio built in (as part of the WiFi Bluetooth gsm combo if memory serves), but this wasn't considered a desirable feature, so although practically all parts were present (yes, solutions without external antenna existed already, no headset required) the functionality wasn't made available to users.

Microsoft Comic Sans to the rescue!

How is Librewolf better, if it's just based on Firefox? In my eyes that's just unnecessary fragmentation...

I've not run into that problem, but I concur such things should be fixed. I'll never understand how certain problems arise on mobile yet not on the PC version, do they maintain 2 so very different code bases?

Good points. Regarding the ad blocking, it seems many people don't even realise such things are possible... Firefox and on Android Newpipe are indispensable for that reason alone.

I don't know who needs this. But I do know that I've been given a powerful browser on my Linux PCs and on Android.

You can complain all you want about Mozilla and Firefox, and many complaints are surely valid. But Firefox is still the best option, considering the alternative of the full Chrome hegemony.

So if some graphic designers at Mozilla came up with this because they had the urge, fine. It seems to have some appeal. It's not like those graphics designers would have coded something useful in the same time. And true cynics might argue that at least when designing and prepping Kit for release, they're not spending time to horrify the Firefox UI...

Read this posting history.

I work in localization. Technical writing is often easier for machine-translation systems, because the writing is (ideally) deliberately clear, concise, and structured.

The terminology issue you mention can be addressed at least partially by feeding any such machine-translation system a list of words and phrases to keep as-is in the target text.

Fiction, meanwhile, often involves complicated and subtle wordplay, which no AI system is going to handle very well.