The failure you describe was ST everywhere. What is generally being proposed is DST everywhere. And I see no problem with dawn being at 8am. It is well before most people have to go to work which usually starts at 9.

A reasonable solution is to change to Standard Time everywhere, but also allow regions to decide what time zone they are in. If they prefer Daylight Savings Time all the time, they switch one time zone to the East. Maybe make some rules that the resulting time zones must be contiguous.

I suspect the vast majority of them will switch, so it may be useful to rename the timezones so the words Pacific, Mountain, Central, Eastern still correspond mostly to the area they were before.

It's really unclear why Trump does not do this. It would be immensely popular and would fit with his other actions.

I think it is possible that it is because he said at one point that he would "get rid of Daylight Savings Time". When in fact he almost certainly wanted to "have Daylight Savings Time all the time". He does not want to be told he said the wrong thing. However I think this could instead be done as "move the time zones" so everybody is on Standard Time but they are in a different time zone than before. Rename the time zones so the name of the zone you are in does not change, this appears to be what BC did.

I'm pretty certain that if in the 60's they did not require it to be a secret and that a fighter jet could be used, Castro would have been quickly assassinated. Also quite a few heads of state have been killed by individuals or terrorists who are not directly following government orders, JFK is not that unusual.

I believe if the electoral college votes were allocated to match the popular vote in each state it would be fine. Sure somebody in Wyoming has 4x the voting power as somebody in Texas, but this may not matter much, particularly because the population of Wyoming is not that high. There is no election in history where such allocation of electoral votes produces a different result than the popular vote.

Weighing everybody's vote by multiplying it by their state's electoral college size and dividing by the number of votes in that state would also work. This would allow RCV and approval and other multiple-choice voting systems to work.

It can be called "The War Department", which has historical precedent and you won't sound like a moron.

Unfortunately the aliens refused to rename themselves "Trump". He tried "Aliens of America" too.

You are basically saying "there is no such thing as a Nazi or a Communist". That is false.

YOU follow your link, find the list of primary sources, select it, type Ctrl+C, then go back here, make a response and type Ctrl+V.

No I am not going to search for whatever you think is the primary source.

If you read the article, actually it is 'software that turns off charging when below 41 degrees and cold that don't mix well'. But don't let facts interfere with your rant.

I think it will be pretty hard to charge an EV in a location "where there's no electricity to run a block heater". So an electric block heater will work if the purpose is to make charging work.

That is for warming the cabin when the vehicle is on the road.
If it is charging, there is an electric cord right there that can much more cheaply provide the energy to heat it.

Obviously if they put the software back to the old version it would fix the 41 degree charge barrier. So yes he is 100% correct that it is "simply a software update".

It's pretty f**g obvious the problem is with the thermal management.

The company apparently broke the buses on purpose to avoid the problem, and is promising to replace the batteries in 2 years (!) so they can be used again.

You really are incapable of cutting and pasting a link????