Comment Re:How could this work? (Score 1) 26
The Turing test (which involves having a 1 to 1 conversation with an AI agent) has fuck all to do with astroturf posts, dummy.
The Turing test (which involves having a 1 to 1 conversation with an AI agent) has fuck all to do with astroturf posts, dummy.
Not by a long shot. Unsafe is scoped. 20% of Rust packages may use unsafe, but the amount of code in unsafe sections is far far far lower. Unsafe means "I accept the risk of doing unsafe things" but because it's scoped, just because a package uses Unsafe, it's still benefiting from the memory safety of bounds checking and borrow checking 99% of the time.
That's a far far cry from "it's just the same thing as doing it in C"
Usually with our money... Right and Left = Divide and conquer. No option options. I stopped trusting any of them decades ago.
That's the entire goal of flooding the zone with shit. Trusting nobody is not the smart position I suspect you consider it to be.
"And the presentation looks suspiciously like yet another WM."
Of course. Never forget the true reason many new users adopt Linux is desktop "ricing". Utilitarian considerations only matter to the tiny minority of utilitarian users.
Most computers are entertainment machines (which is fine) and that consumer demographic (like those who automatically like social media posts with cat pictures) are easy to please.
Linux adoption greatly benefits from the limited appearance options offered by Windows. If MSFT want quicker uptake of new Windows versions it would be wise to invest in easy appearance customization.
Understanding users as they are is key to giving them what they want. That need not be honestly explained because admitting love for trifles is uncomfortable for some.
ya basic, son
They could say no. No-one is stopping them.
You're right. Also a professional baseball player *could* put their bats down and just stand at the plate, but pointing out that it's physically possible is stupid, especially if your argument supporting that "They Can Just Do That" is that baseball players *should put their bats down*.
This is why such people shouldn't be in positions of power.
Again with the should. It's dumb saying "they can do something, but they won't, but they should" because it's a moot point. Yes, they could also write a press release that is an 80 page Star Trek fanfic set in the narrative universe of Mr Rogers. Nothing is stopping them. But what is the value of pointing out something they are physically capable of when even you seem to understand why they won't? It's just a completely meaningless observation, particularly since you couch it in phrasing that suggests it's just a simple easy thing to do? You're trying to have your argument both ways - it makes you sound simple.
Stability is relative. Compared to reinstalling Win9X so often I only recently forgot my most-used 98SE product key, Win2K was a breath of fresh air, especially for dual CPU rigs formerly afflicted with NT 4.0.
There may be a silver lining.
Desperation will ensure sales to the only customers (PC building enthusiasts) who will still care about traditional removable RAM.
Normals never install an OS, never open their computers, and never install internal hardware upgrades. People who do are "techno-divergent".
Apple demonstrates soldered RAM and storage are no barriers to consumer sales with zero need for a hobbyist market.
Ancient Slashdotters remember COAST (Cache On A STick) and why it went away.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Today we have ROAST (RAM On A STick) which only exists for customers who cannot afford to max out RAM on computer purchase, there being no (conventional user to whom computers are magic) downside to max RAM.
Being able to buy a PC with a cheap spinning rust hard drive and the least offered amount of RAM then binning those and maxing out with aftermarket parts (mostly Crucial RAM in my and many others case) was great while it lasted but the vast majority of PCs go from womb to tomb without upgrades and will in future.
How often I found where I should be going only by setting out for somewhere else. -- R. Buckminster Fuller