Some place between sometimes and often - I'm not here to argue that - researchers are the first to discover.

But it's also almost meaningless to just go, "I'm such an amazing realist, the worst case happens every time."

That's not really being realist. That's just you not knowing actual things, and having an emotion.

What makes this more than lazy clickbait?
If this guy spontaneously dropped dead why would anyone who matters care?

You'll have excess support they built and by dying soon will cease to need.

What do you imagine was somehow "taken" and is somehow lost? The fewer people the better quality of life. The sooner the US population starts shrinking the more assets to go around. Growth is bad. It only happened because humans were too stupid not to breed like rats.

Society is quite efficient at redistributing assets of the dead. How do you imagine your predecessors got land and homes? Death solves far more problems than it creates. Plan wisely and profit therefrom. Choose to be versatile and capable. Blaming externalities is a waste of thought.

The situation is certainly no reason to seek population growth which is purely bad for all but rich real estate developers.

Population decline is pure win.

Please tell me eadon.com is yours

Why enrich a genocidal enemy society we and our remaining allies spend trillions to contain? That's slow, inexorable economic suicide.

Communist China abandoned communism but not oppression and ultranationalism. Uighers being Muslim even those who hate US strategic mistakes in the Middle Eastdon't complain about Chinese genocide when the target minority lacks appeal.

Amusing that those yowling about other US strategic mistakes are silent when an enemy society sells us shiny objects so the Epstein class can finish destroying the US economy. There is no rational obligation to social suicide over mere economic ideals. Ideals have no place in business because business is war.

One thing I must admire about Bejing, if you sufficiently undermine their society they unapologetically kill you, a practice the US should adopt with its own social saboteurs instead of worshipping kleptocracy.

The better the tracking data, the more targeted the impression, the higher the clickthru rate. Crafting tracking consent dialogs in a way that favors one app or the other is going to increase the efficiency of campaign placements that target users of that app, rather than campaigns run by app developers who experience a lower percent of users consenting to track.

And they're welcome, as a business to swallow those aquisition expenditures, or fund their own Canadian content, or not do business here.

The list of developed countries that don't have domestic cultural protection policies is low. The US doesn't have one because of its size (or I'll throw you a bone - HOW AWESOME THEY ARE) - it simply doesn't need one.

Kind of hilarious in light of how pro-protectionist things have swung there. If the US audience started consuming predominantly anime TV, movies, books, etc overnight (purely just because of how good they are, right?) you'd bet your ass US would do the exact same thing.

What you don't get is that French is useful for many people - it just wasn't useful for you - and you project that because to you, personal experience is reality. Calling Mandarin, Spanish, Hindi, and Arabic more useful languages for living, identifying with other citizens, and employment in Canada is fucking bananas - and I'm married to a Taiwanese woman and speak some Mandarin!! Nothing you've said has changed my mind. Your points are noted, but still remarkably dumb.

so why aren't they given force adoption

I feel like we need a "take Murdoch5 to a real job" day or something. I'd literally pay to sit you down some time and explain how the real world works.