Given the reference list, I suspect not ChatGPT, but rather https://magisterium.com/

I guess we can add a whole new category to the Darwin Awards.

I'm fine. I plan to switch to self-employment and provide artisinal technical support, perhaps via OnlyFans.

Sure, maybe I'll have to prominently display my bare feet or hawk used headsets to my clients, but it's a small inconvenience.

Damnit. WFH.

I knew what I meant!

I provide IT support to insurance brokerages - you may or not be surprised to find that since COVID, they're continuing to convert to WFO.

Especially for the boutique shops, I doubt an RTO office can compete financially with one structured under a WFH model.

For most roles in the process, WFH should be very desirable to an employer, so long as the employee signs an appropriate contract indicating that they're obligated to come to the office should their home setup be inadequate for supporting WFH, including mandatory local installations of whatever communications and collaboration tool you decide to employ.

Maybe you require them to attend a certain number of in-person meetings or team building exercises (but not 3/week, I'm talking monthly or less).

It saves on office space and related expenses. Throw up a suitable server farm and have employees remote in - all the horsepower, storage, and data security of a data center, it's potentially more secure than a cubicle farm.

Forcing RTO is just a way to fire people without having to admit you replaced them with a lower quality but much less expensive AI.

Company scrip. You'll swear fealty to a Tech Bro, and in return you'll get scrip you can spend on whatever their empire produces. They will control what is available and how much of it you can have.

They want to be gods on Earth.

Eventually, they're going to realize they don't need 8 billion people consuming energy and resources when they can sustain their lifestyle with a few thousand people and a few billion robots, and then things get very sad for a while.

We are in an economic system based on ownership, with an ever-shrinking group of people owning an ever-growing percentage of things and making everyone else rent from them.

As labor is replaced by AI and robots, more and more people will exist who are not needed in this economic model, and while there's no need for a few people to own everything... they're not going to give it up.

UBI is a stop-gap. It still leaves a small hereditary capital class in control, because they will be the ones in charge of who gets UBI and how much. Because it will not be 'universal' in distribution.

We can't dial back human labor, because we're heading for a time when so little human labor is required that an individual share wouldn't be practical.

We're still going to have scarcity - you're going to want a place to live, you're going to need energy to power things, you're going to need a share of resources to have those things produced for you. There is no 'post-scarcity' on these fronts.

I look to the south, and if a bit of Canadian cultural propaganda is required to counter the stuff that's been coming out of Hollywood for the last century... OK.

We value education more, guns less. We value cooperation more, greed less. We're OK with single-payer healthcare instead of letting the rich at the top get richer bleeding us to death, and you're not going to convince us that's wrong because somebody else is getting healthcare 'for free'.

There's a reason so many Americans have recently discovered their Canadian roots and want our passport, and it's not because things are going well in the US.

> No different than AI/LLM.

One involves sentient minds, the other doesn't. Come back with that argument when it's reasonable to believe an AI could actually be self-aware.

It's problematic. In terms of prompting your own process, your final work is no less genuine, but it's the lit version of the legal "fruit of the poisonous tree".

That AI is not only replacing human art, devaluing it, it's doing so based on theft of work humans trying to make a living already created.

If you're a writer caught using AI, you're betraying your peers.

I know everybody turns off any new features immediately upon release, but with the new(ish) agent the way some of the various bits and pieces have come together has been pretty great.

Credits are global now, so youre watching something "why does he look familiar?", you click down to the actor now it shows you their whole filmography, you can watchlist stuff right there, and even a little category 'Youve seen them in' with anything with them in any of your libraries youve watched by recent. Not just other shows if youre watching a show or only other movies if youre watching movies. And since you can just search and browse through anything/anyone now, its actually replaced IMDB for me just because its sooo much cleaner. https://watch.plex.tv/person/n... vs https://www.imdb.com/name/nm00...

And speaking of the watchlist, thats universal now, you can search and add stuff you dont have, from any service, even stuff thats not on any service, and the watchlist can interface directly with the *arrs, so youre looking up that guy from that thing, watchlist another of his movies, radarr goes and does its thing. You can add upcoming stuff too and they even have trailers now, so i dont have to go to Youtube anymore cuz it doesnt make me wade through 20 fake AI trailers before finding the one on the actual studios channel and then it doesnt autoplay some assholes reaction or breakdown of the trailer i just watched right after.

AND if your users have their watchlists public, you can monitor theirs too, so friends and family can just watchlist stuff you dont have without leaving the plex app, so you dont need to try to convince them to use a third party app like Omni to request stuff.

All the other social features still suck tho, their own lack of features makes you abuse the rating system as a filter for other things instead of as a rating system, but replacing IMDB and youtube for at least my purposes has been pretty nice. Some of my users dont have their watchlists public either so i still have a facebook group chat for requests cuz who wants to use some third party app for requests. .

$750 is ridiculous tho, i paid $100 during a 50% off sale a couple of black fridays ago, but with all my collections and playlists and everything and especially all my users switching to Jellyfin wouldnt be as simple as everyone pretends, but if in the future they roll out Plex2 to loophole my lifetime or try to charge my users individually ill figure it out.

Instead, sell a lifetime license to a particular major version with a specified support period. If I want to run an old version that's been compromised... that's my problem. If I am happy with not having the latest codecs and plug-ins... that's my problem.

And if I'm not happy, I can buy a new license for the latest major version to fix that.

I think of it like this: life is dangerous. You can surrender freedom for safety, but there's a balance point beyond which you're losing more than you gain.

I don't want to live in a world where I'm watched everywhere I go and there's a constant risk that someone will access data on me to cause me some kind of harm. And the risk will always be there with an omnipresent surveillance state.

I'm OK if the cops have to work harder to catch criminals and a few more people are hurt by criminals if it means we all get to be freer - and a certain minimum level of safety is achieved. Freedom costs, you must be willing to risk something to maintain it.

I will refer you all to the movie Real Genius.