It's a good question, but I think framing it as what humans need to do to be able to live alongside ASI is the wrong way to look at it. The right way to look at it is "What do humans need to learn how to do to have fulfilling lives?".

Of course that question also depends on what makes sense for humans in a world run by benevolent ASI. We don't need to bother thinking about humans' role in a world run by malevolent or even disinterested ASI because there will be no role.

Sort of. When my kids were in public school in the 2000s and 2010s, book encyclopedias were sometimes grudgingly accepted as source. Not always, and it was often made clear that they weren't proper sources (because they're not!). The solution was to use Wikipedia but to follow the reference links to the primary sources it cites and use those.

I thought that wasn't just a good answer, but a strict improvement over accepting hardcover encyclopedias, both pedagogically and as a matter of scholarly principle.

Wouldn't that be for the office of the President, not Trump personally? And since it just upheld existing precedent...

What? Defend that extraordinary claim, it appears plainly false.

But that *does* require that you believe that they are honest to you about their future actions...and that they won't change their mind later.

Pirates were often hanged by the same countries that issued them letters of marque.

Why do you believe what they say when they continually misrepresent things. I'd say "lie", but that implies they know what they're doing.

By that logic, we should stop prosecuting burglary and instead punish its victims for not spending enough on locks.

I love how everyone here seems to assume they know what is in the order without ever having looked at it.

The US was never a party to the ICC and rejecting its warrants is based on a policy that goes much further back. Hell, one of the declared reasons we broke away from the UK was our citizens being tried overseas.

Where did you find that in the order?

What is China, who is already doing this to us, going to complain about? Who will care if Russia complains?

Why's that scary?

Why do you assume nobody else thought of those things?

You should read the order.

The people behind Cambridge Analytica didn't go away. They just let one company fold and moved on. How many other entities are involved in the same manipulation via social media?

I suspect that the same people who are bankrolling Nigel Farage and others created the social media storm that caused the mass storming of Ceuta.

The US was not a signatory. Letters of Marque are still legal under the Constitution, but Congress grants them. This is under the President's national security authority.

Issuing formal Letters of Marque for this exact purpose has been floated.