Well, the AP is relevant here since that's what we were talking about authenticating. Or rather, how they aren't authenticated so it is possible to connect to a rogue. And no, I agree, certs don't help there. WPA Enterprise is not appropriate for guest/hotspot wifi. I was pointing out some reasons why. Like the last thing you said, that's a good one too.

No, I don't like to do that. You can just tell me what's in it and include the link for verification. I very rarely want to go watch a video about something I could read instead.

Is it a video of the Kochs saying they like Trump now?

Really?! Well, that's interesting...

Any fights? I'm finding that I'm amused by the idea of a disagreement between a pilot and a controller descending into fisticuffs. Plus, I had an excuse to say, "descending into fisticuffs".

Thank you, but no, it is exactly where I intended.

Well... architecturally that's exactly true! Craftsman was followed by Deco followed by Modern.

Are the roofs stupider than what new houses have? Everything has to have a crazy high ceiling, so the roofs are all over the place. Must be a real pain to fix. I'm fortunate in that regard, my 1988 house has a pretty simple roof. We had to replace it after a storm blew off a bunch of shingles, and my wife insisted we spend extra (over what insurance paid) for a metal roof. It was a good idea. I recommend it. Don't tell her I said that though, I complained like crazy about the extra expense.

It's a good question, but I think framing it as what humans need to do to be able to live alongside ASI is the wrong way to look at it. The right way to look at it is "What do humans need to learn how to do to have fulfilling lives?".

Of course that question also depends on what makes sense for humans in a world run by benevolent ASI. We don't need to bother thinking about humans' role in a world run by malevolent or even disinterested ASI because there will be no role.

Sort of. When my kids were in public school in the 2000s and 2010s, book encyclopedias were sometimes grudgingly accepted as source. Not always, and it was often made clear that they weren't proper sources (because they're not!). The solution was to use Wikipedia but to follow the reference links to the primary sources it cites and use those.

I thought that wasn't just a good answer, but a strict improvement over accepting hardcover encyclopedias, both pedagogically and as a matter of scholarly principle.

Wouldn't that be for the office of the President, not Trump personally? And since it just upheld existing precedent...

What? Defend that extraordinary claim, it appears plainly false.

But that *does* require that you believe that they are honest to you about their future actions...and that they won't change their mind later.

Pirates were often hanged by the same countries that issued them letters of marque.

Why do you believe what they say when they continually misrepresent things. I'd say "lie", but that implies they know what they're doing.

By that logic, we should stop prosecuting burglary and instead punish its victims for not spending enough on locks.

I love how everyone here seems to assume they know what is in the order without ever having looked at it.

The US was never a party to the ICC and rejecting its warrants is based on a policy that goes much further back. Hell, one of the declared reasons we broke away from the UK was our citizens being tried overseas.

Where did you find that in the order?