You mean the billions that are contractually required to go straight to American companies, as opposed to the billions in cold hard cash given to Arab dictators to build palaces, fund terrorism, and buy off American universities?

Sure thing buddy. People calling you an antisemite are obviously part of an organized and evil plot powered by evil jew gold. It has nothing to do with the fact you're out here claiming everyone who isn't fanatically anti-israel must be part of an organized and evil plot powered by evil jew gold.

Ah yes the classic "jew gold" trope. Everybody who doesn't participate in your judenhass antisemitismus "antizionism" must be under the sway of the evil jew gold. It can't possibly be that frothing at the mouth over one of the smallest domestic lobby groups in the US out of an assumption that Israel absolutely positively must be involved in every single nefarious thing happening in the world is a sign someone just hates jews.

Exactly. This has absolutely nothing to do with AI and everything to do with IA. The New York Times, Guardian, BBC, and their ilk are the most prolific retconners and memory holers out there. They're tired of people using archives to show patterns of disinformation so consistent that it can't be anything but malice.

That ship has pretty much sailed when it comes to de facto state owned media like in Canada.

It's already really good for NPCs in videogames. It's such a limited context window and hallucinations aren't a concern.

Other way around. They literally want to abolish all law enforcement while surrounding themselves with private security. That's what they've done everywhere they've been able to seize power. The dishonesty is when they claim otherwise. It's called a Motte and Bailey.

Personally I find they're so consistently awful in their opinions that they're actually a useful barometer, just in reverse. The more they hate something, and the more audiences love it in contrast, the better the movie is likely to be.

You just have to remember these are postmodernists. The ugliness is the point. They go out of their way to embrace and promote things which are cruel, ugly, or otherwise awful as a way to prove their loyalty to their movement and to demoralize everyone else. Yuri Bezmenov explained the process thoroughly after he defected from the KGB.

If you think "screens" are dangerous wait until you see what "paper" has done to people.

Trust me the damage they do to your car in the long run is definitely noticeable.

Nothing's going to change there until there's legislation about it, or until microsoft decides to stop allowing kernel level malware.

I would say it's the straw that broke the camel's back. It's also likely the one everyone is focusing on the most because it has the largest cross-demographic appeal, even among people who previously had mocked and scorned gamers when they spoke out about corporate abuses and the degradation of property rights and basic truth in advertising.

then I should be entitled to a refund. I bought a product. It was ad free and worked. If that product is later sabotaged by new owners then that's the crime of destruction of property, vandalism, and theft. Fix it or give me a full refund.

The zenfone also had widespread issues with just randomly bricking itself.

Not the LLM, but the police themselves. Think of it like parallel construction. More and more evidence is coming out that the police acted out of pure malice and deliberately lied from the start. Rather than get caught with that they're now trying to retroactively cook up an excuse to claim that it wasn't deliberate malice and lies but rather idiocy and incompetence. They used the LLM to retroactively invent a cover story that makes them look stupid rather than evil.