Adding an "advisory link" is NOT CENSORSHIP. No matter how much you cry about it.

You are right about their algorithms making it shitty. Everything should be required to show most-recent first with NO items that you have not somehow "subscribed" to, and this should be the default behavior. They can always put a button on there saying "things you may like" that will show their algorithm, but you can't read/view the contents unless you click on them, and the result is that you are temporarily subscribed to this source and the main view scrolls to the point where you are looking at that item, with things still in chronological order. There can be a button that says "subscribe to this" to make the subscription permanent.

The video should be modified to include the label. If somebody crops or removes the label and tries to post the result, this editing will be detectable and will cause the label to reappear, or whatever triggered the label will still be there and cause it to reappear.

"Community notes" are just another way to add a comment to a video and are useless. The company's rights to free speech allow it to add any logo to the video it wants, including "this is fake/misleading/a lie". That is NOT censorship no matter how many times you cry that you are being censored.

Yes I don't get this, it sounds very dangerous.

Absolutely they should be slapping a big "this is fake" notice on anything their detector flags as AI. If they make a mistake it is up to the person posting the video to complain and prove their stuff is real and get the notice removed. But the notice will not stop anyone from viewing the video.

It sounds like they are allowing politicians to censor parodies they don't like, and possibly not showing the fake notice on ones they do like.

No I'm suggesting the states still have exactly the same number of electoral votes as they do now.

But votes are calculated by multiplying each vote by the number of electoral votes for the state divided by the actual number of votes in the state.

I feel this might pass the constitutional requirements and the result won't be too far from the popular vote.

The winner-take-all aspect of electoral votes is MUCH more damaging than the fact that they don't match the population.

I believe "approval" voting (where a voter can approve as many/few candidates as they want) will work. However it seems like everybody is more comfortable with being able to rank all their choices from best to worse.

The release notes claim the new version has higher accuracy, meaning it returns different (better) answers for some input strings. It seems to me that it's training can't be limited to the old code in order to achieve this. Still agree that if they fed the code to a program and told it "write a better version" then the copyright of the original code still applies. They may also have just generated a lot of strings and in some (many) cases fed them to the old program and told the AI to make a program that produces the same output for these strings. That would probably be allowed under clean-room rules.

According to you EVs have some kind of "special mass" that causes much more tire particulates than the larger mass of an SUV or truck. And brake particulates are totally harmless so regenerative braking does not help.

The failure you describe was ST everywhere. What is generally being proposed is DST everywhere. And I see no problem with dawn being at 8am. It is well before most people have to go to work which usually starts at 9.

A reasonable solution is to change to Standard Time everywhere, but also allow regions to decide what time zone they are in. If they prefer Daylight Savings Time all the time, they switch one time zone to the East. Maybe make some rules that the resulting time zones must be contiguous.

I suspect the vast majority of them will switch, so it may be useful to rename the timezones so the words Pacific, Mountain, Central, Eastern still correspond mostly to the area they were before.

It's really unclear why Trump does not do this. It would be immensely popular and would fit with his other actions.

I think it is possible that it is because he said at one point that he would "get rid of Daylight Savings Time". When in fact he almost certainly wanted to "have Daylight Savings Time all the time". He does not want to be told he said the wrong thing. However I think this could instead be done as "move the time zones" so everybody is on Standard Time but they are in a different time zone than before. Rename the time zones so the name of the zone you are in does not change, this appears to be what BC did.

I'm pretty certain that if in the 60's they did not require it to be a secret and that a fighter jet could be used, Castro would have been quickly assassinated. Also quite a few heads of state have been killed by individuals or terrorists who are not directly following government orders, JFK is not that unusual.

I believe if the electoral college votes were allocated to match the popular vote in each state it would be fine. Sure somebody in Wyoming has 4x the voting power as somebody in Texas, but this may not matter much, particularly because the population of Wyoming is not that high. There is no election in history where such allocation of electoral votes produces a different result than the popular vote.

Weighing everybody's vote by multiplying it by their state's electoral college size and dividing by the number of votes in that state would also work. This would allow RCV and approval and other multiple-choice voting systems to work.

It can be called "The War Department", which has historical precedent and you won't sound like a moron.

Unfortunately the aliens refused to rename themselves "Trump". He tried "Aliens of America" too.

You are basically saying "there is no such thing as a Nazi or a Communist". That is false.

YOU follow your link, find the list of primary sources, select it, type Ctrl+C, then go back here, make a response and type Ctrl+V.

No I am not going to search for whatever you think is the primary source.