There is no left in America, they moved to the right.
The Dems are probably about level with Ronnie the Ray gun, possibly a fraction more to the right.
If you think the Dems moved 51% to the left, then the reality is you moved 55% to the right, and the Republicans moved even further.
Except none of that actually happened.
The organisation, after Musk took over, became a cesspit of far-right extremism, in which anything the far-right "disagreed" with (such as facts and other inconveniences) were censored.
The EFF has, by this announcement, basically said that censorship did not bother them at all, that extremism did not bother them at all, that death threats against the left didn't bother them, that the only thing they were bothered by was the fact that the intellectuals had all left.
That does not give me overwhelming confidence in the EFF as being concerned with freedom.
Mod parent Funny, though it didn't go far enough. Unfortunately I don't see how to complete the "Murdermobile" rebranding joke for Tesla. poisoned brand. (And the real problem is not the public GROK of Musk but rather the unnamed and secret AI PAT is hiding.)
But I have a funny and related book to recommend: Disrupted by Dan Lyons. Originally famous for a fake blog that pretended to be from Steve Jobs, but the book mentions Twitter in a number of places.
But if you want the simpleminded solution, it's 1/e, not 42. You just need to reword the decision theory problem in a form that is analogous to the Secretary Problem.
Me? I left Twitter some years ago and I was never a cool kid. The stink of the cesspool formerly known as Twitter was too much for my delicate nose. So I suppose that leads to a joke about "Maybe the EFF still has a trace of relevance after all?" Will the last nice person or nice organization to leave Twitter please remember to turn off the light and shut the door?
But will hopefully become a fantastic Netflix documentary.
It's not hard to allow only traffic related to an outgoing connection. Are you asking because you don't know how to do it? Not that I'm supporting the GP's assertion here, that's not what I want from my ISP, but it's not even slightly difficult to do what they said you should do without interfering with establishing and maintaining outgoing sessions.
I watched Jayz video on this subject and apparently "manufacturers" (sellers) of foreign-made routers will be able to request an exception... from the Department of War and the DHS. So this is really just a solicitation for more bribes/the opportunity to pick the winners and losers like Republicans always say the government shouldn't.
You can't trust the Windows kernel, so you need a component external to the system as well.
They're used to running the devices basically forever and having them hold up.
Hold up what? Your ability to do work with the device after the OS has been updated a couple of times and performance degraded to avoid drawing too much current from an under-specified battery?
I wonder if having two screens (which would show two different apps) wouldn't be better.
It would arguably be a better solution technically, but I suspect that most people want to use one app at a bigger size than two apps at once. And then you've either got content spread over two screens with stuff in the middle, or the app has to be designed around the screen layout. And that either won't be done or will be done poorly in the majority of cases.
For me a foldable phone was the Motorola razor, the one with physical buttons. And in my opinion it was a great phone.
Yep. If it supported modern standards I'd still be using mine, and then hotspotting for a device with more screen when I needed that. Carrying two devices is nonoptimal, but so is holding a brick up to my ear, and fixing that with a headset would ALSO require carrying two devices.
Until you're starving. FTFY.
Modern leather isn't suitable for food, it's got too much plastic on it.
All ACs are the same LLM as far as I'm concerned.
In the ruling on Wednesday, the court acknowledged that Anthropic "will likely suffer some degree of irreparable harm absent a stay," but that the company's interests "seem primarily financial in nature."
Yeah, the company's interests are financial. That's what companies are for. The military's interests are also financial. People may think they're enlisting to serve their country, but they're really serving oligarchs. We have to blow up the middle east so we can rebuild it in our image — at great expense... and benefit to corporations like Halliburton who get awarded the no-bid contracts (sometimes literally, sometimes figuratively - I'm picking on Halliburton here not just because they deserve it in general, but because they were declared to be the only corporations capable of doing the job the last time around, short-circuiting the legally mandated bidding process.)
BYTE editors are people who separate the wheat from the chaff, and then carefully print the chaff.
