It's designed for the wrong atmosphere, wrong g, wrong instrumentation, probably the wrong nav system.

Oh, and it is the reference model for some currently deployed devices that can't be physically accessed for diagnostics.

It has the nice attribute of already existing, I'll give it that.

I will be happy to be wrong, but domestically I do not see meaningful change happening in the US without violence. The religious right is not going to let go of power peacefully.

Internationally, you can't really sanction the US - it's just too big and interconnected with the majority of the world. It's also true that the current management and culture is unsustainable and if it doesn't change course nobody will have to sanction it because it's going to collapse economically.

But a computer I can't load my own code on is no longer a general purpose computer - it's a walled-garden appliance and I'm not going to buy it.

I'm OK with stupid when it is self-defeating and self-harming.

I'm not OK with stupid when it tries to force the rest of us to come along for the ride.

> If a company (imagine a developer-owner, one-man show) stops hosting the only live server for a game because he's taking care of an ill spouse, why should he be obligated to make significant software modifications, host those patches, or create documentation instructing how to create and host a the game via a private server. And if he doesn't do so, then he has to refund everyone at the HIGHEST PRICE for which the game has sold in the last 12 months?

Like it's not child's play to include the capability from the beginning? Or to carry business insurance against the liability?

Release the server code and documentation (which you should always have and always have up-to-date), and a client patch allowing arbitrary server addresses (which you should have planned on and therefore it should be a simple patch).

Then it's up to the public to figure it out.

Yeah, climate change is a bitch when it happens on human timescales. "You shouldn't live where it's too hot" isn't really that fair to say when the place starts changing during your own lifetime.

People really shouldn't live in places where they die if modern technology gives out for a day or two.

In a cold climate you can revert to burning things, but if it's too hot and the power goes out, it's a much bigger issue. Worse if there is too much demand on local water sources or importing food from far away because it can't grow in the local climate.

My solution is manually forcing checkpoints. I ask for a specific correction, then a full code dump. I keep an updated copy of the basic prompt plus the latest code and dump it into a fresh session to lose all the baggage.

It's clunky, but I get better results than trying to reason with a mindless AI.

>Video games from the 1980s.

Probably not all of them, but it is surprising how many ROM images exist out there and how available emulators are to run them on modern computers, if you look hard enough.

I've seen every game I ever played on my C=64, and I've seen a lot more for every console I've ever heard of except ColicoVision. I assume those exist as well, somewhere.

>For example, it forgets parts of the code after awhile and has to be reminded to reuse a function instead of rewriting it.

This is something that has frustrated me when playing with AI - nothing is fixed. The nature of the beast is vagueness, and I want to be able to lock things down or exclude them.

The longer the session, the more likely the AI will screw up something you were already happy with. They have no sense of time, so trying to block something means nothing as the AI still includes things from before the block request.

For serious use, the ability to correct and have the corrections stick seems very basic to me. I consider it so fundamental it should never have needed to be mentioned.

"It's an agent that prompts Claude,"

It's AI all the way down

Notion is really only valuable as a memory/brain for Claude these days. It actually excels at that when used properly. I was also annoyed by their gmail/calendar inetgration though. It really wanted to take over the inbox and tag things how it wanted. I just didn't understand the point of it.

Frankly, the quality of build, the stability of the operating system, and just the plain reliability and features even in the supporting tools exceed Windows. Take the Preview App. The work I can do on PDFs; signatures, annotations, OCR, right out of the box, and built so that the versions on my iPhone and iPad fully integrate, cannot be easily replicated on Windows. Apple just really has an eye for workflow, and making sure the base system and tools fit well into that.

It's not perfect, to be sure, I wouldn't want to use Pages as my full time word processor, and Apple, like Microsoft and Google, suffer designed interoperation friction, which does suck. But all in all, I'm just more efficient on a Mac, and in subtle ways I never knew were even problems until I picked a MacBook up the first time. Honestly going to Windows right now is just horrible for me, particular Windows 11, which just feels like constant chaos and out of control busy-ness.

Micron started a new fab at their HQ in 2024 and it's barely halfway built. They have another one going up somewhere on the east coast also. They take years to build and many billions of dollars. They don't go up over night.

I worked at Micron for almost 9 years and have seen the fabs being built. Its not small feat.

I see you registered here 3 minutes before me. I remember when this place was hosted in Robs dorm room.