Comment Re:A modest proposal (Score 1) 125
Have you checked out tanker rates lately? You absolutely save money by having more domestic supply in this environment.
(Crude isn't exactly "cheap" either)
Have you checked out tanker rates lately? You absolutely save money by having more domestic supply in this environment.
(Crude isn't exactly "cheap" either)
I just tried this for fun with Gemini (hardly the best model, but I wasn't about to spend the money having an agentic framework of high-end models go over it
1) Working with the Iranians at the upcoming UN meeting to try to strike a deal where the US stops its blockage of Iranian oil in exchange for Iran allowing free traffic through Hormuz, without nuclear programme preconditions.
2) Adding pressure on Putin to accept the Ukrainian offer of a mutual energy industry targeting ceasefire
3) Focus freed up US naval forces on protecting convoys through the Bab-el-Mandeb
4) Launching an emergency Jones Act waiver
5) Order the EPA Administrator to issue temporary waivers easing seasonal Reid Vapor Pressure (RVP) gasoline restrictions and granting flexibility on Tier 3 sulfur credit banking.
6) Convene the CEOs of the top domestic refiners into a taskforce run by the Department of Energy to coordinate autumn maintenance schedules to avoid multiple regional coker and hydrocracker units taking turnaround downtime simultaneously.
7) Formally announce that the administration will not conduct large-scale, unrefined crude releases from the SPR. Signal to the industry that physical crude in domestic storage is adequate, shifting regulatory focus to downstream bottlenecks.
8) Reprogram allocated DOE infrastructure funds ($1.4 billion) to expedite cavern repairs at Bryan Mound and Bayou Choctaw.
9) Deploy the Northeast Home Heating Oil Reserve (NEHHOR) strictly on an exchange/loan basis (where refiners borrow diesel barrels now and repay them with interest in refined barrels next spring) to protect national balance sheets while easing spot tightness
10) Issue an Executive Order under the Defense Production Act (DPA) to expedite pipeline compressor stations and pipeline permits connecting the Permian Basin to Gulf Coast refining hubs
11) Direct the Surface Transportation Board to prioritize crude and chemical feedstock movements on Class I railroads.
12) Use USDA Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) authorities to establish emergency fuel cost-offset credits for agricultural producers and commercial freight carriers until crack spreads retreat below $30/barrel.
13) Announce this unified security-and-energy plan publicly to provide appropriate signals to the market.
The US economy as a whole would lose more from banning exports than it would gain. If one is concerned about "ordinary people", it makes more sense to continue allowing exports, add a windfall tax on oil companies or add export duties, and then rebate the revenue from that across the US population, than to ban exports.
Had the oil industry not been so naive and spent this whole year betting on TACO and/or Iranian surrender, the US could be making even more money right now on this crisis. New shale production from an existing lease can be added in just 3-6 months, yet shale expansion rates didn't increase over baseline from spring through the summer. Refining capacity is harder to add that quickly, but probably could have been boosted several percent, which would still be a quite meaningful added value. It gets harder to improve capacity now because most types of capacity addition involve downtime and absolutely nobody wants to be shut down now while crack spreads are this high.
I'd love to see the US congress pass a bill renaming Trump
If Trump thinks AI is so "super intelligent", why doesn't he ask his favorite LLM for a plan to lower gas prices?
He would only ask it for things that result in an improved situation for him, personally. There is nothing at all for him to gain by seeing lower gas prices. He hasn't bought gas himself in many years - and will never have a reason to buy gas again for the rest of his life - so the price is completely irrelevant to him. If the price fell and the MAGA party lost part of congress he would still blame it on other people. If the price stays the same and the MAGA party loses part of congress he'll blame that on other people as well.
The problem with these characterizations is the proof is in the pudding. If it was all no process, ignoring collateral damage, indiscriminate application of munitions without verification there would be a heck of a lot more civilian causalities.
According https://militaryspend.org/iran... there are between 9,044 and 18,371 civilian casualties in Iran due to US air strikes. So yes, preventing collateral damage of civilians is not a priority at Pete Hegseth's "Department of War".
If this were the case where are the receipts? Trump TACOs out of most everything. After softening up the regimes forces and power projection capability Trump has been mostly focused on making stupid pointless deals and the far more fruitful campaign of economic dissolution of the regime and its terror proxies. Seems to be directly at odds with your violence premise.
My violence premise is based on the fact that Trump has ordered military strikes on seven different countries during his second term so far. https://factually.co/fact-chec...
Personal shoppers etc are a thing; but what is different here is the scale.
If Amazon's experience is so bad, that is what that is maybe the market will move to walmart.com; not really the point.
The point is that letting the AI Boys become an intermediary between every enterprise and most people will NOT be a good thing. I am not saying Amazon isnt a bad actor or isnt hypocritical here on a broader context. I am saying that shop keeps of all stripes should be at least free to post a "No Robots Allowed Sign" and have it respected.
Because I don't think we will much care for the outcomes when we have a world where Coca Cola and slip Meta half a a couple hundred million to make sure the next model generally chooses their products when someone asks the AI to ensure the fridge has colas in it. The consequences for the market where there are six or so middle men everywhere won't remain 'free' long.
....Keeping war with Iran eternally on the table is beloved by all warhawks, of which there's an ample supply on "both sides" of the aisle — while on some topics there are two sides in Congress, funding the MIC is not one of them.
Every authoritarian regime needs some form of multi-generational conflict to justify their power over the people. Trumpism is a form of anti-democratic, authoritarian-oligarchy that exists only within the context of an eternal conflict. The conflicts only exist to distract the people from Trump and his oligarch's corruption, abuse of power, and outright theft from the American people.
If you teach your children to like computers and to know how to gamble then they'll always be interested in something and won't come to no real harm.