I flew twice but that was because I made the mistake of booking a round trip.

No, vegans have a more limited set of things they will eat compared to vegetarians. It has nothing to do with whether they like the taste of meat.

Your claim that "no vegan would buy something that tastes like meat" is where your argument falls apart.

Craving salt does not mean your body has too little salt in it. Salt by the way is the main problem with fake meat, there is a lot of it added.

You are about the 20th person here to make this lubricous claim. How come so many of you go on and on and on about how humans are evolved to eat and prefer meat (I certainly agree). Then when you need to argue against fake meat suddenly everybody involved does not prefer the taste of meat? WTF?

Hell, invent and market a dish specifically for it, in its best possible consumption, and give it a name and sell it as a product without EVEN MENTIONING that it's meat-free.

That is extremely illegal in many locations. Precisely because there are people who fear it would work and will do anything to stop it.

Veggie burgers are not the fake meat this article is about.

Humans seem to greatly dislike the meat of carnivores, the only exception I can think of is Tuna, and dogs in some places.

This may be a natural evolution to reduce the chances of eating something contaminated?

In any case there sure appears to be a big difference.

I love how you just make up "facts" so you can argue anything you want.

You seem to be confusing the fake-meat industry with the already-existing veggie-patty industry, which are certainly used by people who want to eat vegetarian and also like them.

I can assure you there are LOTS of people prefer the taste of meat. Your argument is bogus.

That's going to need an awful big citation-needed.

Please list exactly how many acres are planted with crops intended for human usage that end up as animal feed, verses how many acres are planted with crops intended for animal feed from the start.

The very first word in the headline for this article is "Trump".

No, the factory is unlikely to be built and operating and making anything before Trump leaves office.

They didn't move anything. The factories in India and China were already there and making phones. They changed where they were delivered. It does sound like Trump's threats to India about buying Russian oil (which I agree with) will likely force Apple to use Chinese iPhones in the USA again.

I agree with you.

A "conspiracy" is when more than one person works together on some action. Possibly the word should not apply unless they make an effort to hide the fact that they are doing the action. But it is going to cover a lot of stuff like business dealings and arranging a surprise birthday party.

A "conspiracy theory" is somebody claiming there is a conspiracy without any proof. May also require that they not be a member of the conspiracy, somebody claiming they are part of a conspiracy but lying should have some other term.

I think I misread the initial posts, the person talking about 9-11 was complaining about the same thing, you need the word "theory" to split real conspiracies from ones that may not exist. Initial poster was claiming you should never use the word "theory".

The "left" tries to use tariffs to change behavior, for instance "unless you bring your worker protections up to American standards you get this tariff". IMHO the chances of this working are just as dismal.