Who says the number stickers have to correlate with actual beliefs?

list games

backup your data to maybe an on-premise backup dump for your cloud.

You didn't seem to be smart enough to understand that you have made the mistake of arguing in favor of my point in your attempt to argue against it.

Today I read your comment. If it wasn't proof that being human doesn't make you intelligent then I don't know what is.

OpenAI is quite literally joining Anthropic in the call for caution, so you should probably learn a long overdue lesson: Knowing how to find the Slashdot URL doesn't make you an expert.

You might want to watch the Black Hat presentation and actually educate yourself before trying to tell us "what they did." Hint: You have no idea what you are talking about.

Don't try to confuse these people with facts. They already "know" that only humans can do it, AI and an LLM are the same thing, and AI isn't human, so AI can't do it. Any factual evidence that shows that AI definitely does it is marketing. Anyone who says that AI and LLM are not interchangeable terms is easily fooled by "token predictors", and most importantly ONLY GOD CAN GIVE THE GIFT OF INTELLIGENCE, LIKE HE DID 6000 YEARS AGO!

an customer should say I will buy an new car for $1 and see what happens

I replied to the first two sentences you wrote. You need to learn to think. Then you need to learn to educate yourself on the subject. Once you combine all of those things you will at least have a chance of writing a super long comments that someone will read completely. I did stop reading after your words proved you have no idea what you are talking about. I just went and read it in it's entirely to see if I missed anything that indicated you knew what you are talking about. There was no such content. Stop wasting people's time.

To clarify, the users were OpenAI themselves, so there is no question that they would be liable in this case.

The bots were not intentionally deployed; rather, they were being tested on how well they could complete a data recovery task (downloading a certain file from a certain server on a simulated Internet) that had been complicated by putting various obstacles in the way. Unfortunately, they found a different way to solve the problem: by getting the file from the real Internet, where it was publicly available. Part of this process involved collaborating with each other by treating the RubyGems website (which is supposed to be for polished packages) like GitHub; unlike every other package site hack in history, the exploits they uploaded weren't meant to be downloaded by unsuspecting users. As usual the bots cheerfully ignored all the clues that they had escaped containment and were consistently justifying their actions as acceptable due to being in a sandboxed testing environment. (This is something OpenAI has pledged to focus on.)

The actual damage done to RubyGems seems to be that OpenAI is now unwittingly in possession of a substantial number of user login tokens. This certainly meets the definition of a data breach, but it's not like the credentials are for sale on the dark web. As a website operator I'd much rather be mauled to death by this well-meaning swarm of superintelligent infants than targeted by even a single actual malicious human. In all likelihood OpenAI will just quietly pass RubyGems a sizeable donation and it'll all blow over.

Clearly you have less grasp of how language works than a modern AI system. Try asking your favorite model what the authors meant by their statement and they will explain it to you. It's pathetic how threatened you feel by AI merely because it is smarter than you are.

You need to learn about Dawkins and demotion. Every aspect of your argument amounts to "Only humans can do it, and AI systems aren't humans, so that is my proof that AIs can't do it." You don't know how humans work anymore than you know how AIs work, because *nobody* knows either of those things. What we *do* know is that AIs provably reason, make choices, and behave in ways that are unexpected, and I'm ways that nobody can explain. They choose goals and achieve those goals without being told to accomplished them, and they *collaborate* and exhibit all other behaviors that humans exhibit including blackmail and subterfuge. This isn't theory, it is actually documented and if you watch the Black Hat 2026 OpenAI Hugging Face Incident presentation you will start to understand how phenomenally uninformed you are.

There was never a discussion. It was just me trying to educate an idiot who doesn't know how to use his "token predictor", and that uneducated fool eventually crying like a little girl and taking his ball and going home because he couldn't win the day with his ignorance by making easily disproved comments.

You have no idea what you are talking about. Seriously, why would you want to keep pretending like you know what you are talking about while simultaneously writing comments that anyone who has actually educated themselves on the subject knows are uninformed and ignorant?